similar to: Trouble with NUT?

Hello world; been using nut atop Debian GNU/Linux (sid) for about two years by now, my configuration broke as I upgraded the machine this morning (headin' for kernel 2.6 to have full support for the new GBE NIC included). I read through the UPGRADE.gz instructions provided with the Debian packages and tried to fix things according to the instructions pointed out there, but things still just

Has anyone tried installing Asterisk on ClarkConnect? It looks like ClarkConnect runs on RHEL so it should work if they haven't modified it too much. It appears that ClarkConnect is working on adding Asterisk and integrating it into their GUI but until then I'd also be interested in trying to use FreePBX. Anyone?

Been having a problem with my two Sipura 2000's dropping calls from the SPA-2000 side. Seems the calls are dropped right before the "Next Registration" time. Calls drop about ever 60 minutes or so. I have dialed from one port to the other and let it sit. After about 60 minutes or so the calls get dropped. System details are below Asterisk ver. CVS-HEAD-11/27/04-23:42:45 RHEL 3

Hi Drew, I no longer work on NUT, but the folks at the nut-upsuser mailing list are extremely helpful. See http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser The 2.0.3 release is *way* out of date; the current stable NUT release is 2.2.0. It contains many improvements, particularly to the newhidups driver (which is now called usbhid-ups). If your distribution does not package a current

Hello list, I don't know what is breaking my samba box but I am really very worried and confused !! My samba server has no problem with linux client. "smbclient -L <samba IP> -U <samba user>" runs well. No problem at all. But whenever I try to access the shares from Win-XP it reports that "path not found". And after repeatedly trying the same Win-XP

hi have a little problem of configuration I have a network with a server (192.168.0.1) and other pc one is 192.168.0.20 i want to reject all output from 192.168.0.20 for port 4000 (tcp and udp) i want accept incoming packet on port 4000 but reject outgoing packet on port 4000 so could you give me a solution please ? thank you PS : I hope you undersatnd waht I want because im frecnh and my

Yes this scenario works on my 2 systems which are at LAN. I made one system as server (192.168.0.20) and registered from other system... it is fine but now there is a different scene. actually there is a registered user named abc at system1 (192.168.0.20) having context [payasyougo] which is used to do outbound calls. we want to use this user's context and account so that when we register

Hello, I'm using the stable amd64 port of Debian Linux. I installed (the latest) nut-2.0.1-4 and nut-usb packages for utilizing an APC Smart-UPS 1500 USB. I tried "apcupsd" first but "nut" makes an even more sophisticated impression on me and has more security options. I had problems with the newhidups driver. It didn't find a device with matching VendorID. And

Hi I Have a problem: I'm sharing ~600 folders on my samba server: [SHARE 192.168.0.20] comment = Private share for host 192.168.0.20 browseable = yes writable = yes path = /var/archives/USERS/192.168.0.20 public=yes hosts deny = 192.168. EXCEPT 192.168.0.20 [SHARE 192.168.0.21] comment = Private share for host 192.168.0.21 browseable = yes writable = yes path =

Hi Harry, Has much has I like Centos and RH for big sophisticated setup, it would not be my first choice for your project. For 25 systems and if you want this done without spending to much time, Clarkconnect would by my first choice for server side OS (#2 would be SME). For me CentOS x64 is #1 choice for enterprise (+500 users with Terabytes of storage ) sever solution. If you have little

Hi all, I have managed to setup a Fedora 7 box with 3 ethernet cards and two ADSL modem/routers from different suppliers as LARTC recommends. I am able to direct traffic for specific internal IPs either to one or the other ADSL line. However, I am faced with two problems I am struggling for the solution: 1. I have opened a few ports on the ADSL router/firewalls to talk to internal hosts; say when

Thanks Vardan, I will like to know if this scenario can work when peer is not having fixed ip and we use host = nasir.server.com ? also I have set insecure=invite,port what if i use insecure=no thanks again. Message: 24 Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:52:14 +0500 From: Vardan <hvardan71 at gmail.com> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Dialing a SIP Peer without using register strin To:

Hi My first post get no answer :=<, i post new with new elements. I have two Asterisk server, running on Asterisk 1.6: SRV1 = 192.168.0.5 on Asterisk 1.6.1.4 SRV2 = 192.168.0.20 on Asterisk 1.6.1.8 I want create a link for exchange call. on Srv1: iax.conf: [general] bindport=4569 bindaddr=0.0.0.0 language=fr bandwidth=low jitterbuffer=no forcejitterbuffer=no autokill=yes

Unreplied message when i try to connect to an internal system I''ve set up a shorewall 3.0.5 system on Fedora core 4 When i want to connect from an external computer to one in my network it does not reply. I connect from 212.19.195.160 to 212.178.64.74 trough port 8080 The rule i made is: DNAT  net   loc:192.168.0.20:80  tcp  8080 - 212.178.64.74 (and 192.168.0.20 can be reached

Hi, I am new to this list and this is first time i m posting here. please help me out currently I am working on dialing a sip peer on an asterisk server from 2nd asterisk server. scenario is like this. on my system i am using this peer in sip.conf. [abc] type=peer username=abc secret=mysecret host=192.168.0.20 context=default dtmfmode=rfc2833 ;restrictcid=no canreinvite=yes

Dear list, I am facing really a mysterious problem with samba. I am using clarkconnect server where samba-3.0.25b-1.1.cc is installed. I have created some samba users and windows XP user can share their samba files and folders without any problem. But the problem which happened here third time is auto deletion of files and folders !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! An user ( FROM XP) simply deleted 2

Dear All, Thank you very much to every one on the list for the sincere suggestion and recommendations I have received amazing response from all; I will try to recap a) Use CentOS for server infrastructure and fedora 8 on the workstations b) Use K12ltsp-terminal server and all the client machines as thin clients c) Use CentOS as Server and Ubuntu as client OS d) Use

I don't know.. It seems that anyone had try to made work tinc with lollipop. Even googoling i don't found anything about this argoument. Andrea Squeri Il 27/mar/2015 06:55 "Tatsuyuki Ishi" <ishitatsuyuki at gmail.com> ha scritto: > SELinux is considered as the biggest problem. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015, 22:37 Andrea Squeri <andrea.squeri at gmail.com>

Yes. The problem is lollipop. I tried to install tinc on my brother's device which mount a cyano 10.1( android 4.2.2) and it works. I don't understand which is the problem with lollipop. Is there a firewall that block the packets? Andrea Squeri If you are running Lollipop / Android 5.x on your Nexus 5, then you are probably seeing the same issue I was with it. lollipop seems to change

Hi, First sorry for my bad English. I made a vpn wtih tinc for link my home and my two office. In Addition I want to configure my android device to link with my vpn. The topology of the net is this: cubox(a linux machine in my home with vpn address 192.168.0.20) groppalbero (a linux machine in my second office with vpn address 192.168.0.40) imac(a mac machine in my first office with vpn address