similar to: C++ CreateConstGEP questions

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "C++ CreateConstGEP questions"

2011 Feb 01
2
[LLVMdev] Convenience methods in ConstantExpr et al
I notice that there's a lot of inconsistency in the various LLVM classes with respect to convenience methods. Here's some examples: For creating GEPS, IRBuilder has: CreateGEP (2 overloads) CreateInBoundsGEP (2 overloads) CreateConstGEP1_32 CreateConstInBoundsGEP1_32 CreateConstGEP2_32 CreateConstInBoundsGEP2_32 CreateConstGEP1_64 CreateConstInBoundsGEP1_64
2011 Feb 02
0
[LLVMdev] Convenience methods in ConstantExpr et al
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > I notice that there's a lot of inconsistency in the various LLVM classes > with respect to convenience methods. Here's some examples: > > For creating GEPS, IRBuilder has: > > CreateGEP (2 overloads) > CreateInBoundsGEP (2 overloads) > CreateConstGEP1_32 >
2011 Feb 02
2
[LLVMdev] Convenience methods in ConstantExpr et al
Talin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com > <mailto:viridia at gmail.com>> wrote: > > I notice that there's a lot of inconsistency in the various LLVM > classes with respect to convenience methods. Here's some examples: > > For creating GEPS, IRBuilder has: > > CreateGEP (2 overloads) >
2015 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Question about NoWrap flag for SCEVAddRecExpr
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > >> Base is treated as unsigned so 0xff…ff + 1 would be 0x100…00 > > This is the part I was missing, thanks for pointing out the FAQ. So > the infinitely precise address computed by a GEP is > > zext(Base) + sext(Idx0) + sext(Idx1) … ? Yes, that is the way I read it.
2015 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Question about NoWrap flag for SCEVAddRecExpr
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 12:48 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Base is treated as unsigned so
2001 Mar 04
1
bubblebabble patch
Hi, Here is a patch that adds the possibility of displaying key fingerprints in the bubblebabble format used by ssh.com ssh implementations. I hope it makes its way into the source. --- ./openssh-2.5.1/key_original.h Sun Mar 4 00:47:55 2001 +++ ./openssh-2.5.1/key.h Sun Mar 4 00:57:57 2001 @@ -36,6 +36,17 @@ KEY_DSA, KEY_UNSPEC }; + +enum digest_type { + DIGEST_TYPE_SHA1, +
2007 Jul 23
1
Error using Rd2dvi on OSX
Hi, I run R 2.5.1 on Mac OS 10.4.10 and fail to build a package manual. Below is the transcript. The problem is a "pdflatex: command not found" error but I think that I have a fully working latex install (installed with iInstaller) as I use TeXShop with no problem. Could someone help? Jean-Pierre -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] Convenience methods in ConstantExpr et al
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Talin wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com >> <mailto:viridia at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I notice that there's a lot of inconsistency in the various LLVM >> classes with respect to convenience methods. Here's some
2011 Feb 04
3
[LLVMdev] ConstantBuilder proposal
Here's a sketch of what I am proposing for ConstantBuilder. I'd like feedback on naming conventions, doc comments, etc. //===-- llvm/Support/ConstantBuilder.h - Builder for Constants --*- C++ -*-===// // // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure // // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. //
2013 Mar 20
3
highlight overlapping region of two densities
Hi all. I would like to highlight overlapping regions of two densities and I could not find a way to do it. Here is the sample code: myd <- c(2,4,5, 4,3,2,2,3,3,3,2,3,3,4,2,4,3,3,3,2,2.5, 2, 3,3, 2.3, 3, 3, 2, 3) myd1 <- myd-2 plot(range(density(myd)$x, density(myd1)$x), range(density(myd)$y, density(myd1)$y), type = "n") lines(density(myd), col=1, lwd=4)
2005 Feb 10
2
Problem with "R CMD Rd2dvi": Rd.sty not found
Hi, I run into a problem with "R CMD Rd2dvi" command: it gives me "File `Rd.sty' not found" error (See the output message on the bottom). I get the same error when running "RCMD check". My system is: Windows 2000, R version 2.0.1, MiKTeX version 2.4. I do have a Rd.sty file in R_HOME/share/texm directory. I looked through newsgroups for any related discussions
2010 Apr 09
1
Rsge: recursive parallelization
In principle, I'd like to be able to do something like this: sge.parLapply(seq(10), function(x) parLapply(seq(x), function(x) x^2)) In practice, however, I have to resort to acrobatics like this: sge.options(sge.remove.files=FALSE) sge.options(sge.qsub.options='-cwd -V') sge.parLapply(seq(10), function(x) { sge.options(sge.save.global=TRUE)
2010 Oct 27
2
Why is cpu-to-node mapping different between Xen 4.0.2-rc1-pre and Xen 4.1-unstable?
