Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "Leveraging newer CMake features for Language standards"
2014 Feb 12
4
[LLVMdev] llvm trunk build failed in cmake_install.cmake on ARM platform
Hi dear list,
I tried to build llvm+clang on an OpenSuse BuildServer for ARM. The
build was carried out with CMake 2.8.11. In the installation step I got
the following error:
> [26815s] -- Installing: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/llvm-3.4.99-336.1.arm/usr/lib/libLLVMSupport.so
> [26815s] CMake Error at lib/Support/cmake_install.cmake:45 (FILE):
> [26815s] file RPATH_CHANGE could
2014 Feb 12
2
[LLVMdev] cmake/ninja build failing
A couple of llvm sub-projects have been failing to build for me for a while (compiler-rt asan and util/unittests, at least). It turns out to be due to the fact that some paths on my system include spaces and other special characters, but the the build.ninja file was not generated with correctly quoted strings. Specifically I'm on OS X and the command is setting -isysroot to a location inside
2012 Nov 06
2
ARM build with v3.7-rc3 with CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV=m
Hey Stefano,
I setup a cross ARM build system so that the generic changes won''t cause build issues
on ARM (and actually caught a bug with fallback.o being enabled there - I''ve a fix
for that).
But more interestingly the build system I do also makes a variations of config entries.
So there is the allmodules, allyes, allyes, but all Xen drivers are modules, etc.
I found out that
2012 Dec 06
3
LVM Checksum error when using persistent grants (#linux-next + stable/for-jens-3.8)
Hey Roger,
I am seeing this weird behavior when using #linux-next + stable/for-jens-3.8 tree.
Basically I can do ''pvscan'' on xvd* disk and quite often I get checksum errors:
# pvscan /dev/xvdf
PV /dev/xvdf2 VG VolGroup00 lvm2 [18.88 GiB / 0 free]
PV /dev/dm-14 VG vg_x86_64-pvhvm lvm2 [4.00 GiB / 68.00 MiB free]
PV /dev/dm-12 VG vg_i386-pvhvm lvm2
2017 Aug 10
2
Keys used to sign releases
I see that some, but not all, releases provide a local link to the key used
to generate the signature files, which makes it difficult for a script to
use them to verify the signatures.
Gcc solves this problem by including the following on their mirrors page (
https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html):
The archives there will be signed by one of the following GnuPG keys:
- 1024D/745C015A 1999-11-09
2020 May 15
2
Building A Project Against LLVM
I decided to start playing around with building my own programming language
recently, and to use LLVM to handle the assembly-level details. I'm on
Kubuntu 18.04, and I started out using LLVM 6.0 from Kubuntu's packages. I
put together code for dealing with my language, then went over the
Kaleidoscope tutorials (which have been extremely helpful btw!). I was
able to successfully get my
2005 Aug 04
3
Ocfs and EMC Powerpath
A couple years ago, we moved to Oracle RAC on Linux using ocfs that is
SAN attached to an EMC CLARiiON. At the time, there was a reason that we
did NOT use EMC's Powerpath (I just can't recall what that reason was).
What I'd like to know is if there are any issues with introducing
Powerpath now.
* RHEL 2.1 AS
* 2.4.9-e.38enterprise
* ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.13-1
* EMC
2004 Sep 15
1
secureCRT 3.3 -> openssh v3.7pl (checkpoint firewall)
Client - secureCRT 3.3 outside the firewall (Checkpoint)
Server - openssh v3.7 on an aix51 rs6k inside the fw
The firewall lets in the first packet but blocks the second with the
message: ssh 1.x not allowed. The connection gets reset. Here is the
trace from the client:
[SSH LOCAL ONLY] : Connect: 12.x.x.x:22 [direct]
[SSH LOCAL ONLY] : StateChange:
2012 Oct 15
1
[PATCH] xen/xenbus: silence GCC warning
Compiling xenbus_xs.o triggers this GCC warning:
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c:628:13: warning: function declaration isn?t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
Add the obvious and trivial fix.
While we're touching this function add some equally obvious and trivial
whitespace fixes.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle at tiscali.nl>
---
0) Triggered by compiling v3.7-rc1 using
2012 Oct 15
1
[PATCH] xen/xenbus: silence GCC warning
Compiling xenbus_xs.o triggers this GCC warning:
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c:628:13: warning: function declaration isn?t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
Add the obvious and trivial fix.
