similar to: IOWA & Mongrel, performance

It would be an interesting topic. I bet there are quite a few. I just released one that 1/2 runs on Mongrel. http://direxionfunds.com It was released before it was _quite_ ready, but the last of the content is getting inserted today. I am still waffling on how I will leave it running longterm. Right now it uses a slightly modified version of the Mongrel http parser with EventMachine to front

Hello Everyone, I''d like to just officially announce that the new volunteers are in charge and given control of the project. I won''t be doing anything more than helping them get ramped up, but they''ll be in charge of doing all the stuff you folks want and are basically the owners from now on. Everyone in the new volunteer list will probably do a little announce, but

Hello Everyone, Been head down with personal stuff, but I wanted to shoot out this email saying that I''ve collected the list of volunteers and decided that I''d just hand the keys over to them and see how they do. The list of people I have so far is: Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius at gmail.com> "Kirk Haines" <wyhaines at gmail.com> "Wayne E. Seguin"

I''m working on porting a dynamic website done in PHP over to mod_ruby. I have everything set up and working nicely (I can make a .rhtml page, put ruby code between <% %> and it works etc), but when I try to use "Eruby.import" as a sort of analog to PHP''s "require_once()", I run into trouble. 1) eruby is in my cgi-bin 2) here''s a sample of

I''m trying to sent a file to the iphone (which requires byte-range request support) using the rails send_file method. However, this fails, I think because of mongrel. I think so because if I send the iphone a file handled by nginx, it plays it fine. But then when I serve the file with rails the iphone can''t play it. Any ideas? Alex

Hi, my mongrel has crashed with following errors in the logfile: ** Starting Rails with development environment... ** Rails loaded. ** Loading any Rails specific GemPlugins ** Signals ready. TERM => stop. USR2 => restart. INT => stop (no restart). ** Rails signals registered. HUP => reload (without restart). It might not work well. ** Mongrel 1.1.3 available at 0.0.0.0:3000 **

Hello Mongrels, Mongrel 1.1 is out with fullblown JRuby support, some reorganization, and some bugfixes. Also, Mongrel_cluster has been updated to 1.0.4. Go subscribe to the all-new news feed, because we probably won''t announce to the list anymore: http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/rss.xml Thanks Evan, and the Mongrel Team -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

I''m new to Ruby, Rails, and this list. I''ve tried searching for an answer but it all seems to be over my head. I have all the books but again they seem to leave me on my own to figure out the stuff that really matters. Where is the best place to find out the details? Exactly what are these much celebrated "naming conventions"; i.e. where do I find an exhaustive

Hi , I have rails running on my development machine. I have installed mod_ruby and set up the httpd.conf file to add handlers for .rb files. But the speed I get is still slow compared to webrick which is blazingly fast. I have 2 questions 1. How do I determine if mod_ruby is loaded and is being used to run my ruby scripts ? 2. Which of these fcgi /mod_ruby is faster ? Thanks vivek --------------

Hello. I just seen some errors in my mongrel application log: It seems related to the httpd OPTIONS keyword Example: Processing LoginController#login (for .30.5.208 at 2007-12-10 09:00:23) [OPTIONS] and our ruby application does not know what to do with it. and finally send an error Does mongrel (which is the http server) is supposed to deal with these kind of request ? I think these

Nevermind...need to read the whole msg... I didn't notice you were installing WINS on the NT box...hence the reboot. Standard practice for Winxx: 1. Install, reboot 2. Update, reboot, repeat.... I support about 25 pc's-it annoys the hell out of me how MS manages updates. How many Internet Explorer security updates have there been so far this year-22? Each one of them requires a

Folks- James Cox, Alexy Kovyrin and I all huddled up and got nginx working perfectly with mongrel cluster and rails page caching. So all static and cached files are served fast by nginx and anything not static gets sent to mongrel. http://brainspl.at/articles/2006/09/12/new-nginx-conf-with-rails-caching Cheers- -Ezra

Hello, I''m running a Rails application which must sort and manipulate a lot of data which are loaded in memory. The Rails app runs on 2 mongrel processes. When I first load the app, both are 32Mb in memory. After some days, both are between 200Mb and 300Mb. My question is : is there some kind of garbage collector in Mongrel? I never see the two Mongrel processes memory footprint

Hi, I wrote Apache::RailsDispatcher to run Rails applications on mod_ruby. http://blog.shugo.net/articles/2005/08/03/running-rails-on-mod_ruby Apache::RailsDispatcher can run multiple applications in the same process. It works like this: * require loads libraries into the top level, and they are shared with all applications. * require_dependency loads libraries into an anonymous

Hello there list- I have a question I hope someone can answer. I have a Debian server that currently has mod_ruby and eruby installed and working great for the last year or so. I also have one rails app working great on this box. My question is this: I want to switch to fastcgi so i can have more than one rails app, but there are already many scripts using eruby with no framework at all just

On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Richard wrote: > > I don't think that wireshark adds much to this. Unless you had a > proxy in the middle, the "connection refused" responses already > indicated that your connections were getting to the/a server, it's > just refusing the connections. > > Connections by name, especially short forms, are suspect unless you > can be

So here''s a random question: if a (Ruby) multi-threaded rails server could exist (bug free), would it be faster than using a mongrel cluster? (I.e. 10 mongrel processes versus 10 Ruby threads). I''m not sure if it would. RAM it might save, though. Any thoughts? -Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 14:16:03 +0100 > From: Dr J Austin <ja at maui.jaa.org.uk> > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Richard wrote: > >> >> I don't think that wireshark adds much to this. Unless you had a >> proxy in the middle, the "connection refused" responses already >> indicated that

Okay, I got off my duff this week and have been finishing Mongrel support for IOWA. I now have two handlers that I need to test. One is similar to the Rails handler, passing request handling to IOWA threads in the same process, and the other allows one or more Mongrel processes to pass requests to one or more separate IOWA processes, with session affinity. Is there any set of standard sorts of

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.10. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.10 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES