similar to: [LLVMDev] llvm-cov outputting coverage results as HTML reports

Xinliang David Li via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Harlan Haskins has recently submitted a patch (for review) that implements > --format=html for llvm-cov tool. Please take a look at that patch. For reference, the review thread starts here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160229/336622.html > David > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at

Hi all, Recently I’ve noticed in coverage profiles that llvm_unreachable and the like are considered uncovered because there’s no special behavior in instrumentation to ‘ignore’ noreturn paths. While I don’t necessarily think it’s ideal to ignore all noreturn decls, I think there’s definitely room for some heuristics around ignoring things like llvm_unreachable (perhaps opt-in?). I’m

+ cfe-dev > On Mar 28, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Harlan Haskins via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Recently I’ve noticed in coverage profiles that llvm_unreachable and the like are considered uncovered because there’s no special behavior in instrumentation to ‘ignore’ noreturn paths. FWIW, Daniel Dunbar and a few others have brought up the lack of a

Hi All, I want to provide a solution that presents code coverage reports that include the aggregated code-counts across many binaries. Our test engineers currently do this using gcov-mode by merged .gcda data files. We can do a similar merge of the .profraw files, so that the many binaries are represented in one .profdata file; However, llvm-cov will only generate reports based on one binary at

Hi all, I was trying to generate lcov test coverage reports for xapian-core but got an out of memory error: $ lcov --capture --directory . --output-file xapian-core.info Capturing coverage data from . Found gcov version: 4.7.3 Scanning . for .gcda files ... Found 270 data files in . Processing bin/xapian-progsrv.gcda Out of memory! These are the steps I followed in xapian-core directory

Hi , I could see the LLVM code coverage info at the below links http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/ I am interested in the branch coverage metric. I could not find the branch coverage related info . Can anyone let me know how to find it. If it is not available , I am happy to work on it, if I can get some details on why

Hi, Alan Thanks for making it clear. But I was more confused now :( I tested on a simple program and used both gcov and lcov to get branch coverage. The code and build commands as below: *Example simple.cc* #include <string> // If not comment this line, the branch coverage won't reach to 100% // #include <iostream> int main(int argc, const char* argv[]) { std::string str =

Hi, Alan Really very excited to receive your email and sorry to be slow replying, it has been exceptionally busy over the last few days ;( Your explanation made the problem clear to me. So gcov branch coverage should be called condition coverage and clang region coverage is branch coverage in fact(also known as *decision/C1*), right? And llvm/clang will support all the following coverage

Hi David, In my use case, our test teams want a single html index file that links to an aggregated coverage report that covers an entire code repository. I see that there is a new patch of generating html reports, is there a way to index all of the individual source files into one summary report, where there are many binary files to consider? *> I don't see why a wrapper script (that

Hi, llvm/clang experts I need to get the branch coverage for some testing code. But i found gcov can't give a expected coverage which may count some 'hidden branch' in (See stackoverflow answer <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42003783/lcov-gcov-branch-coverage-with-c-producing-branches-all-over-the-place>). Instead, I turn to use clang and the 'source-based code

Hello, I have few questions about coverage. Is there any user-facing documentation for clang's "-coverage" flag? The coverage instrumentation seems to happen before asan, and so if asan is also enabled asan will instrument accesses to @__llvm_gcov_ctr. This is undesirable and so we'd like to skip these accesses. Looks like GEP around @__llvm_gcov_ctr have special metadata

I unfortunately haven't received any responses about this problem. We (the company I work for) are willing to discuss payment to someone who is willing to quickly contribute a fix to the RGoogleDocs/RCurl toolchain that will restore write access. Please contact me directly if you're interested. Thank you, -Harlan Harris On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Harlan Harris

All, Here are the latest patches to expreiment with gcov profiler for xen hypervisor. I have tested current patches on Intel i686. System Details: gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) gcov (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) 4.3.3 Kernel 2.6.28-11-generic Distribution: Ubuntu jaunty 9.04 There are some design issue which i would like to highlight here: 1. To create gcov proc dir user /proc/xen, we are

All, Here are the latest patches to expreiment with gcov profiler for xen hypervisor. I have tested current patches on Intel i686. System Details: gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) gcov (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) 4.3.3 Kernel 2.6.28-11-generic Distribution: Ubuntu jaunty 9.04 There are some design issue which i would like to highlight here: 1. To create gcov proc dir user /proc/xen, we are

Another question is about the performance of coverage's at-exit actions (dumping coverage data on disk). I've built chromium's base_unittests with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage and the coverage's at-exit hook takes 22 seconds, which is 44x more than I am willing to pay. Most of the time is spent here: #0 0x00007ffff3b034cd in msync () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82 #1

Hi, I'm running wine-1.0.1, OpenBUGS 3.0.3, R 2.9.0, and R2WinBUGS on a Redhat Enterprise Linux machine. Following various peoples' suggestions... This works perfectly (yay!): wine Z:/opt/OpenBUGS/winbugs.exe Within R, however, I get this: (setup the example from ?bugs, then....) R> schools.sim <- bugs(data, inits, parameters, model.file, n.chains=3,

I've been working on adding code coverage support to my ELLCC project (http://ellcc.org) and I thought it would be nice to fun the index page of the HTML output of llvm-cov into something a little prettier and more useful. The initial result is here: http://ellcc.org/coverage/ If there is any interest, I'll submit the llvm-cov changes. -Rich

Le 06/05/2015 21:05, Renato Golin a écrit : > On 6 May 2015 at 19:15, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> I could not easily locate this on http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/ so >> asking here: what workload is the coverage computed over? IOW, what >> all does the bot run to get this coverage information? > Nothing is clear in that page. No

I’m working to implement Source Based Code Coverage in a workflow that uses lcov for report generation. We’ve customized our llvm-cov to add a command to convert the SBCC counter data to lcov’s ‘.info’ format. The problem is that the region-based counter definitions in SBCC can span source code regions that can contain blank lines (or lines with only comments). Converting this to lcov’s

Hello, Some code using RGoogleDocs, which had been working smoothly since the summer, just stopped working. I know that it worked on November 3rd, but it doesn't work today. I've confirmed that the login and password still work when I log in manually. I've confirmed that the URL gives the same error when I paste it into Firefox. I don't know enough about this web service to figure