Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "C++ CreateConstGEP questions"
2011 Feb 01
2
[LLVMdev] Convenience methods in ConstantExpr et al
I notice that there's a lot of inconsistency in the various LLVM classes
with respect to convenience methods. Here's some examples:
For creating GEPS, IRBuilder has:
CreateGEP (2 overloads)
CreateInBoundsGEP (2 overloads)
CreateConstGEP1_32
CreateConstInBoundsGEP1_32
CreateConstGEP2_32
CreateConstInBoundsGEP2_32
CreateConstGEP1_64
CreateConstInBoundsGEP1_64
2011 Feb 02
0
[LLVMdev] Convenience methods in ConstantExpr et al
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
> I notice that there's a lot of inconsistency in the various LLVM classes
> with respect to convenience methods. Here's some examples:
>
> For creating GEPS, IRBuilder has:
>
> CreateGEP (2 overloads)
> CreateInBoundsGEP (2 overloads)
> CreateConstGEP1_32
>
2011 Feb 02
2
[LLVMdev] Convenience methods in ConstantExpr et al
Talin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com
> <mailto:viridia at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I notice that there's a lot of inconsistency in the various LLVM
> classes with respect to convenience methods. Here's some examples:
>
> For creating GEPS, IRBuilder has:
>
> CreateGEP (2 overloads)
>
2015 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Question about NoWrap flag for SCEVAddRecExpr
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>
>> Base is treated as unsigned so 0xff…ff + 1 would be 0x100…00
>
> This is the part I was missing, thanks for pointing out the FAQ. So
> the infinitely precise address computed by a GEP is
>
> zext(Base) + sext(Idx0) + sext(Idx1) … ?
Yes, that is the way I read it.
2015 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Question about NoWrap flag for SCEVAddRecExpr
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 12:48 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Base is treated as unsigned so
2001 Mar 04
1
bubblebabble patch
Hi,
Here is a patch that adds the possibility of displaying key fingerprints
in the bubblebabble format used by ssh.com ssh implementations.
I hope it makes its way into the source.
--- ./openssh-2.5.1/key_original.h Sun Mar 4 00:47:55 2001
+++ ./openssh-2.5.1/key.h Sun Mar 4 00:57:57 2001
@@ -36,6 +36,17 @@
KEY_DSA,
KEY_UNSPEC
};
+
+enum digest_type {
+ DIGEST_TYPE_SHA1,
+
2007 Jul 23
1
Error using Rd2dvi on OSX
Hi,
I run R 2.5.1 on Mac OS 10.4.10 and fail to build a package manual.
Below is the transcript. The problem is a "pdflatex: command not found"
error but I think that I have a fully working latex install (installed
with iInstaller) as I use TeXShop with no problem.
Could someone help?
Jean-Pierre
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] Convenience methods in ConstantExpr et al
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote:
> Talin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com
>> <mailto:viridia at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I notice that there's a lot of inconsistency in the various LLVM
>> classes with respect to convenience methods. Here's some
2011 Feb 04
3
[LLVMdev] ConstantBuilder proposal
Here's a sketch of what I am proposing for ConstantBuilder.
I'd like feedback on naming conventions, doc comments, etc.
//===-- llvm/Support/ConstantBuilder.h - Builder for Constants --*- C++
-*-===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
2013 Mar 20
3
highlight overlapping region of two densities
Hi all.
I would like to highlight overlapping regions of two densities and I could
not find a way to do it.
Here is the sample code:
myd <- c(2,4,5, 4,3,2,2,3,3,3,2,3,3,4,2,4,3,3,3,2,2.5,
2, 3,3, 2.3, 3, 3, 2, 3)
myd1 <- myd-2
plot(range(density(myd)$x, density(myd1)$x), range(density(myd)$y,
density(myd1)$y), type = "n")
lines(density(myd), col=1, lwd=4)
2005 Feb 10
2
Problem with "R CMD Rd2dvi": Rd.sty not found
Hi,
I run into a problem with "R CMD Rd2dvi" command: it gives me "File `Rd.sty'
not found" error (See the output message on the bottom). I get the same
error when running "RCMD check". My system is: Windows 2000, R version
2.0.1, MiKTeX version 2.4. I do have a Rd.sty file in R_HOME/share/texm
directory.
