similar to: Bootstrapping clang/LLVM with ELLCC

(Fixed the cfe email address) On 12/18/2015 09:34 PM, Tim Northover wrote: > On 18 December 2015 at 19:15, Richard Pennington via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> It turns out that it can with some simple patches. > This sounds really cool. I think we should seriously consider putting > these patches into LLVM mainline. > >> Information on

> ELLCC (http://ellcc.org), my clang/LLVM based cross development tool chain for > ARM, Microblaze, Mips, Power PC, and X86, now incorporates musl > (http://www.etalabs.net/musl) as its standard C library for Linux. musl is a > MIT licensed, highly POSIX compliant library offering high performance and a > small foot print. I spent several weeks evaluating musl before deciding to use

Geting a seg fault. Have not investigted the cause. rkotler at mipsswbrd002:~/richard$ tar vfxz ~/Downloads/ellcc-mips-linux-2014-Mar-24-07-32-26.tgz rkotler at mipsswbrd002:~/richard/ellcc/bin$ gdb ./ecc GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are

Hi, I've decided to switch from the NetBSD standard library to the musl library (http://www.etalabs.net/musl/) for my ELLCC (http://ellcc.org) cross compiler project. During my musl feasability study I made a Mips port of musl. A day or two ago, just to make things interesting, I updated to the LLVM TOT (r158294). I started getting assembler warnings about ".set nomicromips".

You may also take a look at the ELLCC project (www.ellcc.org <http://www.ellcc.org/>). As far as I understand it they produce and package cross toolchains for a number of popular targets. - Matthias > On Aug 4, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On 8/4/17 1:14 PM, Goran Mekić via llvm-dev wrote: >> On

ELLCC (http://ellcc.org), my clang/LLVM based cross development tool chain for ARM, Microblaze, Mips, Power PC, and X86, now incorporates musl (http://www.etalabs.net/musl) as its standard C library for Linux. musl is a MIT licensed, highly POSIX compliant library offering high performance and a small foot print. I spent several weeks evaluating musl before deciding to use it in ELLCC. The

Hi, I've updated the musl version of the clang/LLVM based ELLCC compiler suite to use musl release 0.9.14. As usual the musl guys have been doing a great job. The new release looks great! http://ellcc.org I've also started to port libunwind into ELLCC. That's the last step for a fully non-gnu run-time environment: libcxx/libcxxabi/libunwind/musl/compiler-rt for C and C++ under

With all the talk about using lld on the list, I thought it would be interesting to try using it in my clang based ELLCC cross compilation tool chain. http://ellcc.org The change was simple, since I use configuration files to tell clang how to compile, where to find libraries, etc. I described the config files here: http://ellcc.org/blog/?p=13246 All I had to do was change the linker

The clang/LLVM based ELLCC project (http://ellcc.org), after having reached a huge milestone ( http://ellcc.org/blog/?p=231) has now successfully compiled itself. The steps were: 1. Use gcc to build the compiler with Linux standard libraries. 2. Use ecc to build itself with libc++, libc++ABI, libunwind, musl, and compiler-rt 3. Use the newly built compiler to build itself again. One

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 04:40:44PM -0600, Jonathan Roelofs wrote: > Might be a helpful exercise for you to try building vanilla clang with > runtimes for the host, before worrying about how to build everything for > your baremetal case: > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#getting-started-quickly-a-summary So I did. :o) It was fun realizing how much Release type reduces LD

On 10/28/2016 05:27 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 28 October 2016 at 23:02, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Awesome results! > I'm surprised! LLD is barely working on ARM at the moment. :) > [snip] My mistake. ARM worked for small programs, but lld failed for clang with a bunch of these errors: /home/rich/ellcc-release/bin/ld.lld: error:

Well, at least it works on some programs across all arches. That was some great testing you've done for us. :-) Thanks! Renato On 28 Oct 2016 23:51, "Richard Pennington" <rich at pennware.com> wrote: > On 10/28/2016 05:27 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > >> On 28 October 2016 at 23:02, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>

LLVM Weekly - #39, Sep 29th 2014 ================================ If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/39>. Welcome to the thirty-ninth issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex Bradbury](http://asbradbury.org).

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:22:24AM -0600, Jonathan Roelofs wrote: > IIUC, you don't want to cross compile llvm itself (which is what those > instructions are for), but instead you want to *use* llvm to cross compile > things. > > To build your sysroot, you'll need to cross-build: > > 1) A libc. Good choices for that for baremetal are: newlib or musl. > 2)

ELLCC (pronounced "elk") the clang/LLVM based cross compilation tool chain, is now both self hosting and able to cross compile itself for other targets. http://ellcc.org/blog/?p=251 http://ellcc.org/ -Rich -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131029/ddda33bf/attachment.html>

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Richard Pennington via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > With all the talk about using lld on the list, I thought it would be > interesting to try using it in my clang based ELLCC cross compilation tool > chain. http://ellcc.org > > The change was simple, since I use configuration files to tell clang how > to compile, where to

I'm getting closer to having an actual release of my ELLCC collection of tools to do cross compilation using my clang/LLVM based compiler and associated support programs and libraries. I have one set of download binaries available, for Fedora 16 x86_64 systems. The download includes the compiler, binutils, gdb, precompiled standard libraries and qemu support for arm, armeb, i386,

Today the clang/LLVM based ELLCC compiler (http://ellcc.org) was able to compile an (almost) non-trivial C++ program for a bunch of LLVM supported targets with no gnu licensed libraries. http://ellcc.org/blog/?p=231 Next step: try to compile ELLCC with itself. :-) -Rich -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 28 October 2016 at 23:02, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Awesome results! I'm surprised! LLD is barely working on ARM at the moment. :) > I wonder if ARM32 BE is a real thing. I know that the processor is > bi-endian, but is there any system that uses ARM32 in big-endian mode? Yes... it is "a thing". :) ARM has two modes: BE32 and

I've been working on adding code coverage support to my ELLCC project (http://ellcc.org) and I thought it would be nice to fun the index page of the HTML output of llvm-cov into something a little prettier and more useful. The initial result is here: http://ellcc.org/coverage/ If there is any interest, I'll submit the llvm-cov changes. -Rich