similar to: Aligning Long Long Vairables

Hello everyone, Consider we have this following set of code: int foo() { int a,b; a = __builtin_XX(0x11); b = __builtin_XX(0x11); return a+b; } The problem currently is that LLVM eliminated the second call and copied the result from the first call into a new set of registers. Is there is a way to force LLVM to generate two explicit calls to a builtin function. The builtin takes in an integer

Hello, I just started using the GlobalISel framework. Is there a way to emit all intermediate invariants from IRTranslator to Instrution-Selection in a single instruction? It will be really handy. I mean something like '-save-temps' in clang. Best regards, Kumail Ahmed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear All, I'm a beginner user in R and I would like to make a quadratic and plateau model in R. Can you help please with an example? Thanks so much -- Ahmed M. Attia Assistant Lecturer El-Khattara farm Station Agronomy Dept., Zgazig Univ., Egypt Visiting Scientist Haskell Agricultural laboratory Agronomy and Horticultural Dept., Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln ahmedatia at zu.edu.eg

On 27 February 2015 at 21:26, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote: > Which brings us to my fallback proposal: what about disabling the > pass on darwin only? That's a decision for Jim/Evan. I'm ok if they are. > As for other targets, as a first step, making the pass run under -O3 > rather than -O1 is hopefully agreeable to everyone? Sounds reasonable.

Hi Ahmed, Did you run these experiments on a platform with a linker that makes use of the AArch64CollectLOH-pass-produced information? I'm guessing that the AArch64CollectLOH-pass information and a linker that makes use of that information could affect the profitability of the GlobalMerge pass? Thanks, Kristof > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi Arpith, That is exactly what it is :). My bad, I thought I copied over the libraries to where LIBRARY_PATH pointing but apparently it was copied to a wrong destination. Thanks a lot. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Arpith C Jacob <acjacob at us.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Ahmed, > > nvlink is unable to find the GPU OMP runtime library in its path. Does > LIBRARY_PATH point to

> On Feb 27, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> On 27 February 2015 at 21:26, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Which brings us to my fallback proposal: what about disabling the >>> pass on darwin

I filed a couple more, in case they're actually different issues: - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22412 - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22413 And that's pretty much it for internal changes. I'm fine with flipping the switch; Quentin, are you? Also, just to have an idea, do you (or someone else!) plan to tackle these in the near future? -Ahmed On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 27 February 2015 at 21:26, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote: >> Which brings us to my fallback proposal: what about disabling the >> pass on darwin only? > > That's a decision for Jim/Evan. I'm ok if they are. Jim, thoughts? > >> As for other

I would like to get the fortran code for the functions locpol and dpill in the kernsmooth library , the purpose is to incorporate other selection criterion for the bandwidth in which a varying bandwidths are replaced instead of the constant bandwidth. I will send you back the improved version as soon as I get the fortran code for the upper mention functions. ((LOCPOLY and DPILL )))

Hi all I installed *wine 9.6 on fedora4, IE6* , and *APPs* for *CALC TI83 plus * i tried to use the *USB *cable to connect to the *CALC* but did`t work then i used *serial cable* after i make *? ln -s /dev/ttyS0 ~/dosdevices/com1? *then i run the "TI Connect APPs" to coonect to the *CALC *it finds the *COM1* when it tried connect to the* CALC* but connection filed. any one

Hello, I want to display the variable names in stringref iterator. But it is not displayed using following code. for (set<StringRef>::iterator sit = L.begin(); sit != L.end(); sit++) { errs() << *sit << " "; } How to do this? Please help.. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes, it is breaking during the legalize phase, depending on which >> TargetLowering callback method we use. For example, Custom will let it >> through to instructions selection, which it breaks at the

Hi there, i recently installed centos 6 64bit version on my HPProBook4530s Laptop. i then issued the command to update the kernel only. it updated the kernel to latest stable 2.6.32-358.14.1.el6.x86_64 kernel. After update what i got is that my touchpad is not working. i am 1000% certain that new kernel caused this problem. so, what i should do with the kernel to overcome this problem or

Hi all, I'm trying to run an AGI in PERL which uses the module DBD-Oracle. Currently my AGI is working fine in my two servers but not in my other four servers. When I tried execute an AGI (as a user asterisk) in command line it works fine (even I also declare environmental variables in user profile and in my AGI), but when I tried to call my AGI (perl) in dial plan, it don't get

Hi all, This is covered by (struct-path aware) TBAA, but BasicAA disagrees. See the attached testcase, where it prevents us from removing the redundant load. For arbitrary GEPs, we can't decide based on constant indices (because of e.g., &A[0][1] and &A[1][0], with *A a one-element array). BasicAA has some logic to "try to distinguish something like &A[i][1] against

Thank You. Still getting errors.I have modified my instructions as you said as follows: def GATHER_256B : I<0x68, MRMSrcMem, (outs VR_2048:$dst, VK64WM:$mask_wb), (ins VR_2048:$src1, VK64WM:$mask, i2048mem:$src2), "GATHER_256B\t{$src2, {$dst} {${mask}}|${dst} {${mask}}, $src2}", [(set VR_2048:$dst, VK64WM:$mask_wb, (v64i32 (masked_gather

Hi R users, I need your help to write a code in r that does the following calculation from three different datasets; ac = 1/sum (NPP from date 1 to date 2, dataset=1) * (biomass at date 2 -biomass at date 1, dataset = 2) + (littfall at date 2, dataset=3). all the dates are in yr-month-day format. Which library or function Should I use to tell R do these calculations of these variables at

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Ahmed, > > Did you run these experiments on a platform with a linker that makes > use of the AArch64CollectLOH-pass-produced information? As Jim says, I'm on iOS, so yes. However, I'm mostly running tests with the pass disabled. > > I'm guessing that the

Hi Andrew and Willy, Thanks for sharing the info. As for enabling radius server debugging 'radiusd -X', made some test calls don't see the radiusclient sending data to radius server. However, using radtest or radiusclient testing, able to send data to radius server (after enabling debug). For further testing, on my other server using OpenSIPs, setup the radiusclient and data was