I looked through newsgroups for any related discussions
2010 Apr 09
1
Rsge: recursive parallelization
In principle, I'd like to be able to do something like this:
sge.parLapply(seq(10), function(x) parLapply(seq(x), function(x) x^2))
In practice, however, I have to resort to acrobatics like this:
sge.options(sge.remove.files=FALSE)
sge.options(sge.qsub.options='-cwd -V')
sge.parLapply(seq(10),
function(x) {
sge.options(sge.save.global=TRUE)
2010 Oct 27
2
Why is cpu-to-node mapping different between Xen 4.0.2-rc1-pre and Xen 4.1-unstable?
My system is a dual Xeon E5540 (Nehalem) HP Proliant DL380G6. When
switching between Xen 4.0.2-rc1-pre and Xen 4.1-unstable I noticed
that the NUMA info as shown by the Xen ''u'' debug-key is different.
More specifically, the CPU to node mapping is alternating for 4.0.2
and grouped sequentially for 4.1. This difference affects the
allocation (wrt node/socket) of pinned VCPUs to the
2015 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Question about NoWrap flag for SCEVAddRecExpr
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 6:17 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if inbounds can be used to prove <nuw>. If an object
> %OBJ is allocated at address -1 then "gep inbounds %OBJ 1" is not
> poison, but the underlying computation unsigned-overflows.
I think that this should yield poison per langref because the signed
2019 Apr 04
2
single-threaded code-gen and how to make it support multi-thread
Hi llvm-dev,
Our code base has a ancient copy of llvm (ver 3.5.1), and it uses the LLVM
code gen for some domain-specific language.
The previous dev left a global lock around the usage of LLVM code gen
stating that because LLVM code gen can only be accessed single-threaded it
needs to be protected with this global lock.
But now this lock has caused some perf issues as we pretty much lose
2019 Apr 04
2
single-threaded code-gen and how to make it support multi-thread
Thank you Johannes, I looked it up and it seems that we're creating one
LLVMContext per compilation "unit", not sure if that matters. i.e. there's
no single globally shared LLVMContext object.
Is LLVMContext *the* concurrency isolation (or unit) here?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 6:34 PM Doerfert, Johannes <jdoerfert at anl.gov> wrote:
> Do you use one llvm context or one
2012 Feb 22
1
[LLVMdev] Size of structs & arrays
Eli Friedman-2 wrote:
>
>
> Try llvm::Constant::getNullValue().
>
>
I'm trying this:
llvm::Constant* one =
llvm::Constant::getNullValue(llvm::IntegerType::get(mod->getContext(), 64));
llvm::ConstantInt* two = llvm::ConstantInt::get(mod->getContext(),
llvm::APInt(32, llvm::StringRef("1"), 10));
std::vector<llvm::Value*> indices;
2008 Jul 31
1
Samba 3.2.0: Unable make document Help
Dear list,
I compiled Samba 3.2.0 document like this.
cd samba-3.2.0/source
configure
...
...
...
cd ../docs-xml
make all
but some error happen.
---------------------------------
# make all
...
...
xsltproc --output output/manpages-3/eventlogadm.8 xslt/man.xsl tmp/manpages-3/eventlogadm.8.xml
runtime error: file xslt/man.xsl line 41 element if
unregistered variable list-indent
2013 Apr 05
4
[LLVMdev] A strange testing case of SROA
Hi,
Following is excerpted from dynamic-vector-gep.ll.
The resulting "extractelement" seems to always return 0.0f regardless
the value idx1 and idx2 is holding.
Am I missing something here or there is something fishy take place?
Thanks
Shuxin
101 ; CHECK: test6
102 ; CHECK: insertelement <4 x float> zeroinitializer, float
1.000000e+00, i32 %idx1
103 ; CHECK:
2013 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] A strange testing case of SROA
Hi Shuxin
I think i might have written that test. And yeah, no matter what values you get you’ll get a 0.0. Its probably a bad test case, but i can’t remember if it exposed a bug in this form or not. Since writing it Chandler rewrote SROA anyway so the original bug is long gone.
Thanks,
Pete
On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>