similar to: Windows installer

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Windows installer"

2016 Jan 15
2
Building SVN head with CMake - shared libraries?
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Ismail Donmez <ismail at i10z.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> I’m kinda scared that you’re using it. What are you trying to accomplish >> that you are using it? Generally having LLVM split among that many >> dynamically loaded libraries results in
2015 Jan 23
5
[Bug 2342] New: ssh-keygen gives wrong error loading public key message
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2342 Bug ID: 2342 Summary: ssh-keygen gives wrong error loading public key message Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh-keygen
2015 Jun 17
5
[Bug 2414] New: ControlMaster directive should be ignored on Cygwin
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2414 Bug ID: 2414 Summary: ControlMaster directive should be ignored on Cygwin Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Cygwin on NT/2k Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee:
2016 Jun 28
0
ENABLE_TIMESTAMPS and update to CMake v3.5.2
Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I am in the middle of the fun and games of updating my out-of-tree sources > to the LLVM head revisions, and after updating to CMake v3.5.2 I am now > getting a warning that ‘ENABLE_TIMESTAMPS’ is being ignored. > > > > Has support for embedding the timestamp
2016 Jan 16
3
Building SVN head with CMake - shared libraries?
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: >> I am trying to enable this on openSUSE but it seems to break >> standalone lldb (note that we don't ship static libs): >> >> cmake -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ >> -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-stdlib=libc++ -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLI >> B=ON -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON
2016 Jun 28
3
ENABLE_TIMESTAMPS and update to CMake v3.5.2
I am in the middle of the fun and games of updating my out-of-tree sources to the LLVM head revisions, and after updating to CMake v3.5.2 I am now getting a warning that 'ENABLE_TIMESTAMPS' is being ignored. Has support for embedding the timestamp in the build been removed or is there a new way of configuring it? I generally build internal transitional builds with this enabled so that
2016 Jan 14
3
Building SVN head with CMake - shared libraries?
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Ismail Donmez <ismail at i10z.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Chris Bieneman via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Jan 14, 2016, at 9:38
2016 Jan 18
2
Problem with the way BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON handled in llvm 3.8
Hi, For lllvm 3.7 and before BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON would produce versioned shared libs like libLLVMLTO.so (symlink) libLLVMLTO.so.3.7 (symlink) libLLVMLTO.so.3.7.0 (real file) now it just builds an unversioned libLLVMLTO.so file which I believe is a problem because when a program links to llvm it generates a runtime dependency on libLLVMLTO.so instead of libLLVMLTO.so.3.7.0 which will break
2016 Jan 19
2
Problem with the way BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON handled in llvm 3.8
Hi, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > The LLVM libraries are not API stable (especially not the ones you generate with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS). Those libraries are really not intended to ship. I know that's why I need them versioned. Currently we (openSUSE) ship libLLVM package which will install libLLVMFooBar.so.3.7 files and llvm-devel
2016 Feb 23
3
[3.8 Release] Release status
I had hoped to tag rc3 today (I feel like I've said this a lot lately), but it's at least really, really close. I'm waiting for: - r261297 - Implement the likely resolution of core issue 253. Still in post-commit review. - D17507 - The controlling expression for _Generic is unevaluated New for today. Waiting for review. Thanks, Hans
2024 Mar 30
11
[Bug 3675] New: CASignatureAlgorithms should be verified before verifying signatures
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3675 Bug ID: 3675 Summary: CASignatureAlgorithms should be verified before verifying signatures Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.7p1 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:
2016 Jan 26
2
Problem with the way BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON handled in llvm 3.8
Hi, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > I think the right solution here is to fix LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB (which should work) rather than fixing BUILD_SHARED_LIBS which was never intended to work for this use case. > > Either way, patches welcome. This seems to be due to your commit http://reviews.llvm.org/D13841 ,
2020 Jun 26
14
[Bug 3188] New: Problems creating a second ecdsa-sk key for a second Yubikey
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3188 Bug ID: 3188 Summary: Problems creating a second ecdsa-sk key for a second Yubikey Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh-keygen
2013 Nov 22
3
[LLVMdev] [3.4 branch] SystemZ regressions
Hi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Richard Sandiford < rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes: > > Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with llvm > > 3.4rc1: > > Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one possibility, > which compiler are you using to build? Do you see the
2015 Jan 23
9
[Bug 2343] New: test_fuzz.c won't compile if ssh1 support is disabled
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2343 Bug ID: 2343 Summary: test_fuzz.c won't compile if ssh1 support is disabled Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Build system Assignee:
2017 Mar 29
2
4.0.1 Release Schedule + Need feedback for improving stable releases
Tom - In terms of release testing - What about using OpenSUSE build service? It could be possible to setup a toolchain and try to build a ton of packages. Most of this could be easily automated and you may significantly extend the amount of code coverage you get. I don't think build service is able to run make test, but you'd possibly flush out build and link issues. (As well as seeing how
2014 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] Build failure with libcxx
Ok looks like r207606 regressed this. CC'ing Niko. Niko, please see the messages below. This is on openSUSE 13.1 both on i586 and x86-64. Reverting r207606 fixes the second stage bootstrap. On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:19 PM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > I did a diff -u broken.ii working.ii and the difference explains the > problem: > > @@ -36617,7 +36628,7
2014 Mar 26
3
[LLVMdev] Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> > To: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 8:14:18 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux > > Hi Ismail, > > Is
2013 May 13
2
[LLVMdev] ASan unit test/libcxx build break
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:03 AM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov > <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> A recent change added defined(__linux__) condition to the code below. >> Now it says that on linux with --std=c++0x (or --std=c++11) the system >> stdlib.h header
2014 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Fri Dec 12 2014 at 12:55:01 PM İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Can you point me at an example? I've spot checked stuff and cannot see > > anything out of the ordinary... > > This is only visible in GMail for me but looks like Phabricator is now >