similar to: [3.8 Release] Schedule and call for testers

Final has been tagged, I think we're about to release it. On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > Are we waiting for an RC5? It seems like the release mirror on github has > no recent activity. > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com > > wrote: > >> Quick update

Quick update before I move on to the final tag. > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz > Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken > symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and > looks good so far though Default options were all good. Mips32 was about halfway but was good so far. >

Hello testers, RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release. Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries

We got everything, haven't we? On 26 February 2015 at 20:44, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> wrote: > Final has been tagged, I think we're about to release it. > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Are we waiting for an RC5? It seems like the release mirror on github has >> no

(cc'ing non-legacy llvm-dev this time; apologies if you get this twice. Please don't reply-all to the first one.) On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > Start your engines; 3.8.0-rc1 was just tagged from the 3.8 branch at > r258223. (It took a little longer than I'd planned, sorry about that.) > > There

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > 3.7.0-rc4 has just been tagged. It is identical to rc3, plus: > > - r245902: Revert r245355: change of clang-tools-extra symlink in the > release script > - r245947: Merge of r245927: Fix LLDB build on MIPS > - r245948: Deprecate the DataLayout on the TargetMachine, and backport > the 3.8 API

Are we waiting for an RC5? It seems like the release mirror on github has no recent activity. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > Quick update before I move on to the final tag. > > > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz > > Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a > broken >

Hi testers, 3.6.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test and build binaries. The tracking bug for 3.6 blockers is http://llvm.org/pr22374. Please file issues against it. Thanks for helping with the release! Hans

Dear testers, 3.7.0-rc4 has just been tagged. It is identical to rc3, plus: - r245902: Revert r245355: change of clang-tools-extra symlink in the release script - r245947: Merge of r245927: Fix LLDB build on MIPS - r245948: Deprecate the DataLayout on the TargetMachine, and backport the 3.8 API - Changes to the ReleaseNotes. Those changes should all be safe, and I expect this to be an extremely

Daniel, Note the openmp library only has cmake build machinery preventing autoconf-based builds. Jack On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'll do Mips as usual. Are we going to do an autoconf-based build for LLVM 3.7? If so, I might try Mips64 packages too. > >> -----Original

Hello everyone, Please let me know if you'd like to help providing binaries and testing for your favourite platform. If you were a tester on the previous release, I've bcc'd you on this email. I propose this schedule for the 3.7 release: - 14 July 2015: Create the release branch. - 14 July -- 21 July: Testing Phase I. RC1 binaries are built and tested. - 22 July -- 29 July: Fix

> > Shouldn't we be > > moving to CMake based release anyway? > > Oh, the joy of having two build systems. :-( > > As long as we have two, it doesn't really matter which one we use to > build the binaries, as users building from source will still rely on > both to be working. > > - Hans On that subject, are you aware that the release builds for

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > Here's the current status for the Mips packages. [..] > clang+llvm-3.7.0-rc1-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz The root directory in this file is "clang+llvm-3.7.0-rc1-mipsel-linux-gnu". Is it just the name that's wrong, or does it actually have files for the wrong target?

> -----Original Message----- > From: hwennborg at google.com [mailto:hwennborg at google.com] On Behalf > Of Hans Wennborg > Sent: 22 July 2015 17:42 > To: Daniel Sanders > Cc: llvmdev; cfe-dev; lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; Ben Pope; Ed Maste; Sebastian > Dreßler > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [3.7 Release] RC1 has been tagged, Testing Phase I > begins > > On Wed, Jul 22,

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Daniel Sanders > <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: >> Here's the current status for the Mips packages. > [..] >> clang+llvm-3.7.0-rc1-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz > > The root directory in this file is >

Hans, Daniel, How are things going? It's been 5 days and no word. I'm running the tests now, just in case, but would be good to know that no one would be committing to the release candidate 1 tree in the mean time. cheers, --renato On 15 January 2016 at 15:56, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From:

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: >> Ben reports that he didn't get a tarball even after the rpath fix and >> had to disable -o pipefail to get one. Still not sure what caused >> this. > > 'make check' failures can cause this. I had to revert r241599 to get a package. Oh, I'm silly. Some part of my

Hello testers, Start your engines, RC3 has just been tagged (at r229050 on the branch). If this one looks good, it will become the release. There has been quite a bit of activity on the branch since RC2; let's hope it's all goodness :-) Please let me know how it looks, and upload binaries to the sftp as usual. Thanks for all your efforts so far! - Hans

Hi Daniel, Thanks for trying out the branch :-) On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > Hi Hans, > > I tried the release branch last night and I'm having problems building it. The problem is that test-suite is now building as part of the Phase[123] builds (because this project contains CMakeLists.txt's now) but cmake 3.0.2

> Ben reports that he didn't get a tarball even after the rpath fix and > had to disable -o pipefail to get one. Still not sure what caused > this. 'make check' failures can cause this. I had to revert r241599 to get a package. > Appendix: compiler-rt test failures > =================================== > Just to add Mips to this: On big-endian Mips32r2: