similar to: Can some categories be added to the "LLD" bugzilla product?

Done. -Tanya > On Jun 23, 2016, at 2:37 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tanya, > > Could you add 4 basic categories "COFF", "ELF", "MachO",under the "LLD" product? (we already have "All Bugs" so really only 3 categories need to be added). That will help keep things organized. > > -- Sean Silva

Thanks! On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > Done. > > -Tanya > > > On Jun 23, 2016, at 2:37 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Tanya, > > > > Could you add 4 basic categories "COFF", "ELF", "MachO",under the "LLD" > product? (we

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > What were you thinking? I increased it to 5MB.. but it sounds like you > have 26MB attachments? > Is 50MB doable? -- Sean Silva > > -Tanya > > On Jul 13, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Tanya, could you increase the max attachment size

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:59 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tanya, > > I was spelunking through bugzilla and ran into an old mailing list link > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2006-January/005137.html > (found in PR36). > > I expect this

Tanya, could you increase the max attachment size limit on LLVM's bugzilla? -- Sean Silva On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:19 AM, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > This sounds like a bad idea. Let's just increase the limit in bugzilla > instead? The limit is just a configuration option... > > On Jul 13, 2016 3:56 AM, "Sean Silva via llvm-dev" <

Hi Tanya, I was spelunking through bugzilla and ran into an old mailing list link http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2006-January/005137.html (found in PR36). I expect this link to be broken since our servers are not on that domain. No big deal, just change it to lists.llvm.org: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvmdev/2006-January/005137.html Looks like that doesn't exist, as the

Hi! There were several new spam entries in Bugizlla, created from previously created accounts. I think will be good idea to delete them as well as block spammers accounts : Report IDs: 30192, 30191, 30187, 30186, 30185, 30182, 28766, 28717, 28715, 28714. Eugene.

> On Jul 5, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > I'm curious about the requirement to provide birth date—what's that about? Liability reasons because we serve alcohol at the reception. I can change to age if thats better or ask if someone is under 21 but you may still be asked show ID if a server is unsure. -Tanya > Thanks, >

All, llvm.org <http://llvm.org/> (including SVN and all web services) will be down on Thursday 7/9 starting at 12PM PDT. The server will be moved to a new location with a new IP address (192.17.58.186). It may take awhile for the DNS changes to propagate (TTL is 1 hour). I will send email to the list again shortly before the move begins. Thank you for your patience! -Tanya

Call for Talks, Tutorials, BoFs, Panels, and More! All developers and users of LLVM and related sub-projects are invited to present at the 2016 LLVM Developers’ Meeting. We are looking for the following proposals: - Technical Talks on LLVM Infrastructure (~30 minutes) - Technicals Talks on related sub-projects (Clang, etc) - Talks of uses of LLVM in academia or industry - Talks on new projects

Your are invited to attend the 2016 LLVM Developers’ Meeting <http://llvm.org/devmtg/2016-11/> on November 3-4 in San Jose, CA. Registration will open today, July 1, at 5:00PM PDT. You may register here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2016-llvm-developers-meeting-bay-area-tickets-26043992282 <https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2016-llvm-developers-meeting-bay-area-tickets-26043992282>

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > > On May 29, 2015, at 10:08 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > Large part of the difficulties in development of the current LLD comes > from over-generalizataion to share code between pretty much different file > formats. > > ISTM the problem that's been described

All, The server that runs the mailing lists will be down for maintenance starting Friday Dec 18th at 10:30PM PST. I do not expect a long downtime, but please keep this in mind if you see any issues with the lists during this period. I will send an email once I am finished. No other services should be affected. Thanks, Tanya

All, I'm needing volunteers to help moderate the sessions of the LLVM Developers' Meeting. All you need to do is introduce the speaker, make sure the speaker stays on time, and run Q&A at the end (run a microphone, select people, etc). Its a pretty easy job, but critical for our meeting to run smoothly. Lightning talks are slightly different in that you will moderate each 5 minute

All, I'm needing volunteers to help moderate the sessions of the LLVM Developers' Meeting. All you need to do is introduce the speaker, make sure the speaker stays on time, and run Q&A at the end (run a microphone, select people, etc). Its a pretty easy job, but critical for our meeting to run smoothly. If you are interested in moderating, please send me your top 2 session choices.

Replying to the thread, not just the email since I was on vacations. First, note that there is a nomenclature issue. A section in ELF/COFF is closer to an atom in MachO than a MachO section IMHO. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet, but sure as hell creates a lot of confusion :-) On 4 May 2015 at 18:05, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 4, 2015, at 1:16

The 2017 LLVM Developers’ Meeting relies on volunteers to keep things running smoothly. Moderators are critical to this as they keep speakers on track and facilitate Q&A after the talk. I’m looking for community members who would be attending specific talks anyway, to volunteer to moderate the session. If you are interested in volunteering, please respond to this email with your first and

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> There was some interest from a number of a few people about adding >> support for embedded linker options to ELF. This would be an extension >> that

The deadline is tonight! Get your proposal in :) -Tanya > On Jul 27, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > > Just a reminder that this deadline is coming up. Submit your proposal today! > > -Tanya > >> On Jun 29, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>> wrote: >>

On 6 May 2016 at 22:57, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > The major weapon of harassers is arguing whether something is actually > harassing. It is difficult to enforce a CoC if you have to have a month long > nasty argument about whether it was violated. It burns out people like you. The major weapon about enforcers is *not* wanting to argue. Harassment is a very