similar to: Saving private DebugInfo

Hi, I noticed that since recently UpgradeDebugInfo (Which is called for loading any bitcode from disk/memory) does a full bitcode verification. Is this on purpose or is this a mistake? Seems to have a fair amount of overhead.

> On Jan 23, 2018, at 11:01 PM, Carlo Kok via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I noticed that since recently UpgradeDebugInfo (Which is called for loading any bitcode from disk/memory) does a full bitcode verification. Is this on purpose or is this a mistake? Seems to have a fair amount of overhead. That is be design, though there are bugs in the LTO

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:26 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at

Op 24-1-2018 om 18:26 schreef Adrian Prantl: > > >> On Jan 23, 2018, at 11:01 PM, Carlo Kok via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I noticed that since recently UpgradeDebugInfo (Which is called for loading any bitcode from disk/memory) does a full bitcode verification. Is this on purpose or is this a mistake? Seems to have a

Hi, I have a IR file generated by Clang: ; ModuleID = 'test_load_lib.c' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-f80:128:128-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32-n8:16:32-S32" target triple = "i686-pc-mingw32" declare i32 @a_outside_func(i32) define i32 @test_func() { entry: %call = call i32

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:26 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu,

Hello I quite thank you for your advice,but I have to tell that it made no difference too calling "LLVMAddGlobalMapping(ee,LLVMGetNamedFunction(m,"_a_outside_func"),(void*)(&a_outside_func));". 2014-04-04 16:10 GMT+08:00 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>: > Hello > > While there is a symbol in the object file, there is nothing like this >

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at

oh,I'm sorry to make such a stupid mistake...But I still have to tell the correct one still didnt make difference...so weird 2014-04-04 16:30 GMT+08:00 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>: > Are you sure, that LLVMGetNamedFunction(m,"_a_outside_func") does not > return NULL? I believe it should be > LLVMGetNamedFunction(m,"a_outside_func") >

Hi, I found that http://llvm.org/doxygen seems to be out-of-date. The footer shows that the files are regenerated everyday. I guess that the input repository for doxygen has not been updated for a while. For example, http://llvm.org/doxygen/namespacellvm.html#adeb6bbe8b1bed333ee7608e1939153c0 It says llvm::ParseBitcodeFile() has following prototype: Module *ParseBitcodeFile(MemoryBuffer

Hello LLVMdev, I’m using LLVM to do static analysis exclusively (without any code generation). To implement this analysis, I’m using multiple address spaces to disambiguate the purpose of the pointed memory. Since address spaces never alias in my model, I set on to implement an alias analysis pass that would exactly provide this information, as I’m seeing a couple of otherwise dead store that

i'm afraid this question is extremely basic, but i've assumed that dumping a .bc file from a module was a trivial operation, but now, first time i have to actually do it from code, for the life of me i can't find one missing step in the process: static void WriteModule ( const Module * M, BitstreamWriter & Stream )

On 8 September 2011 10:57, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Sep 8, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Redmond, Paul wrote: > > Hi,**** > ** ** > Can anyone point me to some code (or offer advice) on how I can merge one > Module into another?**** > ** ** > I have a list of Modules each containing one Function. I would like to > combine them all

Duncan Sands wrote: > Can you please attach IR which can be compiled > to an executable (and shows the problem). I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way I can get compilable IR from that? Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/

> On Jan 24, 2018, at 10:47 PM, Carlo Kok <ck at remobjects.com> wrote: > > > > Op 24-1-2018 om 18:26 schreef Adrian Prantl: >>> On Jan 23, 2018, at 11:01 PM, Carlo Kok via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed that since recently UpgradeDebugInfo (Which is called for loading any

On 14 July 2016 at 20:07, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Pierre Gagelin via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to use the CloneFunction from llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h > and I don't understand how the ValueToValueMapTy argument should be > initialized. For instance,

On 2008-06-11, at 13:16, Gary Benson wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Can you please attach IR which can be compiled to an executable >> (and shows the problem). > > I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling > them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way > I can get compilable IR from that?

I am primarily interested in phi nodes and their induction variables, in ValueTracking file there is an analysis of them, but if the upper bound is inf, it is not working? 2017-08-07 11:41 GMT+02:00 Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya < anastasiya.ruzhanskaya at frtk.ru>: > So, it is not supported to determine by this instruction : %cmp = icmp slt > i32 %i.03, 99, > that %i.03 = phi i32 [ 0,