similar to: [3.8 Release] We have branched

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[3.8 Release] We have branched"

2016 Jan 15
2
[cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched
Hi Daniel, Thanks for trying out the branch :-) On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > Hi Hans, > > I tried the release branch last night and I'm having problems building it. The problem is that test-suite is now building as part of the Phase[123] builds (because this project contains CMakeLists.txt's now) but cmake 3.0.2
2016 Jan 20
3
[cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched
Hans, Daniel, How are things going? It's been 5 days and no word. I'm running the tests now, just in case, but would be good to know that no one would be committing to the release candidate 1 tree in the mean time. cheers, --renato On 15 January 2016 at 15:56, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From:
2015 Nov 21
11
[3.7.1 Release] -rc2 has been tagged
Hi, There was one problem in -rc1, so we had to do another release candidate. -rc2 has now been tagged and is ready for testing. -Tom
2015 Jun 27
2
[LLVMdev] polly trunk broken on x86_64 darwin
Tobias, The most recent commits at svn revision 240868 have broken the Polly build on x86_64 on darwin... [ 57%] Building C object tools/polly/lib/CMakeFiles/Polly.dir/External/isl/isl_int_sioimath.c.o /sw/src/fink.build/llvm37-3.7.0-100/llvm-3.7.0.src/tools/polly/lib/External/isl/isl_int_sioimath.c:1:10: fatal error: 'malloc.h' file not found #include <malloc.h> ^ 1
2016 Jan 26
2
[cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] RC1 has been tagged
Phase1 fails to build on openSUSE 13.2, can anyone see what's wrong from this log file? On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> > wrote: >
2020 Jan 02
6
error in building llvm with default options
hello, I am trying to build LLVM with default options. I am getting the following error message after make. [100%] Building C object tools/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/metadata.c.o [100%] Building C object tools/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/module.c.o [100%] Building C object tools/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/object.c.o [100%] Building C object
2020 Jan 02
2
error in building llvm with default options
Various options for reducing memory usage when building LLVM: * Don't use bfd-ld, at least use gold, probably use lld if you have it available * With Ninja and/or CMake there's some way to specify the maximum number of concurrent linkactions - lower this to fit in your available memory * If you're building with debug info: Use Split DWARF On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 5:21 AM Kókai Péter
2020 Jan 02
3
error in building llvm with default options
The last time this came up, we agreed something should be done to fix the defaults, but nobody picked it up and ran with it. I think there was consensus, it just needs legwork now. On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 11:58 AM Aaron Smith via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There was a recent thread on reducing memory: >
2017 May 02
6
LLVM 4.0.1-rc1 has been tagged
Hi, I've just tagged the 4.0.1 -rc1 release. Testers can start testing and uploading the binaries. If you still have bug fixes you want to get into the 4.0.1 release, you have until May 22 to submit merge requests. -Tom
2017 Oct 18
2
LLVM Installation failing
Hi I am trying to install llvm and clang on ubuntu 16.04, I tried installing them using apt command but while running the pass it gives me error "error: llvm/pass.h not found *#include"llvm/pass.h"* so i tried installing using the source code and building it my self, *make *fails at 98% with this error *collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit
2016 Oct 08
2
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4
Hi, Encounter a compilation issue related to c++. Software versions: - gcc 4.7.4 - llvm git commit 98a1ca117e6743dd7f2d505443a96f591d083eab Build log: Scanning dependencies of target LLVMLTO [ 53%] Building CXX object lib/LTO/CMakeFiles/LLVMLTO.dir/Caching.cpp.o /tmp/pkgs/llvm/lib/LTO/Caching.cpp: In lambda function: /tmp/pkgs/llvm/lib/LTO/Caching.cpp:74:7: error: looser throw specifier for
2018 Jun 08
2
Fail to install llvm/clang on debian
Hello, Maybe this is not a bugs. But i fail to install llvm many times and different machine(debian os). First, i follow the instruction: http://cilium.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bpf/#llvm But during in compiling, i alway get: ... /home/yubo/git/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/VirtualFileSystem.cpp: In member function ‘virtual llvm::ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<clang::vfs::File> >
2017 Aug 11
2
LLVM-4.0.1 build problem on Linux
Hi, I tried to build LLVM 4.0.1 on a Slackware Linux box with 3 GB of RAM using gcc-7.1.0. Near the end of the build process, I hit the following error: [ 89%] Linking CXX shared library ../../lib/libLTO.so collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] compilation terminated. tools/lto/CMakeFiles/LTO.dir/build.make:269: recipe for target 'lib/libLTO.so.4.0.1' failed
2019 Jan 24
14
[8.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged
Dear testers, 8.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r351980). It took a little longer than planned, but it's looking good. Please run the test script, share your results, and upload binaries. I'll get the source tarballs and docs published as soon as possible, and binaries as they become available. Thanks, Hans
2016 Mar 26
2
llvm build failed while Linking CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so
Hello everybody, I am very new to llvm and I am struggling to install it on my 15.10 Xubuntu with kernel 4.2.0-34-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux. I essentially intend to use the clang static analyzer, but it seems that I have to build it on top of llvm and clang. Unfortunately I run into the following problem. CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so at around 52% of the procedure
2018 Mar 31
1
using llvm DataFlowSanitizer error
Hi. I'm using llvm DataFlowSanitizer. I add such code in library libtiff. dfsan_label lt_label = dfsan_create_label("buf_offset", 0); dfsan_set_label(lt_label, (unsigned char *)buf, size); But when i compile libtiff with "-fsanitize=dataflow" option, then there is an error as follows: ../libtiff/libtiff.so.5.2.5: undefined reference to `dfs$jbg_enc_init'
2019 Mar 19
2
Building lld
I tried deleting my build directory and restarting from scratch $ cd llvm-project $ mkdir build && cd build $ cmake -G "Unix Makefiles" -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=lld ../llvm $ make I got this error: make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'llvm/cmake/modules/GenerateVersionFromVCS.cmake', needed by 'tools/lld/Common/VCSVersion.inc'. Stop. CMakeFiles/Makefile2:57166:
2019 Sep 13
2
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here
Thanks! I'll get this posted on the web site. The "Performing Test ... failed to compile" failures from cmake are not interesting. But could you look in the log file and try to see what were the tests that failed in the "check-all" step? On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:39 PM Neil Nelson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Xubuntu/Ubuntu 19.04,
2017 Mar 02
12
[4.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 has been tagged
Hello testers, 4.0.0-rc3 was just tagged from the branch at r296762. This is a release candidate in the real sense: if no major issues show up with this one, it is the version that will be released. Please let me know if you find any issues, including in release notes or documentation, which will be on the pre-release web site later today. Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp
2018 Mar 19
1
How to link against all available targets - problems with NVPTX?
As the question asks, I'm having some trouble using initializeAllTargets(). I have a CMakeLists that uses: llvm_map_components_to_libnames(LLVM_LIBS ... AllTargetsAsmParsers AllTargetsAsmPrinters AllTargetsDescs AllTargetsInfos ...) However, even with these, when I try to compile my program, I get linker errors: CMakeFiles/sxhc.dir/src/main.cpp.o: In function