similar to: DebugInfo: purpose of align field

Hello Adrian, sorry for the delay with the response. Somehow I missed your message.. On 09/13/2016 12:43 AM, Adrian Prantl wrote: >> On Sep 10, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Victor Leschuk via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> I am currently implementing support for DWARFv5 DW_AT_alignment attr and I got a question about align field in

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:24 PM Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Sep 30, 2016, at 4:05 PM, Victor Leschuk <vleschuk at accesssoftek.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello Adrian, sorry for the delay with the response. Somehow I missed > your message.. > > > > On 09/13/2016 12:43 AM, Adrian Prantl wrote: >

Hello, I'm having this error and couldn't find a resolution from online, any help would be greatly appreciated: clang: /export/home/hzhang86/chapel/chapel-llvm36/chapel/third-party/llvm/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp:839: void llvm::DwarfUnit::addType(llvm::DIE&, llvm::DIType, llvm::dwarf::Attribute): Assertion `Ty && "Trying to add a type that doesn't

Hello all, it looks like we have a bug here but I am not sure. Currently if we have two similar types with implicit_const attributes and different values we end up with only one abbrev in .debug_abbrev section. For example consider two structures: S1 with implicit_const attribute ATTR and value VAL1 and S2 with implicit_const ATTR and value VAL2. The .debug_abbrev section will contain only 1

I think this is https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16846 On Jun 4, 2015 12:04 PM, "Hui Zhang" <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> wrote: > Is there any clue for this error ? > > Thanks > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Hui Zhang <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm having this error and couldn't find a

Upgrade clang? I can't reproduce it with trunk. On 4 June 2015 at 14:48, Hui Zhang <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I found this link, but what's the solution?? > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Rafael Espíndola > <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think this is https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16846 >> >> On

Hello all, I am implementing support for .debug_names section (which is introduced in DWARFv5 standard as replacement for .debug_pubnames and .debug_pubtypes). The question is: should usage of DWARF version 5 force generation of .debug_names instead of .debug_pubnames or we can make it just default behavior and provide user with the interface (cmd switch) to use other DWARFv5 features but

In llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp, the compiler can emit a DW_AT_calling_convention attribute with a DW_TAG_class_type (and it looks like a DW_TAG_variant_part, DW_TAG_structure_type or DW_TAG_union_type as well), but the DWARF 4 specification says that DW_AT_calling_convention is not a valid attribute for any of those three DWARF tags. Downstream object consumers that check to verify

Before metadata was separated from values, I could create a debug info forward declaration and eventually resolve it using LLVMReplaceAllUsesWith in core.h. Now, I can't figure out how to resolve it. I can find no function that seems to do this. My one wild guess that giving the forward decl and the resolving decl the same UniqueId might do it is not working. I am currently using 3.6.1, but

Is there a more convenient way to obtain a DIType given a Type than matching up the strings for the names? For example, given: struct S { int x, y; } s; void foo(S *a) { a->x = 0; a->y = 1; } There are DIType nodes for the struct Type: !6 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "S", file: !3, line: 1, size: 64, flags: DIFlagTypePassByValue,

Hi Victor, The work Wolfgang is doing should get us to the "minimum syntactically correct DWARF v5" stage, which we really wanted to have for LLVM 7.0. That is, once we have .debug_rnglists and .debug_loclists done, you can ask for DWARF 5 and get something that conforms to the spec. However, it won't conform if you ask for type units (I'm working on that) or split DWARF. If

Hello, I hope I will have time to help you with that. I discussed dwarfv5 .debug_names implementation with involved party from RH. Anyway even if can't help much could you keep me in the loop please? On 01/17/2018 07:13 PM, Pavel Labath via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello all, > > In <https://reviews.llvm.org/D41986#977215> it was brought up that > there are at least two parties

It's now a multi-stage process. First, there is a difference between a permanent forward declaration (i.e. the actual definition is in a different file) and a temporary forward declaration (i.e. it will appear later in the same file). To create a permanent forward declaration: DICompositeType *result = m_DIBuilder->createForwardDecl( dwarf::DW_TAG_structure_type,

Seems like something infinite-recursion like to me: $ clang --version clang version 6.0.0 (trunk 317833) Target: powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu $ clang -c test.ll warning: overriding the module target triple with powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu [-Woverride-module] ... #255 0x0000000012b07a78 llvm::DwarfUnit::getOrCreateTypeDIE(llvm::MDNode const*) ... So I'd say it reproduces. On Wed, Nov 15,

Hello all, In <https://reviews.llvm.org/D41986#977215> it was brought up that there are at least two parties interested in having DWARF5 accelerator tables implemented, so I'm writing this email to see if there's anyone else interested in this topic, and to try to synchronize our efforts. Our interest for this stems from a desire to make dwarf parsing fast on non-apple targets

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Tim > Northover via llvm-dev > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 3:07 AM > To: Nat! > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] A question to the DWARF experts on symbol > indirection > > Hi Nat!, > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 at 01:21, Nat! via

Hi David, Excuse me for delayed answer. It took some time to prepare. Please, find the answers bellow... >Broad question: Do you have any specific motivation/users/etc in implementing this (if you can speak about it)? > - it might help motivate the work, understand what tradeoffs might be suitable for you/your users, etc. There are two general requirements: 1) Remove (or clean) invalid

The next feature on my DWARF 5 list is the line-table header. While this is pretty easy generate, it is a real bear to parse, so I thought I should let y'all know what I'm up to and why as I head out to the yak farm. Any thoughts and suggestions would be very much appreciated. The v5 directory and file tables no longer have a fixed format; instead, we have a list of field descriptors

Hi David, Sorry, I forget to attach the valgrind dump to this. I was not sure if my implementation was ok, so I wanted to ask if I've done something wrong first. Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) Access not within mapped region at address 0xB at 0x54F4516: llvm::object::COFFObjectFile::moveSectionNext(llvm::object::DataRefImpl&) const

Hi folks, I am trying to implement the C bindings API for DebugInfo::DWARF::DWARFDie. My goal is to have a C library that reads and parses DWARF debugging format (just like how llvm-dwarfdump does, but maybe more than just dumping debug info) I've started with creating C structure for DebugInfo::DWARF::DWARFContext which contains all DWARF DIEs in the object file. For this I used ```