While we're touching this function add some equally obvious and trivial
whitespace fixes.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle at tiscali.nl>
---
0) Triggered by compiling v3.7-rc1 using
2004 May 23
5
OpenSSH v3.8p1 fails to interoperate for GSSAPI (Kerberos) and X-Windows
Versions: openssh-3.8p1-33, heimdal-0.6.1rc3-51, XFree86-4.3.99.902-40,
tk-8.4.6-37, all from SuSE 9.1 (unhacked); back-version peers have
openssh-3.5p1, XFree86-4.3.0-115, etc. from SuSE 8.2.
Symptoms:
1. When the client and server versions are unequal, the Kerberos ticket
is not accepted for authentication. All the clients have
PreferredAuthentications gssapi-with-mic, gssapi, others.
2.
2020 May 16
2
Building A Project Against LLVM
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:53 PM Neil Nelson via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Rarrum,
>
> Kubuntu 20.04 LTS is available. You may be able to upgrade to 19.10, and
> then to 20.04 without reinstalling. It can be done on Xubuntu. A direct
> upgrade to 20.04 should become available. LLVM 10 then installs from the
> distribution packages. I put all this on a
2015 Jun 01
1
GlusterFS 3.7 - slow/poor performances
Dear all,
I have a crash test cluster where i?ve tested the new version of GlusterFS (v3.7) before upgrading my HPC cluster in production.
But? all my tests show me very very low performances.
For my benches, as you can read below, I do some actions (untar, du, find, tar, rm) with linux kernel sources, dropping cache, each on distributed, replicated, distributed-replicated, single (single
2015 Jun 02
2
GlusterFS 3.7 - slow/poor performances
hi Geoffrey,
Since you are saying it happens on all types of volumes,
lets do the following:
1) Create a dist-repl volume
2) Set the options etc you need.
3) enable gluster volume profile using "gluster volume profile <volname>
start"
4) run the work load
5) give output of "gluster volume profile <volname> info"
Repeat the steps above on new and old
2020 May 16
2
Building A Project Against LLVM
I've managed to get 10.0.0 working now.. there were a couple things I had
to adjust.
The Kaleidoscope example had me doing this before creating the object file:
llvm::InitializeAllTargetInfos();
llvm::InitializeAllTargets();
llvm::InitializeAllTargetMCs();
llvm::InitializeAllAsmParsers();
llvm::InitializeAllAsmPrinters();
It turns out I can get away with just this, since I'm not (yet)
2015 Jul 16
5
[LLVMdev] Using thin archives when building llvm
I have just committed support to llvm-ar for creating thin archives.
The idea of thin archives is that they contain just the symbol table
and the path to find the original .o files.
By locally making thin archives the default I was able to build
llvm+lld+clang with them. The total size of the .a files goes from
181,658,164 to 7,116,900 bytes.
Is there any way to do that with cmake without having
2012 Nov 30
1
compiling R for Windows 64 bit
Dear All,
I'm trying to compile R for Windows 64 bit.
I'm following the instructions of R installation and administration
guide v2.15.2 (3.1; A.3.1.4; C.2.2)
and at the moment I compiled the default version (single threaded,
gcc, without external BLAS) ?on my notebook (windows xp 32 bit)
Now I'm trying to compile it on Windows servers 64 bit with the next
configuration :
1. Windows
2002 Oct 16
10
htb limiting trouble: no overlimit or dropped packets
Hi!
I''m trying to limit the uplink bandwidth using htb but no packets are
overlimit or dropped. :-(
My router config:
* Linux kernel 2.4.20-pre10 (htb v3.7) with everything built as
modules in QoS, iptables in use.
* tc binary from htb3.6-020525.tgz
* external interface eth0: Internet access, 512 kbit/s uplink speed
* internal interface eth1: internal LAN, 100 Mbit/s
The hosts in the
2018 Dec 06
4
[cfe-dev] RFC: Modernizing our use of auto
> On Dec 4, 2018, at 10:59 AM, George Burgess IV <george.burgess.iv at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think people are too eager to use `auto` because it is easy to write but it makes the types substantially harder for the reader to understand
>
> I'm probably the Nth person to ask this, but what keeps us from promoting the use of a clang-tidy-powered tool that basically
2011 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] Strategy for leveraging llvm optimizations in vm
On 9/13/11 9:22 AM, Michael Clagett wrote:
> Oooohhh! That's interesting. Does the optimizer just work around
> these inline fragments? Is there documentation for this facility?
CC'ing the mailing list.
The inline assembly feature is described in the LLVM Language Reference
Manual (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html). I'm not really familiar
with what the LLVM optimizers