similar to: Buildbots down

On 13 October 2015 at 21:51, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > Could you point me please (what bots and when did this happen)? http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/6793 > I will look. Thanks! I may be wrong, but this is not the first phantom issue I had to chase recently. :) Just want to make sure there wasn't anything from your side

Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at our end? http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang -Andrzej On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev wrote: > They are online now -

Hi Paula, This error is fine. The buildbot has tested the worker version. 0.8.x apparently does not have that method. The error gets handled gracefully on the server side. At least it seems so so far. That should not prevent your bot from connecting. Thanks Galina On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:11 PM Paula Askar <paulatoth at google.com> wrote: > Hey Andrzej, > > What are you seeing

Hi Galina, I have observed that some of my bots timeout for no apparent reason (no external load, no network mishaps, no issues), and when I go to check the buildslave process, I see that it has just being restarted. Do you know what could be causing this? Swap is untouched, plenty of disk left, CPUs a plenty. So, I'm contemplating the possibility that the master lost connectivity to it and

It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits < cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and looks good. > > Tomorrow at 12:00 PM PDT we will switch the production buildbot to the new >

On 31 October 2016 at 19:46, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > I applied it and reconfigured the master. Thanks Galina! Marco, the build is complaining about Ninja: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-bpf-build/builds/414/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio CMake was unable to find a build program corresponding to "Ninja" Now I remember we used ninja by

Folks, Am I right to assume that if I specify { 'category' : "sanitizer" } to my buildboc config on builders.py, it'll only fire builds on "compiler-rt" repository changes? One of our buildbots, http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-full, is mainly a compiler-rt tester, and most of the time it fails for problems in the sanitizers (as intended),

Hi Galina, The buildbots look stuck on commit 276112. This was right before SVN and the web pages went down for a few minutes. Now SVN is back, but the bots are not picking them up. However, if I "force build", it does pick the latest commit, but says "no responsible users". Any ideas? Maybe restart the master? cheers, --renato

On 13 October 2015 at 22:28, don hinton <hintonda at gmail.com> wrote: > However, the build that failed thought it needed to do 106 steps. It hung > on the 83 that didn't exist. Interesting... > Could this be a cmake/ninja issue? It could. Those bots are not cleaning between builds (or it would take hours). If that's what's happening, I'll have to re-think my

I’ve had another look, and some of the failing tests don’t use temporary files, so I don’t think this is a case of tests having side-effects. Instead, I’ve noticed that in the build log (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/6552/steps/build-unified-tree/logs/stdio), llvm-tblgen.exe is built (my patch modified it), but the table-generation steps of the

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will > need more love and care. > > Please let me

Hi Galina, It seems the 8014 build master is offline? Is that intentional? Should I move the bot back to 8011? http://lab.llvm.org:8014/ cheers, --renato

Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be > a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress

Hello everyone, The buildbot upgrade is entering the phase when the results to become visible. No change is required at this time on any of the builders. The bot owners could upgrade the buildbot on build computers later, at their convenience, as this is not on the critical path. We are going to upgrade the staging bot first. Then, once that is stable and all detected issues are resolved, we

Hey all, It seems that the main buildmaster here is working fine http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ However, I have a 'connection refused' error whilst connecting to the staging buildmaster http://lab.llvm.org:8014/ Are you aware of this Victor and Galina? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have installed ninja and retriggered that build. I will monitor the results to confirm it succeeds. Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 31 October 2016 at 19:46, Galina Kistanova

I'd like to take code ownership of the LLVM Buildbot code. Thanks Galina

Hi, I've had this problem on a compiler-rt change too. It was on the clang-cmake-mips builder earlier this week. ________________________________________ From: llvm-dev [llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] on behalf of Renato Golin via llvm-dev [llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org] Sent: 30 October 2015 08:34 To: Bill Seurer Cc: LLVM Dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Revisions that cause buildbot problems

Hello everyone, It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the reality could be different... I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and

The problem remains after the buildmaster restart. Thanks Galina -----Original Message----- From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:42 AM To: Galina Kistanova Cc: Duncan Sands; llvm-lab-wg at lists.minormatter.com; Galina Kistanova; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed On Tue,