similar to: Old mailing list links broken.

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:59 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tanya, > > I was spelunking through bugzilla and ran into an old mailing list link > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2006-January/005137.html > (found in PR36). > > I expect this

Hi, Chris I get a new PostDominanceFrontier class by combinating the code of PostDominanceSet/PostDominanceTree/PostDominanceFrontier FunctionPasses. It works very well. BTW: Why the PostDominanceFrontier FunctionPasses does not use the formal argument in runOnFunction(Function &)? Does it gets the Function from PassManager? Thank you. Xia >On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, xia_yimin wrote: >

Hi, In my work applying -flto to Chrome, I need to set some names to be skipped by the InternalizePass; otherwise, the linking stage fails (i.e., when building the chrome binary). In the past, I had a tiny patch that I hadn't submitted to LLVM: it was something like: Index: Internalize.cpp =================================================================== --- Internalize.cpp (revision

On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Michael McCracken wrote: > > You're right that FunctionPass's are not supposed to have state > > (something that many people overlook :) ), however, for now, nothing > > will break if it does have state, and this is really the only way > > around this. > > I'm not sure if I can do this. The pass I'm writing is writing info >

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > What were you thinking? I increased it to 5MB.. but it sounds like you > have 26MB attachments? > Is 50MB doable? -- Sean Silva > > -Tanya > > On Jul 13, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Tanya, could you increase the max attachment size

On Aug 5, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Michael McCracken wrote: > >> Hi, I have a hopefully quick question. I'm writing a Pass that needs >> to >> see a whole module at a time and keep some state, so I subclassed >> Pass. >> However, I want to be able to see the Loops in each Function. Roughly, > > ok. > >>

Trying to download Release 2.7 i get the response: The requested URL /releases/2.7/clang-2.7.tar.gz was not found on this server. The requested URL /releases/2.7/clang-2.7-amd64-freebsd8.tar.gz was not found on this server. The requested URL /releases/2.7/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7-i386-freebsd8.tar.gz was not found on this server. The requested URL /releases/2.7/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7-amd64-freebsd8.tar.gz was

These are all fixed. Sorry for the mistake.. I blame lack of sleep ;) -Tanya On Apr 27, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Pitr wrote: > Trying to download Release 2.7 i get the response: > > The requested URL /releases/2.7/clang-2.7.tar.gz was not found on this server. > The requested URL /releases/2.7/clang-2.7-amd64-freebsd8.tar.gz was > not found on this server. > The requested URL

When analysing a function "fn", my FunctionPass needs some PostDominanceFrontier information of functions which are called by function "fn". getAnalysis<PostDominanceFrontier>() cannot give the information, because it only gives the PostDominanceFrontier information of "fn", not the PostDominanceFrontier information of functions called by "fn".

LLVMers, Traffic on llvm-dev is quite high and while the majority of it is LLVM development related, there are many other mails related to clients or other projects. Having an llvm-users doesn't make any sense, but perhaps having a llvm-clients or llvm-general mailing list may help offload some of the traffic. What do people think? Any other suggestions to divide up the traffic and reach

Hey LLVMers, I could not get the docs for LLVM 2.1. I guess the doxygen link at http://llvm.org/releases/2.1/docs/index.html is pointing to the newest version of LLVM docs. The link was: <a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/doxygen.tar.gz">tarball</a> best, Fernando

Dear all, Where can we find the doxygen document of old version llvm(such as 1.9 or 2.0)? -Wink -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Where-to-find-the-doxygen-of-old-llvm-tp27367108p27367108.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, > Where can we find the doxygen document of old version llvm(such as 1.9 or > 2.0)? if it exists at all then I guess you can find it in the docs subdirectory of the LLVM 1.9 (etc) release tarball. Ciao, Duncan.

I had a very odd problem recently that manifested itself like this.. C:\rails_apps\cookbook>ruby script/console Loading development environment. c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:21:in `require__'': no such file to load -- ./script/../config/ ../config/environment (LoadError) from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/ custom_require.rb:21:in

On Jul 23, 2019, at 9:17 AM, JF Bastien via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> On Jul 23, 2019, at 8:30 AM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> As a very frequent explorer of history, I really don't think this is >> as big an issue as it may seem. Even absent refactorings, you often >> run into the

On August 4th (~9AM PDT, exact time TBD), all LLVM related mailing lists will move to a new mailing list server and will change to listname at lists.llvm.org. LLVMDev will probably change to LLVM-Dev to preserve consistency. This means a couple of things: 1) All mailing lists will be down on August 4th. We anticipated at least the full day of downtime (hopefully less if things go well). 2) SVN

I'm running a headless Linux installation (FC11) on Amazon EC2 and need to run some console-based (no window) 32-bit DOS executables... I've been running this fine for the past couple years on another installation (FC10) with v1.1.23, by setting the "TERM" environment variable to "xterm" and I believe it ran the "tty" graphics-driver and worked just great.

Hi, some big files are regularily updated on server A. Rsync should sync that with Server B. If rsync starts in the middle of an upload process, will it copy that incomplete file to Server B? First tests showed it will. How can this be avoided? Comments on rsync-usage with big files and very active users would be very appreciated! Thanks! Peter

Has anyone an idea why i always get

The transition to the new server is complete. If you find something is broken or not working correctly, please send mail to the list (llvmdev or cfe-dev). The demo page and docs should be fully functional. Thank you for your patience during this time. Thanks, Tanya