similar to: function call replacement

Hi, Thanks both of you for the help. I just missed that Create function had many optional arguments... sorry for that. However my problem wasn't coming from here (IRBuilder CreateCall function still return a pointer to CallInst so I just added 2 times the call?). I didn't wanted to detail the all issue previously because I knew I had a problem with my syntax. So here's my problem: I

Hi, This is probably more of a standard C++ question instead of an actual LLVM question, but here it goes anyway. I'm trying to invoke the following constructor: CallInst::CallInst(Value *Func, InputIterator ArgBegin, InputIterator ArgEnd, const Twine &NameStr, BasicBlock *InsertAtEnd); My code is: using namespace llvm; void replaceByClone(Function *f, CallInst *I){ Function *clone =

Hi, I'm a PhD student doing phase ordering as part of my PhD topic and I would like to ask some questions about LLVM. Executing the following command to see what passes does OPT execute when targeting a SPARC V8 processor: /opt/clang+llvm-3.7.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-15.10/bin/llvm-as < /dev/null | /opt/clang+llvm-3.7.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-15.10/bin/opt -O3 -march=sparc -mcpu=v8

Hi, I have the following instruction in my IR- %call2 = call i8* @strcpy(i8* %1, i8* %2) #2 I intend to change call to strcpy with strncpy. I have included the following code in runOnFunction, so that when it is strcpy's turn to be invoked, strncpy is invoked instead. Assuming I* is the strcpy instruction, CallInst* x=new

Hi everyone, I am trying to write a pass, that finds some instructions and replaces them with my intrinsics, but I am having problem understanding, how this should be done. Let's say I have this instruction: %tmp14 = load i32* getelementptr ([32 x i32]* @gpregs, i32 0, i64 28) and i need to read the load's operands and replace it by let's say: %tmp14 = call i32

HI , I understand that the standard C library functions are executed using the native library of the host machine. ( for example when we execute a bytecode to extract the profile info ) Is it possible to extract for each standard library function that is executed , the arguments that the function is called with. For example if printf ("%d", some_int ) when called during runtime

Hi,I have the following instruction in my IR-%call2 = call i8* @strcpy(i8* %1, i8* %2) #2I intend to change call to strcpy with strncpy. I have included the following code in runOnFunction, so that when it is strcpy's turn to be invoked, strncpy is invoked instead.Assuming I* is the strcpy instruction,CallInst* x=new

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:32 AM, ihusar<ihusar at fit.vutbr.cz> wrote: >                //now i need to create an instruction that represents a call to a intrinsic >                Function* FIntr = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(&M, Intrinsic::regread_i32); > >                // here it fails: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::Value*): >                //Assertion

14:50 < cbosdonnat> pino|work, do you know how I could get ?tar passed from one function to the other in the checksum code? 14:51 < pino|work> cbosdonnat: pass it as it is, ie ?foo 14:52 < cbosdonnat> pino|work, indeed, works better... I didn't know I could use the ? in the calling function and I used the ~ instead 14:53 < pino|work> ? is handled like an option type

Hi I want to insert some functions into the llvm bitcode ir files. So I use IRBuilder and CreateCall(). But it how error : inlinable function call in a function with debug info must have a !dbg location. I don't know what DebugLoc should I give the new CallInst to setDebugLoc. I Create this CallInst , so this CallInst doesn't hava so-called "DebugLoc" mapping to the source

On 14 July 2016 at 20:07, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Pierre Gagelin via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to use the CloneFunction from llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h > and I don't understand how the ValueToValueMapTy argument should be > initialized. For instance,

Hello everyone, is there any way to replace an instruction inside LLVM that is more elegant than creating a new one, replacing uses and deleting the old one if I only want to modify the type? It is generally not a big deal, but the issue gets really messy if I am in the middle of iterating over uses and start deleting some of them... I hope I could describe my problem well enough ;) Regards,

Hi, I try to follow the use of the value yielded by a malloc call. Here follows a concrete example of what I expect and what I get. define void @main() #0 { entry: %ptr = alloca i8*, align 8 %call = call noalias i8* @malloc(i64 10) #2 store i8* %call, i8** %ptr, align 8 %0 = load i8*, i8** %ptr, align 8 call void @free(i8* %0) #2 ret void } It is a simple program that allocates and

Ralf Karrenberg wrote: > Hello everyone, > > is there any way to replace an instruction inside LLVM that is more > elegant than creating a new one, replacing uses and deleting the old one > if I only want to modify the type? It is generally not a big deal, but > the issue gets really messy if I am in the middle of iterating over uses > and start deleting some of them... >

Hi, I'm Ryo Ota. I'm using LLVM 3.8.1. I have a quesion about inlining function in C++ API. I'd like to inline some functions in a module in the same way as `opt -inline` command. But my C++ code didn't work what I want to do. For example, by using `opt -inline` command,`main.ll` is converted into the `inlined.ll`(`opt` command worked what I want to do) [main.ll (Not inlined)]

Hi llvm-dev, Every now and then, when building a direct ``CallInst`` either from IRBuilder or through ``Create*``, I have a latent bug because the calling convention (CC) expected by the function is not set on the call, and I need to manually call ``setCallingConv``. Now, from LangRef#calling-conventions, The calling convention of any pair of dynamic caller/callee must match, or the

Hello everyone, I wanted to copy a function from one file to another. The file that I wanted to copy the function into contains a function with the same name and same number of instructions. I decided to just replace the instructions with those of the other function. I am doing all of this from within a function pass. *1.* I created a function pass in which I extract a function using

On 11/19/2014 4:05 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Sahasrabuddhe, Sameer > <sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com <mailto:sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com>> > wrote: > > 1. Update the synchronization scope field in atomic instructions > from a > single bit to a wider field, say 32-bit unsigned integer. > > > I

Hello, I have a call to ReplaceInstWithInst(Instruction *From, Instruction *To) inside of a for loop iterating through a BasicBlock::iterator. On the very next pass after I replace the instruction, the iterator appears to be invalidated. Is this supposed to happen or am I doing something silly? Is there a more appropriate way to do this? Thanks, -Justin

Hello. I'm writing an LLVM pass that is working on LLVM IR. To my surprise the following LLVM pass code generates optimized code - it does copy propagation on it. Value *vecShuffleOnePtr = Builder.CreateGEP(ptr_B, vecShuffleOne, "VectorGep"); ... packed_gather_params.push_back(vecShuffleOnePtr); CallInst *callGather =