similar to: 3.8.1-final has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged 3.8.1-rc1, testers can begin testing. -Tom

On 23 June 2016 at 10:56, Bernhard Rosenkränzer <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > This caused our tarball generation scripts to mess up and name the tarballs > 3.8.0 -- I've fixed the script to look at CMakeLists.txt instead and now (so > far) all is good, but while configure is still there it should probably > reflect the version info correctly. Hi Bero, If anything,

Hi, I just tagged LLVM 4.0.1-rc3, and it's ready for testing. If all goes well, we will do the final release on Monday. -Tom

Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc3 was just tagged. This is a release candidate in the real sense: if nothing bad comes up in testing, this is what the release is going to look like. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp (use the /data/testers-uploads/ directory) and let me know what issues remain. I know we're a little bit behind schedule, but hopefully we can get to 'final'

We're now using it as the main compiler in the OpenMandriva development builds -- no issues so far (after rebuilding a couple of key packages for testing). ttyl bero On 17 January 2018 at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. > > I know there are still open

I am pleased to announce that LLVM 7 is now available. Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#7.0.0 The release contains the work on trunk up to SVN revision 338536 plus work on the release branch. It is the result of the community's work over the past six months, including: function multiversioning in Clang with the 'target' attribute for ELF-based x86/x86_64 targets,

I am pleased to announce that LLVM 7 is now available. Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#7.0.0 The release contains the work on trunk up to SVN revision 338536 plus work on the release branch. It is the result of the community's work over the past six months, including: function multiversioning in Clang with the 'target' attribute for ELF-based x86/x86_64 targets,

Dear testers, The final version of 4.0.0 was just tagged (from the 4.0 branch at r297335). There were no changes after rc4. Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp. For others following along: this means 4.0.0 is complete, but it will take a few days to get the tarballs ready and uploaded to the web page. I will send the announcement once everything's done. Many thanks for

Hi, On the OpenMandriva side, x86_64 passes all checks. We're having some problems with other architectures though (see below): x86_64 succeeded, packages are here: https://abf.openmandriva.org/build_lists/76792 i586 fails to build, but this seems to be an issue with 3.8.1 (which we're using to build 3.9): /usr/bin/clang++ -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS

Alex, I have built ubuntu binaries for the last couple of releases. I apologize -- I haven't built those new binaries yet, I only have uploaded the SLES ones. I have an ubuntu 14 tarball that I'll upload today. I will work on getting ubuntu 16 or 17 next. The dpkg/APT repos might be a good substitute, though. Hans, apologies -- I should've asked to hold the 7.0.0 release for

Hans, I'd like to make sure that I'm using the right LLVM version. I tried to download LLVM 8 from the link in your email by cloning this repository: git clone https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git When I do llc --version, it says LLVM 9.0.0 instead of 8.0.0 LLVM (http://llvm.org/): LLVM version 9.0.0svn DEBUG build with assertions. Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

cmake ../llvm/ -G "Unix Makefiles" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Debug" -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../install -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="XXX" -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='lld;clang;' ________________________________ From: Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 2:21 AM To: Josh Sharp Cc: Brian Cain; via llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLVM 8.0.0

Hi, I had a quick look at that link and it seems to be a linker internal error. Presumably we're triggering a bug in the system toolchain. FWIW, my mipsel build on a Debian Jessie machine (binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1) successfully completed test-release.sh. I'm currently running the tests. Here's the relevant bit of the log from your link: cd

> Test suite is green but I'm seeing two libc++ test failures when running check-all. What tests are failing? On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Nikola Smiljanic via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Uploaded Fedora and openSUSE binaries. Test suite is green but I'm seeing > two libc++ test failures when running check-all. I'm pretty sure these were >

Thanks, Brian I tried enabling both the lld and the clang projects by adding -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='lld;clang' into the cmake command. After the build completed successfully, I can see ld.lld in my bin folder but not clang. Is it supposed to be in another folder? Thanks. ________________________________ From: Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Dear testers, 8.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r351980). It took a little longer than planned, but it's looking good. Please run the test script, share your results, and upload binaries. I'll get the source tarballs and docs published as soon as possible, and binaries as they become available. Thanks, Hans

OK, so, if I understand, the tag is at 3.8.1, but there is no source drop available for download? Del From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 4:12 PM To: Del Myers <delmyers at microsoft.com> Cc: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] llvm 3.8.1 Release Hi Del, Yes, the tag is for the latest stable release. It's

Ubuntu 16: a2a2768b04e1d561e6f9a1a2d525eda7aae18624 clang+llvm-7.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:12 PM Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Uploaded ubuntu 14: > > dec5ca53043c80c1c6e90c0473df84f0182d80af > clang+llvm-7.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:58 PM Brian Cain <brian.cain

We just wanted to check to see if they are real bugs first. We will report them if they are not already fixed. Thanks. Del From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 12:07 AM To: Del Myers <delmyers at microsoft.com> Cc: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] llvm 3.8.1 Release Did you report the bugs? It would be a

Hi, First off, I'm new to this mailing list so please forgive me if I'm posting to the wrong one. I have a quick question about the llvm 3.8.1 release. http://llvm.org/ indicates that 3.8.1 was released on June 15, but there is no download link for it? Also, when you sync to the 3.8.0 tag, in svn or the git mirror, it seems that there are commits passed the 3.8.0 release. Does that mean