similar to: llvm interpreter does not find function defined by addGlobalMapping

Hi, I am a new user to R. I am having the following problem while using R: The defined function is having following a$unit as input but if I define a$unit1 then still I am getting the output which is not desired. __________________________ *Function:* testfunction<-function(a){ stopifnot(a$unit==1) cat("All is well") } b<-list(unit1=1 ) testfunction(b)

Hi: My llvm code is: for( BasicBlock::iterator i = b->begin() , ie = b->end(); b != be ; b ++ ){ if( CallInst * pCall = dyn_cast<CallInst>(i)){ pCall->dump(); // Function * pFunction = pCall->getCalledFunction(); if( !pFunction ){ } std::string fname = pFunction->getName(); } } The dump result

thanks! After I check the ll file, I find this: %1 = load %struct.nsAString** %aBuf_addr, align 4, !dbg !2048 %2 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.nsAString* %1, i32 0, i32 0, !dbg !2048 %3 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.nsISupports* %2, i32 0, i32 0, !dbg !2048 %4 = load i32 (...)*** %3, align 4, !dbg !2048 %5 = getelementptr inbounds i32 (...)** %4, i32 10, !dbg !2048 %6 = load i32 (...)**

> On 1/26/11 2:40 PM, songlh at cs.wisc.edu wrote: >> thanks! >> >> After I check the ll file, I find this: >> >> %1 = load %struct.nsAString** %aBuf_addr, align 4, !dbg !2048 >> %2 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.nsAString* %1, i32 0, i32 0, !dbg >> !2048 >> %3 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.nsISupports* %2, i32 0, i32 0, !dbg >> !2048

On 1/26/11 2:07 PM, songlh at cs.wisc.edu wrote: > Hi: > > My llvm code is: > > for( BasicBlock::iterator i = b->begin() , ie = b->end(); > b != be ; b ++ ){ > if( CallInst * pCall = dyn_cast<CallInst>(i)){ > > pCall->dump(); // > Function * pFunction = pCall->getCalledFunction(); > if(

Hello LLVM team, our software FluidSIM (www.fluidsim.de) simulates pneumatic, hydraulic and electric circuits. For the mathematical models we use the language Modelica (www.modelica.org). We developed our own Modelica simulator which solves the dynamical created algebraic differential equation systems. One tool is our small JIT compiler, which compiles mathematical expressions like “2*x0 +

On 1/26/11 2:40 PM, songlh at cs.wisc.edu wrote: > thanks! > > After I check the ll file, I find this: > > %1 = load %struct.nsAString** %aBuf_addr, align 4, !dbg !2048 > %2 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.nsAString* %1, i32 0, i32 0, !dbg !2048 > %3 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.nsISupports* %2, i32 0, i32 0, !dbg !2048 > %4 = load i32 (...)*** %3, align 4, !dbg !2048

On 1/26/11 3:00 PM, songlh at cs.wisc.edu wrote: >> On 1/26/11 2:40 PM, songlh at cs.wisc.edu wrote: >>> thanks! >>> >>> After I check the ll file, I find this: >>> >>> %1 = load %struct.nsAString** %aBuf_addr, align 4, !dbg !2048 >>> %2 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.nsAString* %1, i32 0, i32 0, !dbg >>> !2048 >>> %3

It seems that 'return' is not necessary when returning a value. If this is the case, I don't understand why 'return' is a keyword in R. Is there a case in which I have to use 'return'? > f<-function(x) { + x + } > g<-function(x) { + return(x) + } > print(f(2)) [1] 2 > print(g(2)) [1] 2 >

Hi all, I writen one function in Rgui(R Editor) I saved it as testfunction.R and while I am running that file using source(C:/testfunction.R) its running and it is giving subsequent result insted of this there is any thing like to save my function to save in existing library to reuse it when ever I want to use because I have to use those function from my C# code right now I am not able to

Hello, I am attempting to write a function that assigns a value to a row or column within the matrix that it runs on. I am, however, having trouble accessing the row or column within this dynamic variable. I have looked through the archives (nothing there) and read the rules for posting to this list. Please help me out! Here is a sample of the problem: testMatrix = matrix(data=2, nrow=10,

Hola LLVMers, I'm looking to make use of the vectorization primitives in the Intel chip with the code we generate from LLVM and so I've started experimenting with it. What is the state of the machine code generated for vectors? In my tinkering, I seem to be getting some wonky machine instructions, but I'm most likely just doing something wrong and I'm hoping you can set me in

Hello, I found saw some strange behavior (to me) when converting constant arrays to strings. Consider the following example: std::string Text = "HelloWorld"; unsigned TextLengthBefore = Text.length(); ConstantArray *pArray = dyn_cast<ConstantArray>(llvm::ConstantArray::get(pModule->getContext(), Text, true)); unsigned NumElements = pArray->getNumOperands(); Text =

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Chuck Rose III wrote: > I'm looking to make use of the vectorization primitives in the Intel > chip with the code we generate from LLVM and so I've started > experimenting with it. What is the state of the machine code generated > for vectors? In my tinkering, I seem to be getting some wonky machine > instructions, but I'm most likely just doing

Hrm. This problem shouldn't be target specific. I am pretty sure prologue / epilogue inserter aligns stack correctly if there are stack objects with greater than default stack alignment requirement. Seems to be the initial alloca() instruction should specify 16 byte alignment? Evan On Jul 21, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Chuck Rose III wrote:

Hi everybody, I am interested in seeing how the p value is calculated for a t test for a correlation coefficient. I know that cor.test delivers the correlation coefficient and the t-test, p-value and the 95 confidence interval. I am interested in how the p-value is calculated. Usually if i type the name of the function i get explicitly the coding of that function, but if i type >

Hi Chuck! On Jul 20, 2007, at 11:36 AM, Chuck Rose III wrote: > Hola LLVMers, > > > > I’m looking to make use of the vectorization primitives in the > Intel chip with the code we generate from LLVM and so I’ve started > experimenting with it. What is the state of the machine code > generated for vectors? In my tinkering, I seem to be getting some > wonky

I am fairly certain this is right. Chuck, can you do a quick experiment for me? Go back to your original code but make sure the alloca instruction specify 16-byte alignment. The code should work. If not, please file a bug. Thanks, Evan On Jul 24, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > Hrm. This problem shouldn't be target specific. I am pretty sure > prologue / epilogue inserter

I convert my old JS files into CoffeeScript, In my public controller I used this functions $(''#events a'').lightBox() $(document).ready -> $("#slider").easySlider auto: true, continuous: true they load inside application.js like this (function() { $(''#events a'').lightBox(); $(document).ready(function() {

Hi, I haven't seen a response and I'm curious if I should submit a patch for this. Thanks, Javier From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Martinez, Javier E Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 3:20 PM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] Strange behavior when converting arrays to strings Hello, I found saw some strange behavior (to