similar to: SegFault creating a ExecutionEngine

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches similar to: "SegFault creating a ExecutionEngine"

2014 Jun 12
2
[LLVMdev] problems to recompile LLVM version 3.4.1 with gcc48 / SuSE 13.1
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:57:46AM +0200, Armin Steinhoff wrote: > > Hi, > > first problem was: > > >FileManager.cpp:311:21: error: range-based ‘for’ loops are not allowed > >in C++98 mode > >for (auto & fe: SeenFileEntries) { > >^ > >FileManager.cpp:312:14: error: request for member ‘getValue’ in ‘fe’, > >which is of non-class type ‘int’
2012 Jan 25
1
[LLVMdev] PLEASE help with Alias Analysis initialization assertion at the end of my pass
Yes, it is a pass. Here is a very general overview of the file structure as far as the AA is concerned. LLVM is not my strong-suit, I do hardware simulators, not compilers. using namespace llvm; char RelRecovery::ID = 0; static RegisterPass<RelRecovery> X("relRecovery", "Reliability transformation for lightweight recovery"); void
2013 Oct 02
2
C++ debugging help needed
I've had reports lately about segfaults in the rgl package. I've only been able to reproduce these on Linux. I am not so familiar with C++ details, so I have a couple of questions way down below. But first some background info. One recipe to recreate the crash works with a new version 5.0-1 of the mixOmics package: > library(mixOmics) > example(pca) This crashes with
2012 Jan 23
1
[LLVMdev] Assertion `AA && "AA didn't call InitializeAliasAnalysis in its run method!"' failed.
Hello all, I am working with someone else's LLVM code, which is about 8 months old. Part of this pass involves AliasAnalysis, and I'm getting the above assertion when the pass completes. The dump is as follows: -------------------------------- Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0xf7fdf430 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) bt #0 0xf7fdf430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xf602e921 in
2012 Jan 25
0
[LLVMdev] PLEASE help with Alias Analysis initialization assertion at the end of my pass
Griffin Wright wrote: > > Hello all, > > I really, really, really need your help. This is my third email now, > please don't ignore me! I understand this must be a trivial thing, but > I've ground to a halt, and REALLY need some guidance. Please see below for > the context of my problem. I'm not trying to be a waste of time, but I'm > desperate here.
2012 Jan 25
2
[LLVMdev] PLEASE help with Alias Analysis initialization assertion at the end of my pass
Hello all, I really, really, really need your help. This is my third email now, please don't ignore me! I understand this must be a trivial thing, but I've ground to a halt, and REALLY need some guidance. Please see below for the context of my problem. I'm not trying to be a waste of time, but I'm desperate here. I have a getAnalysisUsage method which does the following
2018 Feb 25
0
segfault calling SDL_Init with FFI/ MCJIT
I'm getting a segfault when I call `SDL_Init( SDL_INIT_VIDEO )` within the MCJIT.  If I compile the same program to an EXE I don't have a problem. Are there any general restrictions, or known issues, with loading a library like SDL2 via the MCJIT?  (LLVM-3.8 still) The stack trace, from GDB, is below. I noticed the error actually happens deep inside a transitively loaded GL drive module,
2014 Jun 10
6
[LLVMdev] Suggestions for optimizations
Hello! I was trying to optimize our automatically generated backend for Open RISC and for this purpose I went through the gcc torture testsuite. There are many programs that are better optimized by LLVM, but some are much better optimized by gcc 4.9. The main limitations were is loop unrolling and structures handling. Differences can be best seen e.g. when compiling for an
2011 Feb 02
2
Centos + python + sqlalchemy + mysql
I am trying to use the following set (all from standard repositories): centos (5.5) + python 2.6 + sqlalchemy + mysql. However while running my script I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./oraping2.py", line 43, in <module> main() File "./oraping2.py", line 23, in main db = create_engine('mysql:///u1oraping at
2012 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Function inline pass core dump when removing a function
Guys, In this case, I wanted to hack globalopt pass to require ScalarEvolution analysis. It seems ScalarEvolution is not released after globalopt pass, and it will hold a reference to the basicblocks. Later when the function is removed(by inline pass), coredump happened: opt test.bc -mem2reg -globalopt -inline -loop-unroll -debug-pass Details -o out.bc >& log So it seems to me if a pass
2017 Jan 04
3
dovecot-pigeonhole running external script ends with signal 11
Hi Stephan Am 03.01.2017 um 21:12 schrieb Stephan Bosch: > Since you're using LMTP, you could try to run the lmtp service from > command line in GDB. In essence, this looks as follows (you will need to > run this as the mail user, e.g. vmail, or you can run it as root): > > $ gdb --args /usr/lib/dovecot/lmtp I did so and it seems that libc.so.6 throws the error as I get the
2012 Mar 21
1
enableJIT() and internal R completions (was: [ESS-bugs] ess-mode 12.03; ess hangs emacs)
Hello, JIT compiler interferes with internal R completions: compiler::enableJIT(2) utils:::functionArgs("density", '') gives: utils:::functionArgs("density", '') Note: no visible global function definition for 'bw.nrd0' Note: no visible global function definition for 'bw.nrd' Note: no visible global function definition for 'bw.ucv'
2017 Jan 03
3
dovecot-pigeonhole running external script ends with signal 11
Hi, I'm running a dovecot 2.2.26 (self compiled) on a Centos 7. I have a sieve script which should run an external script (in filter mode) that encrypts the mail using the users pub key. I configured 90-plugin.conf as follows plugin { sieve_plugins = sieve_extprograms sieve_extensions = +vnd.dovecot.filter sieve_filter_bin_dir = /etc/dovecot/sieve-filters
2016 Oct 04
28
[Bug 98039] New: KMail crash on starting (nouveau-related)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98039 Bug ID: 98039 Summary: KMail crash on starting (nouveau-related) Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee:
2013 Jul 24
1
NFS deadlock on 9.2-Beta1
Two machines (NFS Server: running ZFS / Client: disk-less), both are running FreeBSD r253506. The NFS client starts to deadlock processes within a few hours. It usually gets worse from there on. The processes stay in "D" state. I haven't been able to reproduce it when I want it to happen. I only have to wait a few hours until the deadlocks occur when traffic to the client machine