similar to: clang only spawns one thread

Hi everybody! Could somebody help me with the following? I'm trying to run a simple Hello World code in openmp using .C function. The C code i have is: #include <omp.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <R.h> void hello_omp(int *n) { int th_id, nthreads; omp_set_num_threads(*n); #pragma omp parallel private(th_id) { th_id = omp_get_thread_num();

Dears, I am writing a code in Fortran using OpenMP directives. When compiling the code in gfortran 4.4 does not occur any problem. When compiling the code in gfortran 4.6, an error message appears. In other compilers the error does not occur. A small example. ## Code in Fortran        subroutine hello()        implicit none        integer :: nthreads, tid        integer ::

I got this to work on Linux but it is not working on Windows. *My understanding is that this should also work on windows, is that correct?* If so, what should I do? differently? To get it to work on Linux, I modified my R script as follows: #' OpenMP Hello World #' #' @param nthreads The number of threads that you want to use #' @example #' hello(nthreads=2) #' @export

Hi everybody, I'm trying to develop an R package with Fortran and OpenMP. I wrote a simple hello world but I'm not able to set the number of threads. I found this old email chain <http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Set-the-number-of-threads-using-openmp-with-C-td2284685.html> and I tried to set my compile instructions accordingly but i had no luck. *This is my makevars:*

Dear R experts, recently I started developing a Rcpp package "OpenMPTest". Within that package I want to use OpenMP, as in the following code example: // header file #include <omp.h> using namespace Rcpp ; RcppExport SEXP testOpenMP( SEXP nThreads ) ; // cpp file SEXP testOpenMP( SEXP nThreads ) { BEGIN_RCPP NumericVector numberThreads = NumericVector( nThreads );

Dears, I am writing a code in Fortran using OpenMP directives. When compiling the code in gfortran 4.4 does not occur any problem. When compiling the code in gfortran 4.6, an error message appears. In other compilers the error does not occur. A small example. ## Code in Fortran        subroutine hello()        implicit none        integer :: nthreads, tid        integer ::

Can you send the IR you are using? Volkan On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:28 AM Erdem Derebaşoğlu < erdemderebasoglu at hotmail.com> wrote: > Thanks. I enabled my pass. I have one resolved issue though: > MachineMemOperand::getAddrSpace() always returns zero. How can I use it to > distinguish private memory accesses? > > Erdem > > ------------------------------ > From:

Hello, I am getting the following error while trying to build a benchmark with a custom function pass: clang -Xclang -fopenmp=libomp -Xclang -load -Xclang my_lib.so file.c error: unknown argument: '-fopenmp=libomp' If I use this instead: clang -Xclang -fopenmp=libomp -Xclang -load -Xclang my_lib.so file.c I get the error: fatal error: 'omp.h' file not found I am not

Hi Sanjoy, Yes, that's exactly what we have been looking at recently here, but the region tags seem to make it possible to express the control flow as well, so I think we could start with reg ions+metadata, as Hal and Xinmin proposed, and then figure out what needs to be first class instructions. --Vikram Adve > On Jan 19, 2017, at 11:03 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at

> On Jan 20, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Tian, Xinmin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sanjoy, the IR would be like something below. It is ok to hoist alloca instruction outside the region. There are some small changes in optimizer to understand region-annotation intrinsic. > > { void main() { > i32* val = alloca i32 > tok =

Yeah, I remember encountering that error before when getting it to pass the libomp test suite. If you have a struct named "ident_t" somewhere the compiler will rename it because of the conflict with the runtime declaration. This should be solved by casting the usage to the function type found in the definition (i.e. bitcasting a struct.ident_t.21 to struct.ident_t) which solved the

> On Jan 20, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Tian, Xinmin <xinmin.tian at intel.com> wrote: > >>>>> This means that the optimizer has to be aware of it, I’m missing the magic here? > > This is one option. > > The another option is that, as I mentioned in our LLVM-HPC paper in our implementation. We have a "prepare phase for pre-privatization" can be invoked

Hi, I'm going to club together some responses. I agree that outlining function sub-bodies and passing in the function pointers to said outlined bodies to OpenMP helpers lets us correctly implement the semantics we need. However, unless I severely misunderstood the thread, I thought the key idea was to move *away* from that representation and towards a representation that _allows_

> On Jan 31, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Tian, Xinmin <xinmin.tian at intel.com> wrote: > >>>>> Ok, but this looks like a “workaround" for your specific use-case, I don’t see how it can scale as a model-agnostic and general-purpose region semantic. > > I would say it is a design trade-off. I’m not sure if we’re talking about the same thing here: my understanding at

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Jack Howarth < howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > The current test suite status on x86_64-apple-darwin14, with the > proposed patch from > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150427/128219.html > applied to current cfe trunk, is quite respectable.... > > Summary: > S Number of tested Open MP

On 8 February 2016 at 22:56, <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > Imho it's critical to get parallel programming working on ARMv8 ( even if it's crappy OMP) to start. Please enable it and I'll run the tests against our internal QA and we can informally handle testing / guarding against regressions. So, I got some dependency errors while building OpenMP on my AArch64 box:

>>>>Ok, but this looks like a “workaround" for your specific use-case, I don’t see how it can scale as a model-agnostic and general-purpose region semantic. I would say it is a design trade-off. Regardless it is a new instruction or an intrinsics with token/tag, it will consist of model-agnostic part and model-non-agnostic part. The package comes with a framework for parsing

[XT] Back from Biz trips, trying to catch up with the discussion. >>>>I agree that outlining function sub-bodies and passing in the function pointers to said outlined bodies to OpenMP helpers lets us correctly implement the semantics we need. However, unless I severely misunderstood the thread, I thought the key idea was to move *away* from that representation and towards a

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Keith O'Hara <keith.ohara at nyu.edu> wrote: > > Check if libopenblas is linked against libomp or libgomp. > > I?d be curious to see any errors that arise when an OpenMP version of OpenBLAS is linked with R. > > Keith > The one time I tried compiling OpenBLAS for Windows 64 with USE OMP = 1, I got an error. I don't recall if it

Let me try this. You can simply consider the prepare-phase (e.g. pre-privatization) were done in FE (actually a library can be used by multiple FEs at LLVM IR level), the region is run with 1 thread, region annotation (scope, single-entry-single-exit) as memory barrier conservatively for now (instead of checking individual memory dependency, aliasing via tags which is the actual