similar to: Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?)

>On 3 June 2016 at 10:03, George Rimar via llvm-dev ><llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> +1. I am also bit concerned here. Never used git, but it is fine, I am ready to learn, >> but now when I am using TortoiseSVN the only command line I am using is for creating the >> final patch (though I think that is also available in GUI). >> And what I heard in this

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > I think we should start two other threads: one about git tooling on Windows > and one about infrastructure problems migrating to git. Some developers on Windows prefer to use GUI tools like TortoiseSVN to command line tools for version control. The last time I tried TortoiseGit on Windows (which was

Sourcetree is pretty good on windows, and I hear ok things about Git Extensions. I have not used the GitHub app though. I typically use Sourcetree to view the logs, and command line for everything else. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Craig, Ben via llvm-dev Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 10:01 AM To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev]

One of the things that may taint my prior analysis... At the time I was last evaluating Windows git GUIs, I was looking for something that would make handling .patch and .diff files easier. In particular, if a patch didn't apply, I really wanted to get some visual indication of which hunk failed, and some interface to resolve the conflict. I didn't find any tools that handled that

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 3 June 2016 at 10:03, George Rimar via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> +1. I am also bit concerned here. Never used git, but it is fine, I am ready to learn, >> but now when I am using TortoiseSVN the only command line I am using is for creating the

On 6/3/2016 9:31 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev wrote: > On 3 Jun 2016, at 15:01, Aaron Ballman via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> The end result is "go use the console". Whether that's because people >> recommend it or because it's the only option is immaterial. The fact >> remains, we don't have to do that today, we may have to

IMO, if we're switching to git, we should just be clear up front that all committers will be expected to switch to git as well -- or at least, if they want to use something else (e.g. mercurial's git bridge/etc), that it's their own problem. It is truly NOT that big an imposition to require the use of git. And knowing how to use git at at least a basic level is an important skill for

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 31 May 2016 at 21:24, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: >> Are we sure that github's svn integration works with common tools on >> Windows, like TortoiseSVN? > > That's a good question. Can you try them out and report back? >From my very simple testing,

On 31 May 2016 at 21:24, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > Are we sure that github's svn integration works with common tools on > Windows, like TortoiseSVN? That's a good question. Can you try them out and report back? cheers, --renato

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Folks, > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but > many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos

Hello List. I'm cross posting this from svn-users, as I'm not sure whether this is an CentOS specific issue. Perhaps someone here has an idea of what's going on? ----------------------------- I got a fresh install of CentOS 5.2 x32, svnserve, version 1.5.5 (r34862), here is my svnserve.conf file [general] anon-access = none auth-access = write realm = isf [sasl] use-sasl = true

Since you asked for comments... Personally, I'm disappointed to see Speex moving to Git from Subversion. I had just recently learned how easy it is to track progress of Speex using TortoiseSvn. That being said, I'm sure Jean-Marc knows best what the issues may be. How many people are expected to commit on this project this year? -mjc

This output is much more interesting. Can you show the full cmake command line or set of variables that you configured? 1. I don't know why it's saying it requires Perl. Perl is absolutely not a requirement 2. I don't know why it's trying to build openmp or compiler-rt. I guess it depends on how you configured CMake. openmp I don't think is well supported (perhaps not even

Here are some notes/observations I've done on my setup that works for me. Hopefully it will be added to some r-forge documentation/wiki. I use: Windows Vista Business SP2 32bit TortoiseSVN 1.6.7 (Build 18415 - 32 Bit , 2010/01/22 17:55:06) PuTTY v0.60 (with Pageant v0.60) I have a deprecated r-forge project ('r-oo') that I will use through out. My r-forge username is

Folks, There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. TL;DR: GitHub + git submodules [1] could replace all the

I personally find this email thread very hard to follow and read (this isn’t anyones fault.. its just a lot of replies). I am sure others do as well. I think it would be good to have a form/survey of some sort that can get feedback from users such as: who they are, how they use LLVM/contributions/etc, if they are pro-github move, how it impacts them, etc. People could then submit their feedback

I installed TortoiseSVN, created a local repository at c:/instantrails/SVNRepository. I have an app that I want to put into SVN and also do a freeze_edge for, but I''m not sure how. I ran command ''rake freeze_edge'' and got the error: ERROR: Must have subversion (svn) available in the PATH to lock this application to Edge Rails rake aborted! Any advice or links to a

I am at a new job where my sys admin installed R in linux and it does run when I log in as a user. I am on linux 2.1.2 but i'm not sure if it''s redhat etc ( but i doubt this matters for my question ). The alias put in my .envfile ( for the kshell ) is R = "/ms/dev/fsf/R/2.0.0/install/.exec/ia32.linux.2.4.lib6/lib/R/bin/exec/R" and my R_HOME is

I''ve looked for DIFF tools for OSX but haven''t found anything good yet. Tried guiffy (http://www.guiffy.com) but it''s very slow and the folder comparison doesn''t indicate a change until you drill down to the level with the difference which kinda defeats the purpose. I''m missing TortoiseSVN and the diff tool that comes with it. Any suggestions for

I''m trying to deploy a rails app with no success. I can execute: ''rake remote_exec ACTION=setup'' but when I try to execute : ''rake deploy'' I got this error: loading configuration c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/switchtower-0.10.0 /lib/switchtower/recipes/standard.rb loading configuration ./config/deploy.rb executing task deploy transaction: start