similar to: which ir instructions have name

Hi all, I am trying to compile my toy language to LLVM back end. (I am new to LLVM, so my questions may sound naive) I am looking at some tutorials about LLVM, most are about how to use LLVM IRBuilder, however, I find the API provided by IRBuilder is quite imperative and verbose, and the API changes so fast that most of the tutorials are out of dated. So I am wondering what's

Hi George, > This is the seg fault I am getting. > > dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: > __ZN4llvm13IRBuilderBase18CreateGlobalStringEPKcRKNS_5TwineE > Referenced from: > /Users/georgebaah/llvm_dir/llvm-2.8/Debug+Asserts/lib/LLVMArrayBoundsCheck.dylib > Expected in: flat namespace > > dyld: Symbol not found:

This is the seg fault I am getting. dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __ZN4llvm13IRBuilderBase18CreateGlobalStringEPKcRKNS_5TwineE Referenced from: /Users/georgebaah/llvm_dir/llvm-2.8/Debug+Asserts/lib/LLVMArrayBoundsCheck.dylib Expected in: flat namespace dyld: Symbol not found: __ZN4llvm13IRBuilderBase18CreateGlobalStringEPKcRKNS_5TwineE Referenced from:

I want to create an add instruction that takes two constant operands at the LLVM IR level. I use the IRBuilder class, but nothing happens. Here is part of the runOnFunction() method of my function pass: ... LLVMContext &Context = F.getContext(); IRBuilder<> builder(&Instruction); Value *Lef = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(Context), 4); Value *Rig =

Thanks for the updates! Minor comments: + if (!Accuracy) + // If it's not a floating point number then it must be 'fast'. + return HUGE_VALF; Can we add an assert instead of a comment? It's just as documenting and will catch any goofs. + // If it's not a floating point number then it must be 'fast'. + return !isa<ConstantFP>(MD->getOperand(0));

If I have a data frame where a species occupies several rows with different phases such as (both col's ar factors): species,phase Populus tremula,1 Populus tremula,2 Populus tremula,3 Calluna vulgaris,1 Calluna vulgaris,2 Betula alba,1 Betula alba,2 Betula alba,3 Primula veris,1 Primula veris,2 and another df where each species only have one row: species,growth_form Populus tremula,tree Acer

Dear all, I have a data frame with different variables and I want to build different subsets out of this data frame using some conditions and I want to use a loop because there will be a lot of subsets and this would be saving a lot of time. I try to give you an overview about my data frame. I have a data frame named "Baumdaten" and it has one column named "transectID" with

On Oct 13, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Alexandra, > >> I upgraded to llvm 2.8 and when I generate *.ll files from C/C++ with >> clang -S -emit-llvm I obtain a *.ll file in which instructions and >> basicblocks have no names. >> I tried as well compiling with the -g option, but no names were given. > > with dragonegg using -fverbose-asm causes

So one way might look like this: IRBuilder<> Builder(&*BB); // BB = Function::iterator OR IRBuilder<> Builder(CallInst->getParent()); Builder.SetInsertPoint(CallInst); InstructionClass *YourNewInstruction = builder.CreateInstructionClass(.....); // InstructionClass = type of instruction you are inserting -Ryan On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at

Hi, I was trying to create a new *Store* instruction and inserting it to LLVM IR (.ll) file. I found the following constructor in LLVM Manual: StoreInst::StoreInst <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1StoreInst.html#aa2a72f9a51b317f5b4ab8695adf59025> (Value <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1Value.html> * Val, Value

Hi everyone, Instruction and Value classes have "Uses" and "User". What is the difference between them? I think that "Uses" gives all the instructions/values that a particular Value depends on and "User" gives all the instructions/values that depend on that particular value. Is that right? Best, Carlo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hello. I come back to this thread. But I want to ask a slightly different question. Is there a way to have LLVM IR language intrinsics that are given at construction time a string that is written at assembly generation time as it is? (so, basically having placeholders of strings in LLVM that remain untouched until the end, including code generation time.) More exactly, I would

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Hongbo Zhang <bobzhang1988 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > I am trying to compile my toy language to LLVM back end. (I am new to > LLVM, so my questions may sound naive) > I am looking at some tutorials about LLVM, most are about how to use LLVM > IRBuilder, however, I find the API provided by IRBuilder is quite imperative > and

Hi Everyone, I'm quite new to LLVM and I want to update value of global variable in LLVM IR. I created new global variable in ModulePass: bool runOnModule(llvm::Module &M) { IRBuilder<> Builder(M.getContext()); Instruction *I = &*inst_begin(M.getFunction("main")); Builder.SetInsertPoint(I); M.getOrInsertGlobal("globalKey",

I did M.getOrInsertFunction and called the exit function with . IRBuilder<> builder = IRBuilder<>(...); Value *one = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(M.getContext()),1); builder.CreateCall(exitF,one,"tmp4"); "Instruction has a name, but provides a void value! %tmp4 = call void @exit(i32 1) Broken module found, compilation aborted! " On Thu, Mar 31,

I'm trying to insert some instructions before each function calls (before arguments push): lea %EAX, label ----- new instructions mov [ESP+stacksize], %EAX ----- new instructions push arg1 push arg2 ... push argn call callee_name I am a newbie to LLVM. I tried to use buildMI() to insert the instructions in the lowercall() function. But I couldn't

Hi, I'm trying to add function calls in the LLVM IR using the IRBuilder class. I've read both tutorials about functions but I still get assertion errors. I allocate memory for all function arguments and pass them as explained in the tutorial. My code is (this function is supposed to add a call to f in bb at pos): void addCallSite(Function *f, BasicBlock *bb, BasicBlock::iterator pos)

Here's a revised patch, plus patches showing how fpmath metadata could be turned on in clang and dragonegg (it seemed safest for the moment to condition on -ffast-math rather than on one of the flags implied by -ffast-math). Major changes: - The FPMathOperator class can no longer be used to change math settings, only to read them. Currently it can be queried for accuracy info. I split the

There is incompatibility between R strptime and musl libc. I posted about it on their mailing list, but they need more information I can't provide, so I'm forwarding the message here in hope R developers can help. Thanks. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rich Felker <dalias at libc.org> Date: Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:07 PM Subject: Re: [musl] strptime() question To: Alba

I don't think it's the same problem as you described. By printing I meant calling printf function and passing my global variable as one of the arguments. My code: Instruction* InstructionVisitor::incrementGlobalKey(Instruction* I) { IRBuilder<> Builder(I->getContext()); Builder.SetInsertPoint(I->getNextNode()); GlobalVariable* key =