similar to: Can't find x86 AVX VPANDNPS intrinsic

I don't think there is an intrinsic. This is supported by native IR by looking for something like (and %a, (xor %b, -1)) On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Matt - > I think this should either be VPANDN (integer) or VANDNPS (float); there > is no "VPANDNPS". > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 1:32 PM,

Hi, A weird problem ... My PDC is running samba 3.0 cvs from a couple of weeks ago. the os level is set to 65 and that machine has been the master for my domain for ages, until last night. A win2k client machine stoll the domain and made itself the master for the domain, hence a few problems. I have cranked the os level to 80, however I'm pretty sure that is not supported/a bad idea/not to be

>From R-help, subject "Variable number of loops" I've opened a new thread, moving from R-help to R-devel .. >>>>> Jim Lemon <drjimlemon at gmail.com> >>>>> on Sun, 17 May 2015 09:19:06 +1000 writes: > Hi all, Given the number of help requests that involve > permutations/combinations, and the less than obvious > naming

What is the way to add an arbitrary fit from a model to a lattice conditioning plot ? For example xyplot(v1 ~v2 | v3,data=mydata, panel=function(...){ panel.xyplot(...) panel.loess(...,col.line="red") } ) Will add a loess smoother. Instead, I want to put a fit from lm (but not a simple straight line) and the fit has to be done for each panel

root@graff:~# xm usb-list-assignable-devices 1-6 : ID 14dd:0002 Peppercon AG Multidevice 2-2 : ID 051d:0002 American Power Conversion Smart-UPS 3000 RM XL FW:691.16.I USB FW:7.3 root@graff:~# xm usb-hc-create bosch-w2k3-pv 1 1 root@graff:~# xm usb-list bosch-w2k3-pv Idx BE state usb-ver BE-path 0 0 1 USB1.1 /local/domain/0/backend/vusb/55/0

On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 10:36:14AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Here in the Xiph community things are a little askew. The people > with the code (Monty, Jean-Marc, Josh Coalson etc and the Annodex > team) seem to let Arc (who has yet to show any contribution > anywhere near the same league as any of the above) run the show > and trammple over people who show far more merit.

Might I make a suggestion? I manage a few rather large cross platform projects which include embedded targets, Windows OS w/ multiple Visual Studio targets (2003, 2005, and 2008), and some Linux flavors. In the past we hand built all the makefiles and manually maintained the Visual Studio project / solution files, which has always been a pain. Recently we've made a successful partial

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:55 AM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 09 May 2015, at 02:53 , Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at ucsf.edu> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I spotted what looks like another(*) mistake in 'R Language >> Definition' on how subsetting should work. In Section 'Indexing >> matrices and

I have a 10 blade cluster of just hardware - I can install what I want, how I want. ? What options are there if I wanted to build the 10 blades as one large beast, but _NOT_ necessarily for someone doing grid-type work? ? ?Some users don't now how to program that way, but they'd like to have their program run on something that acts like a single processor, but a massive single processor

Hi there, I maintain the libvorbis, libogg and vorbis-tool package for Fink <http://finkproject.org/ >. Recently I had time to wonder about those again. In particular, since I was informed libsndfile self-tests fails with 1.2.0, but not with a version dubbed 1.2.1rc1 somebody sent me. Also trunk seems to contain security fixes. In https://trac.xiph.org/browser/trunk/vorbis/CHANGES

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93547 Bug ID: 93547 Summary: Built failed for "Mesa (master): nouveau: remove use of deprecated nouveau_device:: drm_version" Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

If the end user does not pick up the phone, is there a way to log to the CDR about the call file failing? /var/log/asterisk/messages does show a NOTICE message [2015-12-31 06:58:46] NOTICE[28059] pbx_spool.c: Call failed to go through, reason (3) Remote end Ringing [2015-12-31 06:58:46] NOTICE[28059] pbx_spool.c: Queued call to SIP/102 expired without completion after 0 attempts but I would

Hi, We just found the tinc, looks like it is really a better VPN solution than traditional VPN, I am wondering, is there some cases we can refer, like is there some big cluster running in the production environment ? Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi @all, I have a strange problem. Here is the setup: I have a bridging linux box with 3 NICs (Intel e1000). 1 NIC (eth0) connected to the internet interface and the other both (eth1 and eth2) are each connected to a different switch in the bridged network. I setup bonding (bond0) with active failover for eth1 and eth2. Then I added eth0 and bond0 to br0 and brought it up with an ip. I am able

Greetings all- For whatever reason of personal insanity, I've decided to start an Asterisk bookclub. Basically, we'll pick three books every month (a users book, a developers book, and another general interest book) and then read and discuss on IRC in the #asterisk-bookclub channel. The users' book will be something related to telephony or the technology related to being an

On Dec 30, 2015, at 3:09 AM, Thomas Zander <thomas.e.zander at googlemail.com> wrote: > On 29 December 2015 at 21:50, lvqcl <lvqcl.mail at gmail.com> wrote: >> So, does it make sense to #define FLAC__BYTES_PER_WORD (in bitreader.c) >> as 4 for 32-bit and as 8 for 64-bit targets? > > Your tests so far imply this is a sensible default. > I'd say go ahead. We

Maybe it's just the holidays... AFAIK, all the packages were tested and uploaded. On 29 December 2015 at 22:44, Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Got to admit, I'm curious too. I have finished migrating to the v3.7.1-final tags, and I'm waiting for the green light :-) > > MartinO > > -----Original Message----- >

# ldd /lib64/nut/usbhid-ups linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffdfe3e3000) libusb-0.1.so.4 => /lib64/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0x00007f98526e6000) <-- from libusbp-compat-0.1.5-r2 libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f98524ca000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f985212f000) libusb-1.0.so.0 => /lib64/libusb-1.0.so.0 (0x00007f9851f17000) <--

On 31/12/15 14:55, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 31.12.2015 um 15:43 schrieb James: >> On 12/30/2015 4:14 PM, Rowland penny wrote: >>> ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man >>> --infodir=/usr/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc/bind --localstatedir=/var >>> --enable-threads --enable-largefile --with-libtool --enable-shared >>> --enable-static

Rust pattern matching code can sometimes generate very redundant LLVM IR, in which several branches contain exactly the same code. LLVM successfully unifies that, but the dispatching mechanism does not simplify accordingly. I created a gist here: https://gist.github.com/ranma42/d2e6d50999e801ffd4ed (based on two examples available in Rust issues: