similar to: Clang Optimizer freaks out on "simple" goto code?

Hi all, i was using bdrb a while ago and it wasn''t stable enough in version 0.2.1 for doing the job - it loss jobs or did execute only the first one invoked and so on. Now i gave the new version a try and i found a bug at playing around. When i start a worker_method over the normal Unix scheduler bdrb will start as much as possible the worker_method after the :end-time is reached.

FYI there is now serious talk of the Linux kernel dropping support for compilers that *don't* support asm goto. On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 13:13 -0700, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On Apr 4, 2017, at 11:44 AM, John McCall via llvm-dev > > ts.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 4, 2017, at 2:12 PM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> > >

On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 16:26 +0000, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:07 AM Yatsina, Marina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Asm goto feature was introduces to GCC in order to optimize the > > support for tracepoints in Linux kernel (it can be used for other > > things that do nop patching). > >   > > GCC

Linux kernel is using the “asm goto” feature, other projects probably use it as well. I think it provides motivation to support it in LLVM. Regarding the complexity, I believe there is some infrastructure that we can at least partially reuse (the support for “indirectbr” instruction). My focus is adding “asm goto” support, the other things are indeed completely orthogonal and came up in bugs

Hi to all if someone of you is interested on it, i've changed the code of app_asr.c With these patch you can use the ASR application to play DTMF tones, so you can have your own AGI application that uses the ASR and manages the DTMF tones without change the dialplan. EXAMPLE exten => 003,1,Ringing exten => 003,2,Wait(3) exten => 003,3,Answer exten =>

Hi, i have been running R 2.11 compiles with the goto blas libraries successfully for about a year. I am running Ubuntu 10.10 64 bit. However, recently I have been periodically getting a segfault when running R (and numpy -- also compiled against goto blas). When I check the dmesg error log I get the following message R[28792]: segfault at 7f4183ed4000 ip 00007f4196f05f03 sp 00007f4192d55d20

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:31:22AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:08 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote: > > If you ever get to the point where it makes sense to build a kernel with > > LLVM [...] > > Just to speak to this point in particular: it makes sense to build > kernels with LLVM right now. It's already happened;

* Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org> wrote: > To quantify it: I just performed a test build of a Linux distro kernel config > (Fedora x86-64), and counted the number of callsites that use 'asm goto' > functionality with the v4.15 kernel (including drivers). > > The results: > > Linux distro | !CONFIG_TRACING

Code cleanup. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/isoinfo.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/isoinfo.c b/daemon/isoinfo.c index c0ee1c9..fd777bd 100644 --- a/daemon/isoinfo.c +++ b/daemon/isoinfo.c @@ -255,8 +255,6 @@ isoinfo (const char *path) goto done; ret = parse_isoinfo (lines); - if (ret == NULL) - goto done;

Hello, guys. You know LLVM C backend emits 'goto' statement for branching, being based on the bytecode which is composed of units of the basic block. Therefore, I wonder if it would be hard to modify the C backend so as to spits out functions instead of 'goto' statements for branching. I'm just a novice so I have no good sense on this if this would be feasible. How do you

There is a paper from Andew Appel: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=278285 it explains the connection between SSA basic blocks and functions pretty well. This paper may also help: http://www.jantar.org/papers/ssa-lambda/ Cheers, Gabor

Hello, There's been a flurry of activity around indrect goto recently. For anyone interested, here's a document explaining the curent design: http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IndirectGoto.txt Dan

Is goto from inline asm supported in LLVM 2.8 ? I am searching for something similar to what gcc 4.5 does: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#Extended%20asm%20with%20goto http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#Extended%20asm%20with%20goto which allows jumping from inline assembly to a label defined in C. I want to jump from inline asm to a basic block in LLVM.

I have two possible senarios for making a call from an AGI.. Senario1 - Using GoTo In the extensions.conf I have.. [dial-out] exten => _9.,1,AGI(myagi) exten => _9.,2,Dial(SIP/blah/${EXTEN:1}) In the AGI I have.. EXEC GoTo dial-out|9555678|2 So using this method I don't have to really edit the AGI ever if I change the dialplan around as long at the context is correct.. At the end of

I'm working on setting up a macro that will allow users to call their own DID number, and when they hear their voicemail greeting hit the * key and be prompted for their password to check vmail. For some reason though the background command isn't working as I'd expect it to: [macro-vmessage] exten => s,1,Answer exten =>

I am using a combo of static files and Asterisk Realtime configuration. This section works fine when a static file: --------------------------- [from_pstn] ;Voipgate exten => 4507,1,Goto(from_pstn,s,1) exten => s,1,Macro(dial-ext) exten => s,2,Hangup --------------------------- But, when I drop it in the database and try it in Realtime mode I get this error: ---------------------------

Hi, A bit of a problem here which I'd appreciate some thoughts on. (please excuse the stray capital letters - Outlook has a habit of capitalising where I don't want it to!) For various reasons, I need to be able to do the following: --------------8<-------------- [default] Exten => s,1,Macro(dosomething,9999) Exten => s,2,NoOp(Returned) [macro-dosomething] Exten =>

Hi .. When I use the GoTo statement in realtime to goto a priority only ... E.g. Goto(3) then there's no problem But, If I try to jump to another context ... E.g. Goto(othercontext,${EXTEN},3) then it doesn't work If I process the same statement in extensions.conf things go well Are there things broken regarding GoTo in combination with Realtime Extensions ?

I need to have a bash script trigger Asterisk to goto a particular extension (as if that extension were dialed). I can't find any documentation for this. Does anyone know of a way for a bash script to Dial an asterisk extension? (I'm trying to make a bash file call the app_rxfax application which is on extension 123) Thanks, Michelle -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi, Sample database +----+---------------+-------+----------+-----------------+------------- ---- -----+ | id | context | exten | priority | app | appdata | +----+---------------+-------+----------+-----------------+------------- ---- -----+ | 1 | incoming | 6069 | 1 | Goto | incoming-next|6069|1 | | 2 | incoming | 6069 | 2 |