similar to: Creating llvm/DebugInfo/Msf folder

I actually regret doing all caps for PDB, and there seems to be mixed use of all caps / rolling caps even with dwarf (some places say DWARF, others say Dwarf). I don't feel too strongly aside from the minor inconvenience of having to change thousands of occurrences where I already used rolling caps though :-/ On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:52 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:

Is anyone else seeing.... Updated to revision 277264. Summary of conflicts: Tree conflicts: 2 Tree conflict on 'include/llvm/DebugInfo/Msf' > local dir edit, incoming dir delete or move upon update ... Tree conflict on 'lib/DebugInfo/Msf' > local dir edit, incoming dir delete or move upon update in a 'svn update' on llvm trunk? Strangely these errors

Some background: A while back while working on code to read / write PDB files, I came up with Yet Another Stream Abstraction. Note that LLVM already has a few. Off the top of my head, theres: 1) `MemoryBuffer` and its associated class hierarchy 2) `raw_ostream` and it's associated classes. 3) `DataExtractor` which is used for reading from a StringRef. There's probably more, and

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > We've been pursuing the direction of writing PDBs from scratch in > llvm/lib/DebugInfo/PDB/Raw and related directories. It might be interesting > to have code that talks to MSPDB140.dll in LLVM, but we really want LLD to > be able to produce its output on any platform. > I completely agree

The bot has been failing its CMake step for a while now. Probably fallout from renaming Msf to MSF. Can somebody get this straightened out? It's one of the bots that run VS2013 AFAICT which makes it useful to me. Thanks, --paulr

The latter. Unfortunately we need to get physical access and delete the checkout. I'm afraid reverting will just reintroduce the problem and re-break all the bots that people already took the time to fix, since going from MSF -> Msf is the same as going from Msf -> MSF On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:55 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > So, the MSF rename managed to break

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > I wrote most of the pdb code in llvm so far. As Reid suggested, if you > look in DebugInfo/PDB/Raw there is a significant amount of code dealing > with msf files and raw pdb streams. If you build the llvm-pdbdump tool you > can run it with the "raw" subcommand to dump lots of low level

Hi all, I've recently been doing some work on a novel language that uses LLVM for optimization and machine codegen. The language is self-hosted, I'm building my third iteration of its garbage collector, and also writing a thin IDE to stretch the language a bit. Needless to say, debugging is a major concern for me. My primary experience (and primary development focus) is Windows-centric,

I was just trying to build lldb-6.0 from source (and had previously successfully build llvm-6.0, clang-6.0, and lld-6.0 from source), but received a compile error while using both just cmake and cmake+ninja Does this look familiar to anyone? In file included from llvm/lldb-6.0.0.src/source/API/SystemInitializerFull.cpp:89: In file included from

I'm still trying to figure this out. On one of my machines it went away after a clean install even though my configuration is exactly the same. I'll let you know once I know more. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:28 PM Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> wrote: > + Jonas who hit the same bug recently. > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Eric Gorr via llvm-dev >

+ Jonas who hit the same bug recently. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Eric Gorr via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I was just trying to build lldb-6.0 from source (and had previously > successfully build llvm-6.0, clang-6.0, and lld-6.0 from source), but > received a compile error while using both just cmake and cmake+ninja > > Does this look familiar to

Sounds like we have an issue in the CodeView headers related to a duplicate symbol. While this doesn't entirely surprise me after seeing the error, I'm also not sure why this problem is only just happening now. Ultimately what's happening is we have this enumeration: enum class RegisterId : uint16_t { ... CR3, ... }; But your termios.h file also has a #define for CR3. I guess one

Ok just tried on Win 7 and the same problem occurs. I am building with : cmake -G "Ninja" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_USE_CRT_RELEASE=MT -DLLVM_ENABLE_TIMESTAMPS=ON -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON -DLLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY=ON -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="ARM;X86" -DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE=$python_exe -DLLVM_BUILD_TESTS=ON -DLLVM_LIT_TOOLS_DIR=C:/cygwin64/bin fwiw compiler-rt is

IIUC you are mainly wanting to test LLD's PDB generation. Obviously a test suite plugged in under clang/test is not a good fit for that. It could arguably fit into the LLD project, but separating it out as a more end-to-end integration project a-la test-suite seems like a much better idea. Moving debuginfo-tests seems like a way to get a project in place with the right layering and maybe

FWIW, this test is passing for me on Windows 7 with Visual Studio 2015 (debug build). 59> Running all regression tests 59> -- Testing: 23734 tests, 32 threads -- 59> 59> Testing Time: 634.19s 59> Expected Passes : 22821 59> Expected Failures : 160 59> Unsupported Tests : 753 59> lit.py: lit.cfg:195: note: using clang:

>The pdb reading code relies *very heavily* on Windows APIs can you make shure not to have any windows api stuff in the pdb-reader interface so its easy to - if someone wants to - implement an windows-api independent version (support reading under linux etc.) because the pdb format needs to be analysed anyway for writing pdb information on compile/link (in the future) Am 29.01.2015 um 19:20

Hi, This might be interesting since it seems to be the only LLVM test failing with VS 2015: FAIL: LLVM :: DebugInfo/PDB/pdbdump-symbol-format.test (7377 of 14212) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: DebugInfo/PDB/pdbdump-symbol-format.test' FAILED ******************** Script: -- llvm-pdbdump -symbols C:\cygwin64\home\ismail\src\llvm\test\DebugInfo\PDB/Inputs/symbolformat.pdb |

On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 10:22:17 AM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > I've been working on adding pdb reading support to llvm. This started as > a tool for dumping info from a pdb (similar to llvm-dwarfdump), which has > been checked in and currently has limited support for dumping pdb. > > There's still more to be done on the pdb dumping tool, but at

Haven't got to this but would like to take a look/review it before it goes in. *skimming over some of the description* Sounds like 'stream' might not be the right terminology - since they return pointers into data that (I think) remains valid for the life of the stream? (this also makes me wonder a bit about memory usage if the cross-block operation is used a lot (causing

> On Jan 29, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > > I've been working on adding pdb reading support to llvm. This started as a tool for dumping info from a pdb (similar to llvm-dwarfdump), which has been checked in and currently has limited support for dumping pdb. > > There's still more to be done on the pdb dumping tool, but at this