similar to: question about ARM 32 big endian

I made a mistake here, I get zero same as you. I want to fix it to get correct value. On 16.03.2016. 19:28, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: >> On 2016-Mar-16, at 09:39, Strahinja Petrovic via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Optimizer doesn't know how to calculate the object size when it finds condition that cannot be eliminated. There is example:

Optimizer doesn't know how to calculate the object size when it finds condition that cannot be eliminated. There is example: ----------------------------------------------- #include<stdlib.h> #define STATIC_BUF_SIZE 10 #define LARGER_BUF_SIZE 30 size_t foo(int flag) { char *cptr; char chararray[LARGER_BUF_SIZE]; char chararray2[STATIC_BUF_SIZE]; if(flag) cptr =

Hi! This is an artifact of how LLVM works. Essentially, LLVM detects that `var` is unused and deletes it before it tries to lower the `llvm.objectsize` (which is what clang lowers `__builtin_object_size` to) call to a constant. While this isn't ideal, I don't think it realistically a problem, because `var` must be otherwise unused for this behavior to occur, and the whole purpose of

Hi, So the Variable Argument Handling Intrinsics section of the LangRef (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#variable-argument-handling-intrinsics) lists an example that segfaults. Try the following on x86_64: -- 8< -- define i32 @test(i32 %X, ...) { ; Initialize variable argument processing %ap = alloca i8* %ap2 = bitcast i8** %ap to i8* call void @llvm.va_start(i8* %ap2) ; Read a

I'm wonder if anyone happens to have a simplier (slower) version of bsd-snprintf.c. It seems NeXT 3.3 (unsure about 4.2) is missing mprotect(). If I could get something to replace that for a while and fix some of theses utmp in login.c issues I may have a rough port NeXT to black hardware.=) Thanks

Hi, I am using llc (llvm 2.9) to generate the MIPS assembly, but failed when compile any codes with va_start()/va_end()/va_arg(). Here is the minimal step to reproduce the failure: llvm-gcc-4.2 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc llc -march=mips hello.bc -o hello.s llc show this erroe message: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0xa1873a0: ch = vaend 0xa187290:1, 0xa185ae0, 0xa187318 [ID=38] 0xa185ae0:

Hi, I have question about __builtin_object_size behaviour. LLVM for __builtin_object_size function doesn't calculate correct value when pointer is used only in __builtin_object_size function call, and never after that. For this case LLVM as result generates 0 or -1 depends of second argument of __builtin_object_size function. Is this correct behaviour or it should work as gcc (gcc

When I use clang on an x86-64 to spit out the LLVM, like this clang -O -S -emit-llvm varargstest.c where varargstest.c looks like this int add_em_up(int count, ...) { va_list ap; int i, sum; va_start(ap, count); sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < count; i++) sum += va_arg(ap, int); va_end(ap); return sum; } I see LLVM that looks like it's been customized for the x86-64, versus

Hi, Chris Lattner wrote: > All the non-vastart calls can be anywhere. va_end in particular codegens > to a noop on all targets llvm currently supports, fwiw. > Things go well, except for the following (pathological?) C program: int va_double_sum(int count,...){ int i,sum=0; va_list ap; va_start(ap,count); for(i=0;i<count;i++){ sum+=va_arg(ap,int); } va_end(ap);

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Bram Adams wrote: >> You'd have to change it to something like: >> void foo(int X, ...) { >> P = va_start(); >> bar(X, P); >> } >> >> void bar(int X, valist P) { >> use(P); >> } > > Can the other va_...-intrinsics be used in bar as were the "P = > va_start" in bar? The va_start probably is

Hi, Op 3-okt-06, om 20:48 heeft Chris Lattner het volgende geschreven: > You'd have to change it to something like: > > void foo(int X, ...) { > P = va_start(); > bar(X, P); > } > > void bar(int X, valist P) { > use(P); > } Can the other va_...-intrinsics be used in bar as were the "P = va_start" in bar? The va_start probably is unnecessary

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Leo Chen. <leo.q.chen at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am using llc (llvm 2.9) to generate the MIPS assembly I would suggest trying trunk; there have been a lot of improvements recently to the MIPS backend. -Eli > but failed > when compile any codes > with va_start()/va_end()/va_arg(). > > Here is the minimal step to reproduce the

Hi everyone, I'm interested in variadic functions and how llvm handles them. I discovered that the Clang frontend is doing a great job at lowering the va_arg (precisely __builtin_va_arg) function into target dependent code. I have also seen the va_arg function that exist at IR level. I found some information about va_arg (IR one) that currently does not support all platform. But since 2009,

On Aug 15, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Leo Chen. <leo.q.chen at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am using llc (llvm 2.9) to generate the MIPS assembly > > I would suggest trying trunk; there have been a lot of improvements > recently to the MIPS backend. > I agree. Also, make sure you're using a MIPS

Hello again! We have fetched the latest llvm sources from repository and the original problem has went away. Though now we are facing a new problem with interpreter on the following c code: -------------- #include <stdarg.h> #include <stdio.h> void doTheThing(int dummy, ...) { va_list ap; int z; va_start(ap, dummy); while( (z = va_arg(ap, int))!=0) { printf("==

Hi, I've discovered a problem on Sparc processors (specifically, LEON, but I suspect but can't verify that it also happens on all Sparc processors). The problem is, or appears to be with using double values in Sparc (32 bit). Specifically, double values are not being loaded into registers correctly within a function using va_args. Only half the value is loaded (i.e. 32, rather than 64

FYI, looks like support for Racoon is ending. Does anyone have any experience with the version in ipsec-tools ? ---Mike >Racoon users, > >This is the announcement that the kame project will quit providing >a key management daemon, the racoon, and that "ipsec-tools" will become >the formal team to release the racoon. >The final release of the racoon in the

Hi, number three, where I first thought it was a GCC bug but is apparently bad code in klibc. Submitted with permission: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533#c6 Patch attached again (sorry) not just because that is easier with my mail system but also to keep original author intact. bye, //mirabilos -- > emacs als auch vi zum Kotzen finde (joe rules) und pine f?r den einzig >

Hi, My nova-compute nodes was running libvirt 0.9.13 and QEMU 1.0, after libvirt was upgraded to 1.2.2, the VMs launched by libvirt 0.9.13 can't attach volume any more, i.e. "nova volume-attach <vm-uuid> <volume-uuid>" doesn't work. But before the libvirt upgrade, the same VM can attach volume disk. I did some debuging and find that, it failed in QEMU when try to

Hi everyone, I'm implementing varags handling for PPC32 with the ELF ABI. It is largely more complicated than the Macho ABI or x86 because it manipulates a struct instead of a direct pointer in the stack. You can find the layout of the va_list struct at the end of this mail. A VAARG call requires a lot of computation. Typically the C code for va_arg(ap, int) is: int va_arg_gpr(ap_list