similar to: Status of the official LLVM APT repositories

On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 and > 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it might need > more work for old Ubuntu (back port of cmake) Hi Sylvestre, Thank you for the clarification! Any ETAs on when the APT repositories are going to be updated with LLVM 3.8 & 3.9 builds?

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Le 09/03/2016 à 21:44, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > >> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 > >> and 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it >

Hi Sylvestre, On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9 > packages are going to be green by next week. Any updates on that? It appears that Precise repositories are now in order, but all the others (and, most importantly, Trusty) are still not updated. Also, 3.9 packages are not mentioned on the web page,

Le 12/03/2016 à 14:15, Johan Engelen a écrit : > > > > I'm not sure how clean / dirty of a solution you'd be okay with, but > > I'd just point out that CMake developers provide working binary > > tarballs for Linux with every release at > https://cmake.org/download/ . > > So, if you are not a purist and/or need the CMake backport for

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 08:10 Amaury SECHET via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'd like to shime in here. These apt repository used to contain packages > named llvm-3.8-tools containing, amongst other things, the lit python > library used to test llvm. It seems that it went away recently and I have > travis build failing because of this. > > What is

Le 29/03/2016 à 14:17, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > Hi Sylvestre, > ri > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9 packages are going to be green by next week. > > Any updates on that? Yes, most of the remaining issues are fixed (the sync to llvm.org/apt was disabled). I will send a summary soon.

llvm-3.8-dev is broken: CMake Error at /usr/share/llvm-3.8/cmake/LLVMConfig.cmake:178 (include): include could not find load file: /usr/share/llvm/cmake/LLVMExports.cmake llvm-3.7-dev is ok. Why is it so error prone for so many years? On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 11:31 PM Amaury SECHET via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > So, it turns out that the secret sauce to

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 09:38 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd be happy to do it, but this is a bit much high level for me to be > actionable. Can you explain me what I should do to reintroduce them int he > debian packaging ? > On the CMake side, I'm not sure. I think it's just a matter of using the "install()" functions to install them

Hi there! I'm a n00b NUT user trying to get it running on RHEL5 and actually do something useful for me. Few questions: 1) I want it to notify me by email on power loss and power back events. I can't find any sample scripts for this purpose... Where shall I look for them? 2) So far, I've backported the package from Fedora and got my Ablerex running (previously used with Upsilon /

Hi guys! I'm trying to get NUT into RPMForge and confusingly enough, it turns out that the code downloads are not available from the official website: http://new.networkupstools.org/download.html [buildbot at servinet SOURCES]$ wget http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/nut-2.4.1.tar.gz --2009-12-25 13:26:23-- http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/nut-2.4.1.tar.gz Resolving

Network UPS Tools version 2.4.3 has been released. http://www.networkupstools.org/ Note: this is only a bugfix release that only solves the regression on IPv6 activation. Direct access: - Download: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/nut-2.4.3.tar.gz - News: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/new-2.4.3.txt - ChangeLog: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/ChangeLog the NUT

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:46 PM Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote: > Le 09/05/2016 à 07:34, Paweł Bylica a écrit : > > llvm-3.8-dev is broken: > > > > CMake Error at /usr/share/llvm-3.8/cmake/LLVMConfig.cmake:178 (include): > > include could not find load file: > > > > /usr/share/llvm/cmake/LLVMExports.cmake > Brad King helped me

Le 09/05/2016 à 16:59, Paweł Bylica a écrit : > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:46 PM Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org > <mailto:sylvestre at debian.org>> wrote: > > Le 09/05/2016 à 07:34, Paweł Bylica a écrit : > > llvm-3.8-dev is broken: > > > > CMake Error at /usr/share/llvm-3.8/cmake/LLVMConfig.cmake:178 > (include): >

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285 Yury V. Zaytsev <yury at shurup.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yury at shurup.com --- Comment #7 from Yury V. Zaytsev <yury at shurup.com> --- I'd really like this

On Sun, 1 May 2016 at 16:12 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: > Some update on this. > > 2016-04-12 18:48 GMT-07:00 Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com>: > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 09:38 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'd be happy to do it, but this is a bit much high level for me to be >>>

Le 23/06/2016 à 19:13, Renato Golin a écrit : > On 23 June 2016 at 17:56, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-foundation > <llvm-foundation at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Thanks to the LLVM Foundation and Tanya, the apt repository is now back: >> >> http://apt.llvm.org/ > Nice! Thanks everyone! > > Are we filtering multiple hits, or are we just assuming people will be

Hello, Thanks to the LLVM Foundation and Tanya, the apt repository is now back: http://apt.llvm.org/ It will take a few days before all the builds go green [1]. Please update your configurations. Sylvestre [1] The same build infra is still used but the builds were failing because using llvm.org/apt too.

On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote: > I did some cleanup of the repositories today (Sunday). > I remove all the 3.3 snapshots which were wrong (they were older than the > official 3.3 release and not maintained). > I didn't think that anybody was using them (Looks like I was wrong, sorry!). No problem, we were just using them

Sylvestre (CC'd) might know where to find it on Debian/Ubuntu repositories. cheers, --renato On 6 October 2013 18:45, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote: > Konstantin, This is a legitimate question because the packages are > maintained by the LLVM project and kept on llvm.org. > > David, while I don't see 3.3 packages I do see 3.4 snapshots in the > repository.

Hello, I did some cleanup of the repositories today (Sunday). I remove all the 3.3 snapshots which were wrong (they were older than the official 3.3 release and not maintained). I didn't think that anybody was using them (Looks like I was wrong, sorry!). You are not happy about the 3.4 packages ? Sylvestre On 06/10/2013 19:52, Renato Golin wrote: > Sylvestre (CC'd) might know where