similar to: Instrumented BB in PGO

Hi, I have a question regarding PGO. I collected profile data with the instrumentation build (-fprofile-instr-generate) and provided for PGO optimization in the second build (with -fprofile-instr-use=xxx.profdata). This works fine. Then I tried to provide the profile data to opt using the option -pgo-instr-use, but this causes an error with the message: "Not an IR level instrumentation

Hello, I'm learning how LLVM performs PGO (profile-guided optimizations) by using the instrumentation-based profile build (-fprofile-instr-generate and -fprofile-instr-use). However, I found there is no difference in inlining behaviors between with and without PGO for a few spec benchmarks by checking the emit optimization reports (-Rpass=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -Rpass-analysis=inline).

Hi All, How could I use BranchInst to implement for example br label %if.else7 br label %if.then5 br i1 %cmp4, label %if.then5, label %if.else7 I can use BranchInst for only one instruction but how could I compare between two branches Thanks -- * Rasha Salah Omar Msc Student at E-JUST Demonestrator at Faculty of Computers and Informatics Benha University* *

Your question isn't clear; please restate what specifically isn't working. -Eli On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Rasha Omar <rasha.sala7 at gmail.com> wrote: > or like this > > %cmp4 = icmp eq i32 %rem, 0 > > br i1 %cmp4, label %if.then5, label %if.else7 > > > On 14 August 2013 20:08, Rasha Omar <rasha.sala7 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi

or like this %cmp4 = icmp eq i32 %rem, 0 br i1 %cmp4, label %if.then5, label %if.else7 On 14 August 2013 20:08, Rasha Omar <rasha.sala7 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > How could I use BranchInst to implement for example > br label %if.else7 > br label %if.then5 > br i1 %cmp4, label %if.then5, label %if.else7 > > I can use BranchInst for only one

How could BranchInst be used to insert new branch between two basic blocks to get result like this example: br label %if.else br label %if.then br i1 %cmp1, label %if.then, label %if.else Thanks for your help On 14 August 2013 21:36, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > Your question isn't clear; please restate what specifically isn't working. > > -Eli

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > As for why it should be an IR pass, mostly because once the selection dag >> runs through the code, we can never recover all of the freedom we have at >> the IR level. To start with, splicing MBBs around requires known about

Greetings, I have a Zig implementation of ceil which is emitted into LLVM IR like this: ; Function Attrs: nobuiltin nounwind define internal fastcc float @ceil(float) unnamed_addr #3 !dbg !644 { Entry: %x = alloca float, align 4 store float %0, float* %x call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata float* %x, metadata !649, metadata !494), !dbg !651 %1 = load float, float* %x, !dbg !652 %2 =

Author: tomee Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 367993089b181886f94c88ffa5759d0626e95ad7 Log message: PSARC 2006/054 DTrace JNI Binding 6384263 PSARC 2006/054 DTrace JNI Binding Files: create: usr/src/lib/libdtrace_jni/Makefile create: usr/src/lib/libdtrace_jni/Makefile.com create: usr/src/lib/libdtrace_jni/amd64/Makefile create: usr/src/lib/libdtrace_jni/common/dtj_attr.c create:

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-06-19 8:45 GMT-07:00 Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > >> Greetings, >> >> I have a Zig implementation of ceil which is emitted into LLVM IR like >> this: >> >> ; Function Attrs: nobuiltin nounwind >> define

Hello, I'm new to R and am having trouble plotting intraday data on a chart. I haven't had any success with using ideas from some other posts or other content. My data is in csv format, here's the first few rows: TimeStamp..UTC. Open High Low Close 1 2011-06-15 13:30:00:0000 127175 127500 126925 127425 2 2011-06-15 14:00:00:0000 127400 127575 127225 127225 3 2011-06-15

I've been looking at GlobalAddress lowering strategy recently and was wondering if anyone had any ideas, insights, or experience to share. ## Background When lowering global address, which is typically done in FooTargetLowering::LowerGlobalAddress you have the option of folding in the global offset into the global address or else emitting the base globaladdress and a separate ADD node for the

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > >> >> On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> >> As for why it should be an IR pass, mostly because once the selection >>> dag runs through the code, we can never

Hi, I'm using rsync 2.6.8 to backup files and encountered the following problem: rsync -zvvxa --partial --no-whole-file --stats --progress ../new/access_log.processed . building file list ... 1 file to consider delta-transmission enabled access_log.processed rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 16385 bytes [sender]: Broken pipe (32) inflate (token) returned -5 rsync error: error in

Hi All, The PRE or GVNPRE is not effective for the below use case. int sum; int phi =30; void f (int i, int *a) { if ((a[i] << (1)) > -15) sum =(phi+ 0x7fffffffL )/ a[i]; if ((a[i] << (2)) > -15) sum =(phi + 0x7fffffffL) /a[i]; } respective asm (clang on trunk ) #clang -O3 -S test.c BB#0: # %entry pushl %edi pushl %esi

Hi, With the MSP430 target I have live-in/live-out problems pointed out by Machine Instruction Verifier with the attached test-case compiled with: clang-cc -triple=msp430-unknown-unknown test-live.c -S -o - -O1 -verify-machineinstrs -debug For example: %R15W is killed in MBB#0: CMP16rr %R14W<kill>, %R15W<kill>, %SRW<imp-def> But %R15 as live-in in MMB#1: if.else: 0xa244c20,

Dear all, First of all, Merry Christmas! :) While testing a File I/O sample program, I've encountered a link failure due to missing implementation of "\01__isoc99_fscanf" function. I think this function should be named "__isoc99_fscanf" instead. Please see the program code and LLVM IR generated by DragonEgg and clang below. It shows that clang generates

IM 2013 The 13th IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management Ghent, Belgium, 27-31 May 2013 http://www.im2013.org/ (Paper Submission Date: 16 August 2012) "Smart Management in a Virtualized World" The 13th IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM 2013) will be held 27-31 May 2013 in the beautiful city center of Ghent, Belgium and

IM 2013 The 13th IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management Ghent, Belgium, 27-31 May 2013 http://www.im2013.org/ (Paper Submission Date: 16 August 2012) "Smart Management in a Virtualized World" The 13th IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM 2013) will be held 27-31 May 2013 in the beautiful city center of Ghent, Belgium and

using `opt --print-after-all -O3` I see that EarlyCSE is interpreting the call to `ceil` and constant fold: *** IR Dump After Early CSE *** ; Function Attrs: nobuiltin nounwind define i1 @do_test() #2 { Entry: %0 = call fastcc float @ceil(float 0.000000e+00) #6 %1 = call fastcc float @ceil32(float 0.000000e+00) #6 %2 = fcmp fast oeq float 0.000000e+00, %1 ret i1 %2 } So just running `opt