similar to: Building LLVM 3.7.1 on OS X

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Building LLVM 3.7.1 on OS X"

2016 Feb 25
2
[llvm-3.8-ec3] cmake-2.8.12 and gcc-4.6: Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but cannot find it.
Hi, when I switch to an unsupported GCC like v4.6.4 to build LLVM v3.8-rc3 with cmake I get the following: ... -- Looking for __atomic_fetch_add_4 in atomic -- Looking for __atomic_fetch_add_4 in atomic - not found CMake Error at cmake/modules/CheckAtomic.cmake:36 (message): Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but cannot find it. Call Stack (most recent call first):
2019 Nov 13
2
Compiling libc++ using GNU Arm Embedded Toolchain for arm-cortex-m4
Hello, lately, I have been thinking about how to resolve the problem with that the program size increases enormously when including <iostream> when compiling with libstdc++. In this library, in <iostream> there is a static object __ioinit initialized like so: ... // For construction of filebuffers for cout, cin, cerr, clog et. al. static ios_base::Init __ioinit; ... This
2019 Jun 08
2
Help Building LLVM for Android
Hey Guys, I'm working on a project in Android related to System-level Audio DSP Effects for Tuning Android Audio. I want to leverage Faust ( https://faust.grame.fr/) to allow users to program their own filters. Faust provides a libfaust implementation which includes a JIT Compiler which leverages LLVM and seems to be the best path for me to use. Unfortunately I'm having problems
2017 Oct 31
3
Cross compiling for Baremetal ARM without using GCC
Dear LLVM developers, Hello, I'm trying to find a way of cross-compiling my c code against Baremetal Cortex-M device (so target triple will be arm-none-eabi) only using LLVM/Clang, and not using anything from GNU (ld or libc). I'm doing this to know which one of LLVM/clang and GCC produces smaller flash image size because saving flash is a big deal in our projects. 1) When I just follow
2018 Sep 17
2
build llvm fails under win7 x64/VS2017
my build environment: Win7 x64 VStudio 2017 Community Edition 15.8.4 (latest) CMake 3.12.1 (x86) git 2.19.0 (latest, x64) Python 2.7.2 (x86) my build steps: open VS2017 x64 developer command prompt cd D:\projects\fun\jit_tests mkdir llvm cd llvm git clone https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm mkdir llvm-build cd llvm-build cmake -G "Visual Studio 15 2017 Win64" -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON
2016 Mar 14
2
LLVM-3.8.0 libcxx in-tree build fails with cmath error ::signbit has not been declared
Greetings! I have been building llvm-3.6.x, 3.7.1 and 3.7.2 with (glibc-2.12.1, binutils-2.24, gcc-4.9.2) almost same set if CMake flags. However while building LLVM-3.8.0 using same CMake flags I am observing projects/libcxx/include/cmath errors... ...'::signbit' has not been declared ...'::fpclassify' has not been declared ...'::isfinite' has not been declared ...
2018 Aug 03
10
[7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged
Dear testers, 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the status is of the branch on our various platforms. Please run the test script, share the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans
2018 May 14
1
Unable to build 'lld' on Mac OS 10.9
Hi All, I am trying to build the 'lld' linker on Mac OS 10.9, but during the build, I am getting the errors. Following are the steps that I have followed: 1.     I have downloaded the ‘llvm-stable’ source code from the following location:   https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/tree/stable   2.     Machine details(on which llvm source code isbeing built) are as follows: $ sw_vers
2016 Mar 14
2
LLVM-3.8.0 libcxx in-tree build fails with cmath error ::signbit has not been declared
cmake -E cmake_progress_report llvm-3.8.0.src_bld_x86_64-rhel6.4-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles In file included from llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/include/__hash_table:19:0, from llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/src/hash.cpp:10: llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/include/cmath:310:9: error: '::signbit' has not been declared using ::signbit; ^
2016 Sep 20
4
(Thin)LTO llvm build
The configuration we’re mentioning is a 2-stage bootstrap: You need first to build without LTO your own clang, and then use it for the LTO build. — Mehid > On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:17 AM, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: > > I am the author of Polly's/ISL's platform tests and could reproduce > the problem on my system with this error message: > >
2016 Apr 25
2
bug: cross-compile Clang/LLVM for ARM using Clang/LLVM
Hi renato, 1. The command above is followed by the guide[ HowToCrossCompileLLVM.rst ] and I specify some path(ex. <path-to-host-bin>). 2. The including x86_64 libraries is added because of some missing libraries(ex. "error: Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but cannot find it"). As I have found that the bugs needed to dealt with is some ARM-dependent libraries, I
2018 Sep 19
2
CMake build of LLVM/clang with -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release does not create release versions?
