similar to: Formalize "revert for more design review" policy.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Formalize "revert for more design review" policy."

2016 Mar 09
4
Formalize "revert for more design review" policy.
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sean Silva" <chisophugis at gmail.com> > To: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Cc: "Chris Lattner" <clattner at apple.com>, "Rafael Ávila de Espíndola" <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>, "Michael Spencer" > <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>, "Chandler Carruth"
2017 May 11
2
Add more projects into Git monorepo
> On May 9, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > 2017-05-09 9:03 GMT-07:00 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk <mailto:David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>>: > On 9 May 2017, at 16:59, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com <mailto:joker.eph at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > I'm not
2012 Apr 17
7
[LLVMdev] 3.1 Has Branched
Hi all, We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!) If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please contact the code owners (http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#owners) so that they can approve the patches. No patches will be accepted into the 3.1 release without prior approval! This should be a great release! :-) -bw
2016 May 05
2
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
On 05/05/2016 11:42 AM, C Bergström via llvm-dev wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:55 AM C Bergström <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> Chandler - I do not want to derail, hijack or change the topic of this >>> discussion - Would you be ok with me going into specific
2002 Feb 22
2
Problems running HL with todays wine snapshot
Hi, I tried to get HL running with Wine, but some problems occured: With fresh HL-Installation it keeps asking me for the HL-CD even if I mounted it correctly. Drive setup of wine is correct (isn't complaining about a missing drive) I read that installing 1.1.0.8 helps, so I did, but with this patch HL is not even starting, errormsg is There may be more fonts available - try increasing the
2020 Jul 22
2
[RFC] Preferred error/note style across non-clang tools, e.g. tablegen
Hi, Jonathan. > On Jul 21, 2020, at 17:15, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan_roelofs at apple.com> wrote: > > > >> On Jul 21, 2020, at 1:46 PM, Evandro Menezes <evandro.menezes at sifive.com <mailto:evandro.menezes at sifive.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jul 21, 2020, at 14:30, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
2016 Nov 08
2
Status of SMTPUTF8?
I was wondering whether there is a roadmap for adding SMTPUTF8 support to Dovecot? My delivery pattern is Postfix -> Dovecot LMTP and it is choking on utf8 messages. I might be able to volunteer some of my time as a developer. Another thread about this seemed to go unanswered: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-September/105474.html
2020 Sep 03
8
SID mapping: Samba and SSSD
On 03/09/2020 22:08, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:05:46PM -0400, Andrew Walker via samba wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Rowland penny via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> On 03/09/2020 21:38, Robert Marcano wrote: >>>> On 9/3/20 4:35 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On
2019 Nov 18
2
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:49 AM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > | mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult, and often intimidating for newcomers > > > > Um… what? While I know (via my own children) that folks nowadays use multiple avenues of communication, it’s *really* hard to imagine email as a *mechanism*
2019 Nov 18
6
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:55 AM David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 18/11/2019 16:39, Stefan Teleman via llvm-dev wrote: > > I can't recall an instance when I had difficulty using, or was > > intimidated by, email, for saying something on a mailing list. > > Subscribing to a mailing list, particularly one as high-traffic as >
2012 Apr 17
0
[LLVMdev] 3.1 Has Branched
how to get this branch? still svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm? Thank you. On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!) > > If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please > contact the code owners
2018 Sep 14
1
Status of SMTPUTF8?
On 06.09.2018 22:25, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > I necro-bump this thread as I have the same problem since I switched to LMTP from LDA (as the wiki recommend). > Any news to make dovecot LMTP postix compliant ? > > > Le 08/11/2016 ? 17:13, Noah Tilton a ?crit?: >> >> I was wondering whether there is a roadmap for adding SMTPUTF8 support to Dovecot? >> >>
2017 Mar 08
2
From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files
On 8 March 2017 at 11:15, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: > On 03/08/2017 01:57 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: >> >> >>> The recommended configuration for EL7 is to use NetworkManager unless >>> you have a very specific edge case preventing you from doing so: >>> >> The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their
2019 Feb 20
2
Clarification on expectations of buildbot email notifications
I think we could/should be a little bit more precise here: > ... any regressions whether they affect buildbots or not, the > patch author should be responsible for fixing the issue. especially if we say that the bar for a revert is low. That is, the "any regression" needs a bit more clarifications. Assuming we are talking about performance regressions (not language conformance or
2019 Jan 11
1
Authentication against Apple Open Directory (was: Re: LDAP authentication without Samba schema)
I am absolutely loathe to necro a thread like this so far in the future but that's kind of the point here... It's 2019 and as much as I've tried (everything in this thread and more... like trying some weird trickery with pam_exec), I can't figure this out. I have clients with huge and elaborate OD environments that I absolutely would never have access to the terminal/desktop of,
2017 Jan 02
2
AD Replication issues due to lingering objects
We are trying to migrate away from out Windows 2008 R2 server to a Samba based DC. At this point we have both the Windows server as a Samba server as DC in the domain. After a while, we noticed that changes from the Samba server were not replicated to the Windows machine. Further investigation show that there are 2 lingering objects that prevent replication, and it has been for quite a while. The
2006 Sep 13
4
Lingering dhclient issue
I recently reconfigured some CentOS 4.3 systems that were using DHCP to use static IP addresses. At the same time, the systems were moved to a new VLAN. Here is the approximate sequence of events that took place: 1. ifdown eth0 2. edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 with static IP address 3. wait for network folks to reconfigure switch 4. ifup eth0 I may have
2020 Sep 03
4
SID mapping: Samba and SSSD
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 03/09/2020 21:38, Robert Marcano wrote: > > On 9/3/20 4:35 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> On 03/09/2020 21:15, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: > >>> > >>> There is an sssd provided idmapper (on RHEL/CentOS/Fedora) it is > >>> packaged
2020 Jan 31
3
Sending bot emails to both Git authors and committers
When committing changes on behalf of other contributors, I've started setting the author in Git to be the change author. I think that's better for attribution than just including "Patch By: username" in the message which is default for arc, especially now that we're finally using Git. However, I've noticed that when the change breaks bots, emails are sent only to the
2011 Jul 22
20
[LLVMdev] git
On Jul 22, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> Of course, if you've used SVN extensively, you've been trained to think >> that history has to be somewhat linear, and perhaps even that the trunk >> branch is the only one needing QA attention. Migration from SVN to Git >> is hard because you have to change the mental model, not just command >> names and