similar to: [GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - Mid term report

Hello, Attached is the proposal that I have submitted. I would be grateful for any and all feedback provided. Many Thanks, Scott -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: GSoc Proposal 2016 - Scott Egerton.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 391088 bytes Desc: GSoc Proposal 2016 - Scott Egerton.pdf URL:

Hello Anna, I've been looking into compiling a list of all of the false positives in the current Capture Tracking Analysis, but I'm having a bit of trouble getting my head around it all. I feel like I understand it at a theoretical level but jumping into the implementation is quite daunting. I would appreciate any advice you could give to point me in the right direction. Many thanks,

Hi Phillip, I've been looking into the Capture Tracking Improvements and I was wondering if there was any research/documentation that you know of that I could use as background reading? Many thanks, Scott

Hey Scott, There has been quite a lot of research on capture tracking (aka escape analysis) for Java and other dynamic languages. See e.g.: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/HotSpot/EscapeAnalysis http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/vm/performance-enhancements-7.html http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=320384.320386 Nuno -----Original Message----- From: Scott Egerton via

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > (+CC LLVM dev - I'd dropped it in my original reply unintentionally and > just noticed.) > > On 06/07/2016 01:35 PM, Philip Reames wrote: > >> (This was written in a rush. There may be mistakes; if so I'll try to >> correct later.) >> >> At the

Derf, Jean-Marc, I've already pinged Conrad, but just a reminder that the Google SoC mid-term evaluations are due tomorrow, US time. I can't check through the web app whether you've completed one, so please confirm with me if you have so I can stop nagging. :-) -r

Hello Rishabh, As per our previous discussion, we will talk each week now about the project. Please update the timeline/todo/journal accordingly so that we can check the status on this saturday for this week. Please remember that this half of the programme is smaller and hence we would need to be very punctual about the goals. Regards, Parth. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi Rishabh, As per our last progress meeting, I am off for some days and as now its the time to mid-term evaluation, it would be better to generate a progress report. For that, you should first commit the code as it is and then write 2 to 3 page summary explaining the deliverables so far and then the future plan. Tomorrow is the last day, so better by tomorrow morning, send this across and by

Dear LLVM Community, This is a brief summary of what I've done so far for CFL-AA, and what I plan to do next. tl;dr: CFL-AA is getting saner. Low-hanging fruits on its improvement have almost been picked up. I can either make CFL-AA more precise (with certain performance cost), or teach other passes to capitalize on CFL-AA better as the next step. Comments and suggestions are more than

On 2 August 2014 00:40, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > If memory serves me well (it doesn't), these are the list of things we > agreed on making, and their progress: > > 1. Performance-specific test-suite: a group of specific benchmarks > that should be tracked with the LNT infrastructure. Hal proposed to > look at this, but other people helped

Further to my email below, I have just realised that I forgot to include the specification of L and R. Hence, the code needs to include the following additional lines at the start;- L<-7.5e6 R<-2.5e6 Apologies for any confusion caused! Best regards, Tony > On 12 Jul 2017, at 10:03 AM, HUL-Anthony Egerton <aegerton at huntingtonunderwriting.com> wrote: > > I am trying

Tony, I?m not sure what exactly you?re trying to do, but you're not really taking advantage of vectorization in your R code. I've tried to clean it up a little. The clamped lognormal is almost always 0 or L? That seems a little odd. You seem to be using the inverse cdf method of drawing samples. That's not necessary in R for standard probability distributions. You may want to do a

On 13 November 2013 13:14, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > b) evaluate if the main running time of the benchmark is caused by > running > > code compiled or by something else, e.g. file IO. Programs > dominated by > > file IO shouldn't be used to track performance changes over time. > > The proposal to resolve this is

Hi, This is a summary of what was discussed at the Performance Tracking and Benchmarking Infrastructure BoF session last week at the LLVM dev meeting. At the same time it contains a proposal on a few next steps to improve the setup and use of buildbots to track performance changes in code generated by LLVM. The buildbots currently are very valuable in detecting correctness

Dear All, I would like to seek for help on this issue: 1. I set par(mfrow=c(2,2)), hoping to plot 4 subgraphs in a whole graph 2. Each subgraph has its own x,y axes and each has x-axis label and y-axis label 3. moreover, subgraphs in the left column of the whole graph are all 3D, and have z axes and labels for z axes 4. subgraphs in the right column of the whole graph are all 2D 5. In each

Hello, I'm running an algorithm for graph structural cohesion that requires a depth-first search of subgraphs of a rather large network. The algorithm will necessarily be redundant in the subgraphs it recurses to, so to speed up the process I implemented a check at each subgraph to see if it's been searched already. This algorithm is very slow, and takes days to complete on a

Great summary Kristof ! I do not know how frequent is the addition of a new benchmark, but this would disrupt the compile time measurement. On the other hand, we just want to see a (hopefully negative) slope and ignore steps due to new benchmark being added. Cheers, -- Arnaud On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com>wrote: > Hi, > > > >

Hi, Next week at the developers meeting, I'm chairing a BoF session on improving our performance tracking and benchmarking infrastructure. I'd like to make the most out of the 45 minute slot. Therefore, I'd like to start the discussion a bit earlier here, giving everyone who can't come to the BoF a chance to put in their 2 cents. At the same time, I hope this will also give me a

We''re getting ready to launch our new social networking application and need some development/sysadmin help in the run up to release. We''ve got lots of small jobs, fixes and a few last second integrations to be done, plus some general sysadmin. Ideally, you''d have good recent experience of developing on 2.1.0 with a mix of plain html and AJAX. Any experience on mobile

Please e-mail me off list if you''re looking for a contract->perm position in LA, close to LAX near Boeing and the other defense companies. The role is fairly senior and involves mostly Linux and Unix systems. Puppet experience is a win, also is OpenBSD for routing/firewalling. More details to be given off list if you contact me. -- Joe McDonagh AIM: YoosingYoonickz IRC: joe-mac