similar to: Running DCE after my pass

Hi all, In order to allocate memory on the stack there is AllocaInst instruction. What is the similar instruction/way to allocate memory on the global area? Thanks, Tehila. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150419/54298396/attachment.html>

Hi, I'm trying to change all uses of a global variable so they'll use a different global variable. For instance, I have: @a = global [100 x [100 x i64]] zeroinitializer, align 16 @b = global [100 x [100 x i64]] zeroinitializer, align 16 And I want to change the use %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i64]]* @a, i32 0, i64 %3 to %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds

Hi, I have some questions regarding outlining (extracting piece of code into a function): 1. Is there an outlining pass in llvm (IR)? I've found out CodeExtractor pass, but I'm not sure it's exactly the same idea. 2. How do I set the function name? And another question: Where do I control the execution of my pass? I'm writing a pass that first works on

Hi, I need to pass some arguments to CreateCall function (as Value *). For example, I need to pass a 64 bit integer (with a value I calculate). How can I convert the 64 bit integer to a value * in order to pass it? Thanks a lot, Tehila. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Suppose I have a pointer to "something" (a structure I defined) and I want to pass the pointer to a generic function, that gets a 64-bit address pointer. How do I do that? For instance: The function is: void Foo (void *); I get the specific pointer using getPointerOperand() on a store instruction that store to it: inst->getPointerOperand()->getType() Now I want

I searched google and did not find any hits on this being solved. I want to get ssh so I can the dsa/rsa style password it in an environment that uses dfs/dce authentication if that is possible (and it has not already been solved). In other words, I want to be able to log into a host as a dfs/dce user without typing my password. Before I dig into the code and trying to do this, I wanted

If I have: %x = call @externalFunc ... ; other codes where %x is not used ret ; assume void function and use dce optimization, will the call gets eliminated? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/DCE-and-external-function-tp29932485p29932485.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi Thanks in advanced. I'm writing a proxy server doing NTLMv2 authentication. I think I need a NetLogon client service . Is there any available library providing netlogon function? or at least an dce rpc library? an asynchronous library is the best. :) Thanks again. Derek.

These are already open. I'm pretty sure that NT4/2003 PDC's make a DCE/RPC over TCP connection to pull down the <1b> entries from the wins server. I have done packet captures on test NT4 wins server to see how PDC's pull their domain lists, and I see the port 135 three way handshake, which then gets switched over to a tcp port 1028 which is the dce/rpc requests and responses.

In practice, APT is not faster to build than rdf. The df calculator we use is linear time and quite fast. Updating is also pretty trivial since it's only deletes of dead and unreachable code. So anything it reached can be replaced with undef in most cases. Cd-dce is not slower in GCC than dce On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 8:31 PM David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com> wrote: > I think you

Maybe I was too quick here. Does gcc record the incoming edge to a phi? If so, won’t those change when you delete blocks in a non-trivial manner? How are those updated? From: David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com<mailto:dcallahan at fb.com>> Date: Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 7:02 AM To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org<mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>>, Hal Finkel

Hello, with OpenSSH_2.3.0p1 running in HP-UX 11.00 I noticed that the "SD commands" (like "swcopy") produce the following error when being logged in via SSH: ERROR: RPC exception: "Who are you failed (dce / rpc)" 11/29/00 11:20:18 MET Ideas? Regards, Ulrich P.S. Not subscribed to the list

Thanks Also I found that some cases are also caught by a specialized routine to remove dead loops which is missing the case I noticed. odavd From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org<mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> Date: Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 8:45 PM To: David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com<mailto:dcallahan at fb.com>>, LLVM Dev Mailing list <llvm-dev at

Hi leledumbo, > If I have: > > %x = call @externalFunc > ... ; other codes where %x is not used > ret ; assume void function > > and use dce optimization, will the call gets eliminated? only if the compiler can prove that the called function has no side effects (such as modifying some global variables or causing the program to exit). Ciao, Duncan.

Hi, On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi leledumbo, > >> If I have: >> >> %x = call @externalFunc >> ... ; other codes where %x is not used >> ret ; assume void function >> >> and use dce optimization, will the call gets eliminated? > > only if the compiler can prove that the called function has

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"David Callahan via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *To: *"Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin.org>, "LLVM Dev Mailing list" < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Sent: *Thursday, January 28, 2016

> only if the compiler can prove that the called function has > no side effects (such as modifying some global variables or > causing the program to exit). can it prove if the function resides in a shared library? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/DCE-and-external-function-tp29932485p29942236.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:21 PM, leledumbo <leledumbo_cool at yahoo.co.id> wrote: > >> only if the compiler can prove that the called function has >> no side effects (such as modifying some global variables or >> causing the program to exit). > > can it prove if the function resides in a shared library? Only if the right function attributes are added. See

I had assumed you would treat phi nodes differently from other operations in that they don’t need to keep the block alive just to retain the data flow facts but it would be simplest to do that. Thanks Daniel From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org<mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> Date: Friday, January 29, 2016 at 10:26 PM To: David Callahan <dcallahan at

> No, however it can prove it if the function is in a static library consisting > of bitcode files (what you get if you compile with -emit-llvm) and you do > link-time optimization. However it's probably simpler to declare the > function > as having no side-effects using gcc's "pure" or "const" attribute. Hmm... the library can't be made static so