similar to: Upgrading phabricator

Is there any ETA? -Krzysztof On 9/29/2016 5:34 AM, Eric Liu via llvm-dev wrote: > That was a bad estimation. Database upgrade is taking time. > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:03 AM Eric Liu <ioeric at google.com > <mailto:ioeric at google.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Phabricator(reviews.llvm.org <http://reviews.llvm.org>) will be down > for

> On Sep 29, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Eric Liu via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sorry for blocking everyone for so long. No pb, thanks very much for taking care of it :) > It has been more than a year since the last upgrade, and mysql is adjusting schema for a table with ~150G data on a single VM instance. 150GB? I’m very surprised there is so much data in our

Still no word on when it will be back up? It's not hung is it? :D On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:03 AM mats petersson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 29 September 2016 at 16:11, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Eric Liu via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

Hi all, Phabricator is (finally) back online! Let me know if you have any feedback or problem :) Thanks, Eric On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:23 PM Eric Liu <ioeric at google.com> wrote: > According to top and iotop, mysqld is still working, and the progress bar > did move by a little bit, so I think it's just really slow. Apologies if > this is blocking you. > > On Thu,

One of the new “feature” is that emails are HTML only right now. Not quite nice for the archive (or for interacting by email). See for instance: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160926/172081.html (Also the funky "[Changed Subscribers] “ in the title) Another issue is that we can’t delete unposted inline comment anymore. — Mehdi > On Sep 29, 2016, at 9:35 PM,

Sorry for the off topic. When I login my Phabricator account, I see there is alarm saying "Account Setup Issue: Primary Email Unverified". I cannot see where to ask Phabricator send verification mail to my primary email address. Could you help me out? :-) Thanks. Regards, chenwj 2017-04-24 18:35 GMT+08:00 Eric Liu via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > It's working

... for ~30 mins. Sorry for the inconvenience! - Eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170424/c270de68/attachment.html>

Adding +Eric Liu <ioeric at google.com> who helps with Phabricator.... On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 3:15 PM Davide Italiano via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Anton Korobeynikov > <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > Thanks, fixed. > > > > Also, FWIW, phabricator commit mails are broken. Example: > >

So, I forwarded the request for highlighting trailing whitespaces to phabricator upstream (https://secure.phabricator.com/T11879), and upstream folks suggest we enable the Lint feature in Arcanist ( https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/arcanist_lint/). This will enforce the check when `arc diff` is run (reviewers wouldn't see the warnings though). There are two linters we

This has been going on since at least Friday too. On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:45 AM Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:18 PM Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> phabricator seems to have stopped sending emails. All other functionality >> is ok, it just does not

Thanks for the catch Dead! I'll send out patches to update .arcconfig files to use https. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:22 PM Dean Michael Berris <dberris at google.com> wrote: > Thanks Eric, > > If you're like me who started doing this and found some weird errors, you > may have to do the following instead: > > $ arc install-certificate

Why isn’t it in the LLVM repo? > On Nov 16, 2016, at 7:44 AM, Johannes Doerfert <doerfert at cs.uni-saarland.de> wrote: > > We have a clang format based arcanist linter (and some others) in the > Polly repository. When arcanist is used to create a review, the linter > result is shown online. We also have an arcanist add-on to run the lit > tests and show their result in

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Eric Liu via cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I've switched the default email format to be plain text only now. This > option should be per-user configurable, but somehow it is not shown in the > "Settings"; I'll try if I can make the option personalized. Thank you for working on this upgrade! Is there a way

Is Phabricator down again? I'm starting to see the following: [Rendering Exception] Multiple exceptions during processing and rendering. - AphrontQueryConnectionException: Attempt to connect to phabricator at localhost failed with error #1040: Too many connections. - InvalidArgumentException: Argument 1 passed to AphrontView::setUser() must be an instance of PhabricatorUser, null

Yep, sorry, we ran out of space on the instance's database volume. I'll update this once we're back up. On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Justin Holewinski < justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Is Phabricator down again? I'm starting to see the following: > > [Rendering Exception] Multiple exceptions during processing and rendering. > -

Would it make sense to officially have phabricator ignore all replies to the email thread, and instead require that all comments are done through phabricator itself? -Krzysztof On 5/25/2016 10:20 AM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > Just ran into another thread where phabricator is seemingly ignoring > replies. This one seems to be a different issue. > > In the thread

Just ran into another thread where phabricator is seemingly ignoring replies. This one seems to be a different issue. In the thread "[PATCH] D20337: [MC] Support symbolic expressions in assembly directives", Phabricator seems to have completely ignored all of the replies starting with my (emailed) reply earlier today: "The .s does have a way to carry the location.". Except

On 11/14, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote: > Ideally I’d even really like to have a both checking for revision on > phab, clang-formatting them, and post a comment when there is a > mismatch :) I'd like that! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL:

> On Jan 2, 2018, at 11:31 AM, Christoph Kindl via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > >> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:59:56 -0600 >> From: Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> >> To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> Subject:

Hi, > Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:59:56 -0600 > From: Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Submitting patches for LLVM -- llvm-commits > vs. Phabricator? > > Hi, > The current practice is to upload a