My system is a dual Xeon E5540 (Nehalem) HP Proliant DL380G6. When switching between Xen 4.0.2-rc1-pre and Xen 4.1-unstable I noticed that the NUMA info as shown by the Xen ''u'' debug-key is different. More specifically, the CPU to node mapping is alternating for 4.0.2 and grouped sequentially for 4.1. This difference affects the allocation (wrt node/socket) of pinned VCPUs to the
2015 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Question about NoWrap flag for SCEVAddRecExpr
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 6:17 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure if inbounds can be used to prove <nuw>. If an object > %OBJ is allocated at address -1 then "gep inbounds %OBJ 1" is not > poison, but the underlying computation unsigned-overflows. I think that this should yield poison per langref because the signed
2019 Apr 04
2
single-threaded code-gen and how to make it support multi-thread
Hi llvm-dev, Our code base has a ancient copy of llvm (ver 3.5.1), and it uses the LLVM code gen for some domain-specific language. The previous dev left a global lock around the usage of LLVM code gen stating that because LLVM code gen can only be accessed single-threaded it needs to be protected with this global lock. But now this lock has caused some perf issues as we pretty much lose
2019 Apr 04
2
single-threaded code-gen and how to make it support multi-thread
Thank you Johannes, I looked it up and it seems that we're creating one LLVMContext per compilation "unit", not sure if that matters. i.e. there's no single globally shared LLVMContext object. Is LLVMContext *the* concurrency isolation (or unit) here? On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 6:34 PM Doerfert, Johannes <jdoerfert at anl.gov> wrote: > Do you use one llvm context or one
2012 Feb 22
1
[LLVMdev] Size of structs & arrays
Eli Friedman-2 wrote: > > > Try llvm::Constant::getNullValue(). > > I'm trying this: llvm::Constant* one = llvm::Constant::getNullValue(llvm::IntegerType::get(mod->getContext(), 64)); llvm::ConstantInt* two = llvm::ConstantInt::get(mod->getContext(), llvm::APInt(32, llvm::StringRef("1"), 10)); std::vector<llvm::Value*> indices;
2008 Jul 31
1
Samba 3.2.0: Unable make document Help
Dear list, I compiled Samba 3.2.0 document like this. cd samba-3.2.0/source configure ... ... ... cd ../docs-xml make all but some error happen. --------------------------------- # make all ... ... xsltproc --output output/manpages-3/eventlogadm.8 xslt/man.xsl tmp/manpages-3/eventlogadm.8.xml runtime error: file xslt/man.xsl line 41 element if unregistered variable list-indent
2013 Apr 05
4
[LLVMdev] A strange testing case of SROA
Hi, Following is excerpted from dynamic-vector-gep.ll. The resulting "extractelement" seems to always return 0.0f regardless the value idx1 and idx2 is holding. Am I missing something here or there is something fishy take place? Thanks Shuxin 101 ; CHECK: test6 102 ; CHECK: insertelement <4 x float> zeroinitializer, float 1.000000e+00, i32 %idx1 103 ; CHECK:
2013 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] A strange testing case of SROA
Hi Shuxin I think i might have written that test. And yeah, no matter what values you get you’ll get a 0.0. Its probably a bad test case, but i can’t remember if it exposed a bug in this form or not. Since writing it Chandler rewrote SROA anyway so the original bug is long gone. Thanks, Pete On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > >