similar to: typedef or using in C++ code

> On Sep 7, 2016, at 4:50 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:30:01PM -0700, Eugene Zelenko via llvm-dev wrote: >> What should be used for type declarations: typedef or using? typedef >> is there because of historical reasons, but LLVM code based is C++11 >> now. >> >> LLVM Coding

2017-04-29 0:49 GMT+02:00 Eugene Zelenko via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hi! > > I encounter problem with Polly build (in-tree, libraries are linked > statically). It appeared ~ 2 days agor for first time. > > include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h:73:14: fatal error: > 'llvm/IR/Attributes.gen' file not found > #include

2017-05-02 0:50 GMT+02:00 Eugene Zelenko via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: >> 2017-05-01 20:16 GMT+02:00 Eugene Zelenko via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: >>> Hi, Hongbin! >>> >>> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Hongbin Zheng

Hi! If I'm not mistaken old makefiles are not supported in 3.8. If this is a case, i think till be good idea to remove them before 3.8 branching. Eugene.

Hi! I encounter problem with Polly build (in-tree, libraries are linked statically). It appeared ~ 2 days agor for first time. include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h:73:14: fatal error: 'llvm/IR/Attributes.gen' file not found #include "llvm/IR/Attributes.gen" It seems that dependencies on IR are not set properly. Eugene.

2017-05-01 20:16 GMT+02:00 Eugene Zelenko via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hi, Hongbin! > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Hongbin Zheng <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Eugene, >> >> It is strange, I also do a clean build with CMake+make with r301734 and it >> is ok. Could you provide more details? >> >> Thanks >>

Hi! compiler-rt's CMakeLists.txt still contains tweaks for CMake version 2.8. Pre-2.8.12 are definitely irrelevant for CMake 3.4.3, but may be post-2.8.12 tweaks are irrelevant too? Eugene.

Hi! There is surge of spam bug reports with support phone numbers of various companies. I remember couple of such reports made ~ 2-3 weeks ago. I think will be good idea to block IP-addresses or their range, if Bugzilla support this, since a-mails are different. Eugene.

Any chance I could beg a couple of week extension on the removal? We're tracking ToT and ran into some minor snags getting switched over to cmake. Having an extra couple of weeks would be really useful. Philip On 01/07/2016 10:54 AM, Eric Christopher via llvm-dev wrote: > They're deprecated in 3.8. Chris and I are making plans for when > (after branch) the removal happens. >

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-commits < llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:40:06PM -0800, Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits > wrote: > > Tried to fix the warning, and I'm not now sure if the warning makes > sense. > > These "'~': zero extending '<smaller integer type>' to

Hi! There are a lot of accepted but not closed revisions in Differential. Many of them were actually committed, but without Differential revision link or when it was specified in wrong way. I think will be good idea to create script which will match committed revisions with those in Differential: file list should be same and hashes of changed line could be calculated for each file. In case of

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 08:43:01PM -0800, Eli Friedman wrote: > clang's cross-compilation support isn't really mature; you might be > able to get away with specifying "-ccc-host-triple sparc-sun-solaris > -nostdinc -I /path/to/sparc/headers/". Please read that as "clang's cross-compilation support is not magical". It's not a question of maturity that

Hi Eugene, It is strange, I also do a clean build with CMake+make with r301734 and it is ok. Could you provide more details? Thanks Hongbin On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Eugene Zelenko via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, Michael! > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> > wrote: > > 2017-04-29 0:49

> De : Joerg Sonnenberger [mailto:joerg at britannica.bec.de] > > The basic idea is to still create a relocation on the MC level, but fix it up later. > You didn't say if your ISA is fixed or variable length, the former, can simplify > this quite bit. The constant island pass generally tries to address two issues: > (1) Merging of identical constants. > (2) Splitting the

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:55:53PM -0700, Jim Grosbach wrote: > The builtins are for internal compiler use in the context of SjLj > exception handling. Any other use, including any direct calls of the > builtins in user code, are a bad idea with no guaranteed behaviour. > That they're exposed at all is, again, for historical purposes. Don't use them. Why is longjmp converted

On 2 December 2014 at 19:57, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 07:23:01PM +0000, Robert Lougher wrote: >> In feedback from game studios a common issue is the replacement of >> loops with calls to memcpy/memset. These loops are often >> hand-optimised, and highly-efficient and the developers strongly want >> a way to

Hi! Company behind PVS-Studio analyzed relatively recent version of LLVM and some results are reported in http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0446/. Eugene.

Hi! There were several new spam entries in Bugizlla, created from previously created accounts. I think will be good idea to delete them as well as block spammers accounts : Report IDs: 30192, 30191, 30187, 30186, 30185, 30182, 28766, 28717, 28715, 28714. Eugene.

Bringing this up on llvm-dev for more general attention. The problem here is two fold: (1) Reuse of enumeration values is just a major no-go. (2) I'm not sure why the existing vector types had to be killed completely. But something clearly has to be done here. This majorly affects e.g. Mesa. Joerg ----- Forwarded message from Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at

Thanks! On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 08:43:01PM -0800, Eli Friedman wrote: >> clang's cross-compilation support isn't really mature; you might be >> able to get away with specifying "-ccc-host-triple sparc-sun-solaris >> -nostdinc -I /path/to/sparc/headers/". >