similar to: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello, > Le 31/05/2016 à 19:27, Anton Korobeynikov a écrit : > > TL;DR: APT repo switched off due to excessive load / traffic > > > > Recently we realized that APT repo generates almost 95% of I/O on > > llvm.org and more than 40% of network bandwidth alone.

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 06/11/2016 07:52 PM, Johan Engelen via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > > > http://llvm-apt.ecranbleu.org/apt/ > > > >

> TL;DR: APT repo switched off due to excessive load / traffic > > Recently we realized that APT repo generates almost 95% of I/O on > llvm.org and more than 40% of network bandwidth alone. During last 2 > weeks the main services on llvm.org (svn, git, bugzilla) had serious > problems with overall connectivity. > > We decided to temporary switch APT repo off to see if this

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-foundation" <llvm-foundation at lists.llvm.org> > To: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "clang-dev Developers" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>, > llvm-foundation at lists.llvm.org > Cc: "Sylvestre Ledru" <sylvestre at debian.org> > Sent: Tuesday, May 31,

On 1 June 2016 at 19:20, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > It seems there is already a repo for OpenSUSE [2]. We could try to > incorporate support for other distros there are make our own given > that we actually want to support multiple LLVM versions too. Looks like they're all 3.8.0 based... > If you want I could try to hack together a proof of concept using the

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Le 09/03/2016 à 21:44, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > >> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 > >> and 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it >

On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 and > 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it might need > more work for old Ubuntu (back port of cmake) Hi Sylvestre, Thank you for the clarification! Any ETAs on when the APT repositories are going to be updated with LLVM 3.8 & 3.9 builds?

Le 12/03/2016 à 14:15, Johan Engelen a écrit : > > > > I'm not sure how clean / dirty of a solution you'd be okay with, but > > I'd just point out that CMake developers provide working binary > > tarballs for Linux with every release at > https://cmake.org/download/ . > > So, if you are not a purist and/or need the CMake backport for

On 1 June 2016 at 17:59, Dan Liew via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'm not surprised by the heavy load but a little more notice would > have been nice. This has broken our CI builds for KLEE [1]. We (the > KLEE developers) can fix this by moving our CI to run in an Ubuntu > 14.04 environment where the LLVM version we currently require is part > of the

Hello all, For CI testing of LDC with LLVM trunk we use CircleCI, which offers Ubuntu Trusty 14.04. We use apt.llvm.org, but the latest update of the "nightly" package is now more than a month ago. Previously the update rate was once a week, which was OK as it meant that we only had a few days of test breakage after an API change (and after a dev updated LDC to build with a locally

Le 29/03/2016 à 14:17, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > Hi Sylvestre, > ri > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9 packages are going to be green by next week. > > Any updates on that? Yes, most of the remaining issues are fixed (the sync to llvm.org/apt was disabled). I will send a summary soon.

Hello everyone I was just porting a project to build against the LLVM 9 apt packages and noticed that the issue I filed and explained during the release phase in https://llvm.org/PR43035 still persists: CMake Error at /usr/lib/llvm-9/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake:1323 (message):   The imported target "yaml-bench" references the file      "/usr/lib/llvm-9/bin/yaml-bench"

Dear LLVM community, I would like to know whether it has already been discussed to provide pre-built snapshots of Clang/LLVM trunk available for download. This used to be available through llvm.org/apt, but since this is down I don't know of any alternative but to build it from source. My use case is to test the Boost.Hana library against Clang trunk on Travis, where building from source is

Hi Sylvestre, On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9 > packages are going to be green by next week. Any updates on that? It appears that Precise repositories are now in order, but all the others (and, most importantly, Trusty) are still not updated. Also, 3.9 packages are not mentioned on the web page,

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 08:10 Amaury SECHET via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'd like to shime in here. These apt repository used to contain packages > named llvm-3.8-tools containing, amongst other things, the lit python > library used to test llvm. It seems that it went away recently and I have > travis build failing because of this. > > What is

On 2 June 2016 at 19:50, Richard Gomes via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > wrote: > Since the APT repository is down... everything under that location is > unavailable, including the instructions on how I could build/install > LLVM/clang from sources. Could you guys advise, please? > You can quickly start here... http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html at least until we

On 1 June 2016 at 18:34, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > I've used PPAs as a developer before and I hated the experience but > that's probably because launchpad (the web interface) is garbage. Indeed! It seems that the people relying on our apt service wouldn't bother much where we move it to. So, I'm ok with any solution that replaces the functionality.

Hi all, I use the nightly builds of LLVM in my Travis CI configuration. Travis CI is based on Ubuntu 12.04 precise. Currently, I am not able to install llvm-3.4 and llvm-3.4-dev. The error is always: $ sudo apt-get install llvm-3.4 llvm-3.4-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package llvm-3.4 E: Couldn't find any

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:46 PM Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote: > Le 09/05/2016 à 07:34, Paweł Bylica a écrit : > > llvm-3.8-dev is broken: > > > > CMake Error at /usr/share/llvm-3.8/cmake/LLVMConfig.cmake:178 (include): > > include could not find load file: > > > > /usr/share/llvm/cmake/LLVMExports.cmake > Brad King helped me

Hello, Thanks to the LLVM Foundation and Tanya, the apt repository is now back: http://apt.llvm.org/ It will take a few days before all the builds go green [1]. Please update your configurations. Sylvestre [1] The same build infra is still used but the builds were failing because using llvm.org/apt too.