my build environment: Win7 x64 VStudio 2017 Community Edition 15.8.4 (latest) CMake 3.12.1 (x86) git 2.19.0 (latest, x64) Python 2.7.2 (x86) directory structure test   llvm <-- git clone https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm     tools       clang <-- git clone https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang   llvm_build Debug build: clean build, llvm_build is deleted before llvm_build> cmake
2015 Oct 05
2
[cfe-dev] Orc Windows C++
It’s pretty intermittent at the moment…sometimes I get the relocation overflow issue, sometimes I get another issue about BSS sections having no contents. The source code to reproduce either is simple: #include <iostream> int main (int argc, char* argv[]) { } I’ve managed to reproduce the BSS section issue in clang consistently, and since that comes before terms of where it happens in
2018 Sep 19
4
CMake build of LLVM/clang with -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release does not create release versions?
>because with that generator the CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE variable is ignored >because it is a "multi-configuration target". thanks for the link, is that a bug in the CMake configuration (or better not getting any warning) or is there just documentation missing? so i can use --config Debug or --config Release and get the correct results - i hope that works the build takes hours
2016 Sep 26
2
(Thin)LTO llvm build
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com> wrote: > I finally got around to trying to build with LTO=Thin as discussed earlier. > > The results so far are negative, so I must have done something wrong. > > $ export CXX=clang CC=clang > > $ cmake \ > -G Ninja \ > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ >
2016 Dec 11
2
failing bootstrap: C++11 or greater is required but the compiler does not support c++11
On Dec 11, 2016, at 3:33 AM, Eric Fiselier via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > So it seems that libatomic went missing between build #1379 and #1380, so I don't think this is related to the -std=c++11 failure. Instead it seems likely that the compile test for -std=c++11 is failing due to mis-configuring -latomic. > > Can you confirm the bot has libatomic
2015 Oct 05
2
[cfe-dev] Orc Windows C++
Oops, sorry for the spam. That last comment was incorrect. It’s IMAGE_REL_AMD64_REL32 not _5 > On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:26, Joshua Gerrard <joshua.gerrard at roli.com> wrote: > > Additional info: when the relocation issue does occur the relocation type is IMAGE_REL_AMD64_REL32_5 > >> On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:16, Joshua Gerrard <joshua.gerrard at roli.com> wrote: >>
2016 Sep 27
4
(Thin)LTO llvm build
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > > > On Sep 27, 2016, at 2:18 AM, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > >> I'll either need to get a reproducer from you and/or try to repro
2019 Nov 11
2
R en Jupyter Lab, error al cargar dplyr: "namespace 'rlang' 0.3.4 is being loaded, but >= 0.4.0 is required"
Hola Quiero ejecutar R desde Jupyter Lab y me encuentro con un error al invocar la librería dplyr. Este error no aparece cuando ejecuto RStudio. La sesión de R en jupyter lab: sessionInfo() R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05) Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) Running under: Windows 10 x64 (build 14393) Matrix products: default locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=Spanish_Chile.1252
2015 Dec 16
2
RFC: Extending atomic loads and stores to floating point and vector types
> > >>> - Once we add vector, should we consider adding other composite >>> types in general, including structs? C++ allows this, but has substantial >>> issues w.r.t. padding. >>> >>> I'd say possibly, but FCAs are poorly supported in the IR in general. I >>> am not willing to block changes for vectors on changes for FCAs.