similar to: Tail calls and portability

On 2019-10-15 20:00, asymptosis wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:43:00PM -0400, Demi M. Obenour wrote: >> On 2019-10-15 19:11, Job Snijders wrote: >>> The S in SSH stands for secure. You are asking the wrong group of people. >>> You?ll have to resolve your issue in some other way. >>> >> This tool would only support running on stdin/stdout. Indeed,

In some language implementations, such as the Glasgow Haskell Compiler (GHC) and the reference implementation of Go, a thread’s stack is allocated as a data structure on the garbage-collected heap.  The garbage collector is free to move this data structure whenever it is invoked. Currently, GHC’s LLVM backend does not use the C stack.  However, there have been discussions about whether using the

There have been many cases where I have found myself in need of a pure forwarding tool that can forward sockets over a single stream. In my use cases, this stream is already secure, so there is no need for the tool to do any encryption or authentication. One specific use-case was forwarding a Docker socket to another VM over QubesOS qrexec qrexec, which uses Xen shared memory, but there are

LLDB currently uses a client-server architecture.  That appears fine, but runs into an annoying security problem: other users on the same machine can connect to the TCP socket and take over LLDB and thus the user’s system.  This means that LLDB is useless in multiuser enviromnents on Linux, such as academic computer labs. The immediate problem can be solved by using either HMAC authentication of

On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 12:14?PM Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2/25/23 07:50, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:01 AM Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > >> > >> On 24.02.23 12:58, Keine Eile wrote: > >>> does any one of you have a best practice on renewing ssh host keys on >

On 2019-10-15 19:11, Job Snijders wrote: > The S in SSH stands for secure. You are asking the wrong group of people. > You?ll have to resolve your issue in some other way. > This tool would only support running on stdin/stdout. Indeed, an idiomatic use-case would be to use it as the command argument to ssh(1). The assumption I am making is that anyone that can pass arbitrary data to

On 5/10/23 08:50, Lucas Holt wrote: > On 5/10/23 4:36 AM, Antonio Larrosa wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This is probably a long email, but please bear with me. I plan to >> submit a patch and would like to explain what I will do before doing >> it so I don't lose time if there's some flaw in my plan. >> >> I currently use sshfs to mount directories

Hi, Sorry if you've seen this message before on llvm.discourse.group or elsewhere -- I've been trying to get to the bottom of this for a while now and asked about this in a few different platforms before. I'm currently trying to debug a bug in a LLVM-generated Wasm code. The bug could be in the code that generates LLVM (rustc) or in the LLVM, I'm not sure yet. LLVM IR and Wasm

I have not been able to get scp(1) to download a file with a newline in its name. I know that scp(1) requires that remote filenames be escaped for the shell, but that leads to protocol errors. I am also unable to get sftp(1) to handle such files. It fails with an ?unterminated quoted argument? error, no matter how I try to quote the newline. Furthermore, the SFTP CLI is not well-suited to

On 2/25/23 07:50, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:01 AM Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: >> >> On 24.02.23 12:58, Keine Eile wrote: >>> does any one of you have a best practice on renewing ssh host keys on >>> cloned machines? >>> I have a customer who never thought about that, while cloning all VMs >>>

On 4/18/23 05:05, Norbert Pocs wrote: > Hi OpenSSH mailing list, > > I would like to announce the newly introduced patch in Fedora rawhide [0] > for FIPS compliance efforts. The change will be introduced in an upcoming RHEL 9 > version. Why does Fedora care about FIPS 140? To me, this seems like it should be specific to RHEL and maybe CentOS Stream, not Fedora. My understanding

On 6/19/23 20:20, Damien Miller wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, Ronan Pigott wrote: > >> This adds support for systemd socket-based activation in the ssh-agent. >> When using socket activation, the -a flag value must match the socket >> path provided by systemd, as a sanity check. Support for this feature is >> enabled by the --with-systemd configure flag.

Has anyone considered moving all LLVM development over to Phabricator? Phabricator includes - Code review (Differential) - A bug tracker (Maniphest) - Project management software - A wiki (Phriction) - Many more applications LLVM already has a Phabricator instance.

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, Ronan Pigott wrote: > This adds support for systemd socket-based activation in the ssh-agent. > When using socket activation, the -a flag value must match the socket > path provided by systemd, as a sanity check. Support for this feature is > enabled by the --with-systemd configure flag. > > --- > Something tells me upstream would not be interested in

On 5 Oct 2007, at 20:00, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>> I am not to sure on that. because that would make modules compiled >>> with the flag on incompatible with ones compiled without the flag >>> off >>> as stack behaviour would mismatch. >>> It would be no problem to make the behaviour dependent on the -tail- >>> call-opt flag. i am not sure

On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: >> to me like llvm-gcc honors that. Certainly it should. > > This would imply one fastcc abi (callee pops args on return) to rule > them all? > That is only if fastcall translates to llvm fastcc of course. fastcall != fastcc. fastcall is a well defined convention on x86 that has very specific ABI requirements. fastcc, on the

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:01 AM Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > > On 24.02.23 12:58, Keine Eile wrote: > > does any one of you have a best practice on renewing ssh host keys on > > cloned machines? > > I have a customer who never thought about that, while cloning all VMs > > from one template. Now all machines have the exact same host key. >

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1680 Bug ID: 1680 Summary: Trying to delete offloaded flow with conntrack results in EBUSY Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: kernel

Two related questions. This is with LLVM 2.4 doing a JIT compile to x86-64. (I generate LLVM IR using an IRBuilder instance, compile/optimize, and then call getPointerToFunction() to get a "native" function pointer.) (1) My reading of various mailing list messages seems to indicate that a function marked as using the "fastcc" calling convention

On 5/10/23 4:36 AM, Antonio Larrosa wrote: > Hello, > > This is probably a long email, but please bear with me. I plan to > submit a patch and would like to explain what I will do before doing > it so I don't lose time if there's some flaw in my plan. > > I currently use sshfs to mount directories from some computers and a > NAS into other computers. I recently