similar to: apt repositories back!

Le 23/06/2016 à 19:13, Renato Golin a écrit : > On 23 June 2016 at 17:56, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-foundation > <llvm-foundation at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Thanks to the LLVM Foundation and Tanya, the apt repository is now back: >> >> http://apt.llvm.org/ > Nice! Thanks everyone! > > Are we filtering multiple hits, or are we just assuming people will be

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Le 09/03/2016 à 21:44, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > >> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 > >> and 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it >

Hi Sylvestre, On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9 > packages are going to be green by next week. Any updates on that? It appears that Precise repositories are now in order, but all the others (and, most importantly, Trusty) are still not updated. Also, 3.9 packages are not mentioned on the web page,

On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 and > 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it might need > more work for old Ubuntu (back port of cmake) Hi Sylvestre, Thank you for the clarification! Any ETAs on when the APT repositories are going to be updated with LLVM 3.8 & 3.9 builds?

Le 12/03/2016 à 14:15, Johan Engelen a écrit : > > > > I'm not sure how clean / dirty of a solution you'd be okay with, but > > I'd just point out that CMake developers provide working binary > > tarballs for Linux with every release at > https://cmake.org/download/ . > > So, if you are not a purist and/or need the CMake backport for

Le 09/05/2016 à 16:59, Paweł Bylica a écrit : > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:46 PM Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org > <mailto:sylvestre at debian.org>> wrote: > > Le 09/05/2016 à 07:34, Paweł Bylica a écrit : > > llvm-3.8-dev is broken: > > > > CMake Error at /usr/share/llvm-3.8/cmake/LLVMConfig.cmake:178 > (include): >

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:46 PM Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote: > Le 09/05/2016 à 07:34, Paweł Bylica a écrit : > > llvm-3.8-dev is broken: > > > > CMake Error at /usr/share/llvm-3.8/cmake/LLVMConfig.cmake:178 (include): > > include could not find load file: > > > > /usr/share/llvm/cmake/LLVMExports.cmake > Brad King helped me

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 08:10 Amaury SECHET via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'd like to shime in here. These apt repository used to contain packages > named llvm-3.8-tools containing, amongst other things, the lit python > library used to test llvm. It seems that it went away recently and I have > travis build failing because of this. > > What is

Le 29/03/2016 à 14:17, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > Hi Sylvestre, > ri > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9 packages are going to be green by next week. > > Any updates on that? Yes, most of the remaining issues are fixed (the sync to llvm.org/apt was disabled). I will send a summary soon.

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 09:38 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd be happy to do it, but this is a bit much high level for me to be > actionable. Can you explain me what I should do to reintroduce them int he > debian packaging ? > On the CMake side, I'm not sure. I think it's just a matter of using the "install()" functions to install them

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello, > Le 31/05/2016 à 19:27, Anton Korobeynikov a écrit : > > TL;DR: APT repo switched off due to excessive load / traffic > > > > Recently we realized that APT repo generates almost 95% of I/O on > > llvm.org and more than 40% of network bandwidth alone.

On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote: > I did some cleanup of the repositories today (Sunday). > I remove all the 3.3 snapshots which were wrong (they were older than the > official 3.3 release and not maintained). > I didn't think that anybody was using them (Looks like I was wrong, sorry!). No problem, we were just using them

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 06/11/2016 07:52 PM, Johan Engelen via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > > > http://llvm-apt.ecranbleu.org/apt/ > > > >

After some thinking on this idea, it would not work because I need / want to use Debian/Ubuntu package to do the build and clang 3.4 is not built on these architecture :( So, if I bootstrap clang 3.4, I will have a dependency on libstdc++ 4.8... :/ On 25/12/2013 22:23, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison wrote: > Hi Sylvestre, > > The easiest is probably to have a dependency to (and use)

Hi Sylvestre, it seems the code coverage runs are not updated since a couple of months. http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/tools/polly/lib/Support/SCEVValidator.cpp.gcov.html The last run was on 2017-05-20 02:07:48. Are you still maintaining these? Is this on purpose? Any chance this could be fixed? Best, Tobias

Renato Golin wrote: > On 2 February 2014 21:59, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org > <mailto:sylvestre at debian.org>> wrote: > > Maybe I missed a thread but is there any plan to rename > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/ to > a llvm.org <http://llvm.org> address ? > > > +1. > > Though, I can't push more work unto others, so

llvm-3.8-dev is broken: CMake Error at /usr/share/llvm-3.8/cmake/LLVMConfig.cmake:178 (include): include could not find load file: /usr/share/llvm/cmake/LLVMExports.cmake llvm-3.7-dev is ok. Why is it so error prone for so many years? On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 11:31 PM Amaury SECHET via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > So, it turns out that the secret sauce to

On 02/12/2019 15:21, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > yaml-bench is shipping in libclang-common-9-dev Ok possible. Though, it adds an unnecessary 46MB to my docker image. > It should be indeed in llvm-9-dev instead. This would hide the problem, right. I am not sure it's is a good solution. Where can we review the build process for the apt packages? On 02/12/2019 15:21, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:

On 1 June 2016 at 19:20, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > It seems there is already a repo for OpenSUSE [2]. We could try to > incorporate support for other distros there are make our own given > that we actually want to support multiple LLVM versions too. Looks like they're all 3.8.0 based... > If you want I could try to hack together a proof of concept using the

Hello, I did some cleanup of the repositories today (Sunday). I remove all the 3.3 snapshots which were wrong (they were older than the official 3.3 release and not maintained). I didn't think that anybody was using them (Looks like I was wrong, sorry!). You are not happy about the 3.4 packages ? Sylvestre On 06/10/2013 19:52, Renato Golin wrote: > Sylvestre (CC'd) might know where