similar to: Live interval analysis on LLVM IR (not on Machine instructions)

You can use: http://www.rw.cdl.uni-saarland.de/~grund/papers/cgo08-liveness.pdf -----Original Message----- From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Alex Susu via llvm-dev Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 9:39 PM To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [llvm-dev] Live interval analysis on LLVM IR (not on Machine instructions) Hello. Could you

Hello. Thank you very much for the research paper. I will try to make use of the algorithms it presents. I just want to add that I found a 3rd party project doing dataflow analysis for LLVM IR at https://github.com/rohitjha/cse231-proj2. As written at http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~r1jha/#five , the project's description is: "Dataflow Analysis Framework for LLVM This is an

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Michelle Strout wrote: > Those of us working on the OpenAnalysis project have been looking at > LLVM recently (excellent job on the website BTW). Thanks! I'm just one of the many people who have worked on it though, the praise belongs to them as much as it does to me. :) > This includes researchers at Rice, Argonne, and LLNL. Great! > John Mellor-Crummey

Hi, I am trying to identify duplicate values in a column in a date frame. The duplicated function identifies the duplicate rows in the data frame but it only does this for the second record, not both records. Is there a way to mark both rows in the data frame as TRUE? dfA$dups<-duplicated(dfA$Value) dfA Site State Value dups 929 VA 73 FALSE 929 VA 73 TRUE 930 VA 76 FALSE 930 VA 76 TRUE 931

Committed in r159281. -Anshu On 6/26/2012 3:04 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: > Hi Anshu, > > I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just > checked it. Could you please commit it? > > Ivan > > On 26/06/2012 04:44, adasgupt at codeaurora.org wrote: >> Hi Ivan, >> >> Sorry, I should have been more explicit in my last email. The

Hi Anshu, I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just checked it. Could you please commit it? Ivan On 26/06/2012 04:44, adasgupt at codeaurora.org wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Sorry, I should have been more explicit in my last email. The patch looks > good to me. Please check that it applies on trunk and go ahead and commit. > > Thanks > -Anshu

Hi, I've refactored the DFA generator in TableGen because it takes too much time to build the table of our BE and I'd like to share it. We have 15 functional units and 13 different itineraries which, in the worst case, can produce 13! states. Fortunately, many of those states are reused :-) but it still takes up to 11min to build the entire table. This patch reduces the build time to

Hi Anshu, Thanks again for your feedbacks. On 24/08/2012 17:01, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > Hi Ivan, > >> I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I >> updated the patch. It should be ok now. >> Thanks Anshu! >> >> I've recently added more functional units to our Schedule.td and the >> generation time became painfully long. In

Hi Anshu, Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass and I fixed the violation of column numbers. On 15/06/2012 21:31, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > The patch looks good to me. I have a couple of minor comments: > > +void State::AddInsnClass(unsigned InsnClass, > Add a top level comment describing the function > > + std::map<State*,

Hi Anshu, Just in case you have forgotten this thread ;-). Is this patch ok to commit or does it not apply to trunk properly ? I can fix it if that's the problem. Ivan On 20/06/2012 19:33, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > > > Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass > and I fixed the violation of column numbers. > > Great. Looks good to me. > >

I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I updated the patch. It should be ok now. Ivan On 27/06/2012 21:42, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > Committed in r159281. > > -Anshu > > > On 6/26/2012 3:04 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: >> Hi Anshu, >> >> I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just >> checked it.

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Michelle Strout wrote: > I think some clarifications and examples would be helpful. No problem. :) > - LLVM is in SSA. It is in SSA before alias analysis has been > >>>> performed. With OA, it has been mentioned that the SSA generation > >>>> is > >>>> incorrect because it doesn't take alias analysis information into

Dear list members, when I create a data.frame containing an array I had expected, that I get a similar result, when subsetting it, like having a matrix in a data.frame. But instead I get only the first element and not all values of the remaining dimensions. Differences are already when creating the data.frame, where I can use `I` in case of a matrix but for an array I am only able to insert it in

So is this an expected behavior or is it a bug which should be reported somewhere else? Thanks! Georg? ? ? Gesendet:?Dienstag, 09. Mai 2023 um 19:28 Uhr Von:?"Bert Gunter" <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> An:?"Georg Kindermann" <Georg.Kindermann at gmx.at> Cc:?"Rui Barradas" <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt>, r-help at r-project.org Betreff:?Re: [R] data.frame

I think the following may provide a clearer explanation: subs <- c(1,3) DFA <- data.frame(id = 1:3) ar <- array(1:12, c(3,2,2)) ## yielding > ar , , 1 [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 4 [2,] 2 5 [3,] 3 6 , , 2 [,1] [,2] [1,] 7 10 [2,] 8 11 [3,] 9 12 ## array subscripting gives > ar[subs,,] , , 1 [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 4 [2,] 3 6 , , 2

Hi Ivan, The patch looks good to me. I have a couple of minor comments: +void State::AddInsnClass(unsigned InsnClass, Add a top level comment describing the function + std::map<State*, std::set<Transition*, ltTransition>, ltState> stateTransitions; You should be able to use SmallSet here. Also, this line exceeds 80 columns. On a related note, is the CachedTable mechanism in

Hi Ivan, > I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I > updated the patch. It should be ok now. > Thanks Anshu! > > I've recently added more functional units to our Schedule.td and the > generation time became painfully long. In fact, the main problem was > in writeTableAndAPI(). I propose another patch to fix it: > - Fixed memory leaks. > -

I really don't know. I would call it a request for extended capabilities of [.data.frame, rather than a feature or bug. But maybe wiser heads than mine who monitor this list can sort it out. -- Bert On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 8:52?PM Georg Kindermann <Georg.Kindermann at gmx.at> wrote: > So is this an expected behavior or is it a bug which should be reported > somewhere else? >

> Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass and I fixed the violation of column numbers. Great. Looks good to me. > IMO, it wil be nice to keep it alive for performance comparisons. Given the overall performance > is rather determined by transition searches on the current state, for small DFA tables may not be a win > and it may still be the case for

Hi Ivan, Sorry, I should have been more explicit in my last email. The patch looks good to me. Please check that it applies on trunk and go ahead and commit. Thanks -Anshu > Hi Anshu, > > Just in case you have forgotten this thread ;-). Is this patch ok to > commit or does it not apply to trunk properly ? > I can fix it if that's the problem. > > Ivan > > On