similar to: Writing a test for gcov style coverage crashing after dlclose

From: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@citrix.com> Split coverage informations extracted from xencov utility. This script accept coverage blob either as file or from input and extract into files compatible with gcc format (gcda). Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@citrix.com> --- tools/misc/Makefile | 2 +- tools/misc/xencov_split | 191

All, Here are the latest patches to expreiment with gcov profiler for xen hypervisor. I have tested current patches on Intel i686. System Details: gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) gcov (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) 4.3.3 Kernel 2.6.28-11-generic Distribution: Ubuntu jaunty 9.04 There are some design issue which i would like to highlight here: 1. To create gcov proc dir user /proc/xen, we are

All, Here are the latest patches to expreiment with gcov profiler for xen hypervisor. I have tested current patches on Intel i686. System Details: gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) gcov (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) 4.3.3 Kernel 2.6.28-11-generic Distribution: Ubuntu jaunty 9.04 There are some design issue which i would like to highlight here: 1. To create gcov proc dir user /proc/xen, we are

rkotler at mipsswbrd006-le:~/caviumllvm/build/test$ make Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making LLVM unittest 'lit.site.cfg' file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -s 8192 ; \ /usr/bin/python /home/rkotler/workspace/llvm/utils/lit/lit.py -s -v . ) XPASS: LLVM :: tools/llvm-cov/llvm-cov.test (8916 of 9784) ******************** TEST

Hi all, I was trying to generate lcov test coverage reports for xapian-core but got an out of memory error: $ lcov --capture --directory . --output-file xapian-core.info Capturing coverage data from . Found gcov version: 4.7.3 Scanning . for .gcda files ... Found 270 data files in . Processing bin/xapian-progsrv.gcda Out of memory! These are the steps I followed in xapian-core directory

Hi All, We trying to use clang+llvm to generate the gcc coverage format as clang version 3.6.0 $clang --coverage -Xclang -coverage-cfg-checksum -Xclang -coverage-no-function-names-in-data -Xclang -coverage-version='407*' test.c $a.out $llvm-cov gcov test.gcda Unexpected version: *704. Invalid .gcno File! Debugging the above cause ,But any hints from experts here ,will help a lot

Hi Justin , Thank you for the confirmation and we would like to know that ,going forward the clang has the support the gcc gcov format or use the -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping and get ride of gcov format . We are planing to customize the clang code coverage for embedded world ,before we start tweaking the gcov / -fprofile-instr-generate code-base ,we would like to take feedback

Umesh Kalappa <umesh.kalappa0 at gmail.com> writes: > Hi Justin , > > Thank you for the confirmation and we would like to know that ,going > forward the clang has the support the gcc gcov format or use the > -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping and get ride of gcov > format . Going forward, the -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping (which I'll refer to as

Updated set of patches for coverage. Changes: - change copyright lines - use gcov: instead of cover: in commit comment - use #ifdef in xen/common/sysctl.c instead of dummy inline function - added base documentation in docs/misc - added -h option to xencov

Hi All, I want to provide a solution that presents code coverage reports that include the aggregated code-counts across many binaries. Our test engineers currently do this using gcov-mode by merged .gcda data files. We can do a similar merge of the .profraw files, so that the many binaries are represented in one .profdata file; However, llvm-cov will only generate reports based on one binary at

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Qun Fa <testforqunfa at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I think Nick's suggestion is correct, my code was linked against > libprofile_rt.a, which had gcda profiling code before, but was removed > https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/commit/218042a02305a3cc38d968a97ff9ecf4b4abe6ff > > So, I couldn't find the correct symbols from

Hi All, I think Nick's suggestion is correct, my code was linked against libprofile_rt.a, which had gcda profiling code before, but was removed https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/commit/218042a02305a3cc38d968a97ff9ecf4b4abe6ff So, I couldn't find the correct symbols from libprofile_rt.a any more. Now my assumption is I need to use the correct library that is provided by compiler-rt.

Hi! On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Qun Fa <testforqunfa at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Alexey. > > I have tried to use Makefile. This will generate the correct symbols that > I need. > > Any idea on the schedule of adding CMake support to compiler-rt? > Starting from r177382 CMake on Linux should build the same profile compiler-rt library as Makefiles. >

Thank you Alexey. I have tried to use Makefile. This will generate the correct symbols that I need. Any idea on the schedule of adding CMake support to compiler-rt? Sincerely, Qun On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Qun Fa <testforqunfa at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >>

Thank you Alexey. I will try this out this week. Any idea on supporting this for Mac? My raw idea is to add this to compiler-rt/lib/profile/CMakeLists.txt if(APPLE) foreach(arch ${PROFILE_SUPPORTED_ARCH}) add_compiler_rt_static_runtime(clang_rt.profile-${arch} ${arch} SOURCES ${PROFILE_SOURCES} CFLAGS --sysroot=${COMPILER_RT_DARWIN_SDK_SYSROOT}) endforeach() endif() Do you

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Qun Fa <testforqunfa at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Alexey. I will try this out this week. Any idea on supporting > this for Mac? > > My raw idea is to add this to compiler-rt/lib/profile/CMakeLists.txt > > if(APPLE) > foreach(arch ${PROFILE_SUPPORTED_ARCH}) > add_compiler_rt_static_runtime(clang_rt.profile-${arch} ${arch}

Thanks for your reply. May I know which is the recommended library that should be linked against? I am currently linking libprofile_rt.a. And I have noticed the differences that, if we do `nm libprofile_rt.a | grep llvm` with my old copy of the llvm/clang installation, I can see 00000000000005e0 T _llvm_gcda_emit_arcs 0000000000000b48 S _llvm_gcda_emit_arcs.eh 0000000000000430 T

Hi, I'd like to add a new pass to LLVM which removes redundant profile counter updates. The goal is to speed up code coverage testing and profile generation for PGO. I'm sending this email out to describe my approach, share some early results, and gather feedback. Problem Overview ================ A profile counter is redundant if it's incremented in exactly the same basic blocks

BTW, this will also remove the entire 'runtime' directory in the LLVM repository. Runtime libraries are now being developed in compiler-rt. That is where the GCDA profiling runtime already lives and any new instrumentation based profiling runtime would also likely live there. If the code in the existing runtime tree is needed to start building those, they can always be found in the VCS

On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 12:50:46PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am > index 7ead75c..915efe4 100644 > --- a/src/Makefile.am > +++ b/src/Makefile.am > @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ nbdkit_CPPFLAGS = \ > nbdkit_CFLAGS = \ > -pthread \ > $(WARNINGS_CFLAGS) \ > - $(GNUTLS_CFLAGS) > + $(GNUTLS_CFLAGS) \ > + $(VALGRIND_CFLAGS)