similar to: Buildbot General Failure - Production Stop?

On 5 September 2016 at 23:04, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Let's first see how bad it is once bots are fixed to build the latest > revision. It's only been a few days and that includes a weekend. Of course. I'll wait until all our bots return from the first round to know the size of the damage. I just wanted to warn all other buildbot owners

Hello everyone, Zorg upgrade to a recent version of buildbot is coming. We would do our best to make the transition as smooth and transparent to the majority of LLVM community, as possible. The process will be handled similar to how we did the github transition. As the next step, we will be cleaning zorg. All the code, which is not currently in use in the public build bot, will be removed. If

Hi, I've had this problem on a compiler-rt change too. It was on the clang-cmake-mips builder earlier this week. ________________________________________ From: llvm-dev [llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] on behalf of Renato Golin via llvm-dev [llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org] Sent: 30 October 2015 08:34 To: Bill Seurer Cc: LLVM Dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Revisions that cause buildbot problems

It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits < cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and looks good. > > Tomorrow at 12:00 PM PDT we will switch the production buildbot to the new >

Galina, Looks like the build bots have frozen. Expected? Joe Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 jabbey at arxan.com<mailto:jabbey at arxan.com> www.arxan.com<http://www.arxan.com/> On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Galina Kistanova wrote: Author: gkistanova Date: Fri Nov 18 13:49:26 2011 New Revision: 144978

Hi Paula, This error is fine. The buildbot has tested the worker version. 0.8.x apparently does not have that method. The error gets handled gracefully on the server side. At least it seems so so far. That should not prevent your bot from connecting. Thanks Galina On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:11 PM Paula Askar <paulatoth at google.com> wrote: > Hey Andrzej, > > What are you seeing

Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at our end? http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang -Andrzej On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev wrote: > They are online now -

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think having -Werror bots is a good idea, at least when self hosting. > Non-self-hosting -Werror (i.e. with older versions of Clang, or with GCC, > etc.) might also be useful, but I'm less sure (since we can't fix those > warnings if the warning is the problem). On Tue, Mar

I just changed this build on green dragon to warn and email if warnings are found in the console log: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA_build/ > On Mar 22, 2016, at 6:24 PM, David Jones via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at

Hi, I broke the MLIR build yesterday and the two Flang bots told me about it pretty much right away. Yay! That is how I always thought the setup should work (modulo that we all try not to break builds). Today I got emails from an MLIR bot and I was a bit confused. I looked at the configuration of the two MLIR bots and it seems they test commits one by one, with the backlog that you would

On 08/26/2015 09:38 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 26 August 2015 at 17:30, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: >> To say this differently, we will revert a *change* which is problematic. >> Why shouldn't we "revert" a bot? > I don't disagree, just don't want to do that lightly. Most certainly > not before we have comments from the bot

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 26 August 2015 at 17:27, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > @Galina: It seems this bot is now almost permanently running into a > > compile-time > > timeout. Maybe you can fix this by either increasing the timeout or by > > switching to a

Great, good to know it's not just a problem with our bot. Thanks! On 28 August 2017 at 16:24, Chris Matthews <cmatthews5 at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Diana, > > I have seen that issue on some other bots too. I will fix it this week. It is something about how MySQL treats character encodings differently than Postgres. We are checking for the value in the table beforehand, and this

On 08/26/2015 08:21 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: > On 26 August 2015 at 15:44, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> What time-line do you have in mind for this fix? If you are in charge >> and can make this happen within a day, giving cmake + ninja a chance seems >> OK. > It's not my bot. All my bots are CMake+Ninja based and are stable enough.

@Galina: It seems this bot is now almost permanently running into a compile-time timeout. Maybe you can fix this by either increasing the timeout or by switching to a cmake/ninja based build as suggested by Renato. On 08/26/2015 05:21 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: > On 26 August 2015 at 15:44, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> What time-line do you have in mind

On 08/26/2015 09:46 AM, Philip Reames wrote: > On 08/26/2015 09:41 AM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Renato Golin >> <renato.golin at linaro.org <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: >> >> On 26 August 2015 at 17:39, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com >> <mailto:dblaikie at

> On Aug 26, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 26 August 2015 at 15:44, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> What time-line do you have in mind for this fix? If you are in charge >> and can make this happen within a day, giving cmake + ninja a chance seems >> OK. > > It's not my bot.

On 15.11.2012, at 23:16, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> kinda random, but do we have a centralized list of all of the >> buildbots? I see a lot of different URL's in IRC, but no list so I can >> check "all of the waterfalls". I'm not talking about the

+1 for batching. In practice it's probably more important that things get run for every MLIR checkin, and not necessarily for every LLVM checkin. Steve On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:26 AM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Indeed there is quite a backlog here right now: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/mlir-windows and here >

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 26 August 2015 at 17:39, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > *shrug* I haven't looked at whatever specific bots are under discussion, > but > > I really wouldn't mind/would like if the bots had a more "revert to > green" > > feel to them just