similar to: Hexagon and choosing of slots

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Hexagon and choosing of slots"

2015 Nov 24
2
Hexagon and choosing of slots
> On Hexagon, the slot assignment is determined by the layout of the > instructions in memory. The order of the instructions in the packet does > not matter either in the IR, nor in the .s file, but it does when the > packet is encoded into the actual machine code. In LLVM, the Hexagon > shuffler orders the instructions just prior to encoding. > > Specifically, the
2011 Feb 01
1
Help need to define method of an s4 class
I need some help in defining a "print" method for my new S4 class definition. So fer I have worked like this: setClass("MyClass", sealed=F, representation(slot1 = "list", #create a new class slot2 = "vector", slot3 = "vector", slot4 = "vector")) setMethod("print",
2015 May 12
2
Unexpected failure when calling new() with unnamed arg and
Hi, The man page for new() suggests that if 'a' is an object with slots "slot1" and "slot2" and C is a class that extends the class of 'a', then the 2 following calls should be equivalent: new("C", a, ...) new("C", slot1=a at slot1, slot2=a at slot2, ...) This is generally the case but I just ran into a situation where it's not.
2015 May 13
2
Unexpected failure when calling new() with unnamed arg and
Thanks Martin for looking into this. H. On 05/13/2015 03:57 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> >>>>>> on Tue, 12 May 2015 15:18:42 -0700 writes: > >> Hi, > >> The man page for new() suggests that if 'a' is an object with slots >> "slot1" and "slot2" and C is a
2011 Jun 06
1
Seeking help to define method for show() for an S4 object
Dear all, I have created a new S4 class with name "MyClass". Please see below for it's definition. Now I want to create a method for the show() function for this class. In defining this method, what I want is, once user would like see an object of this class some values will be displayed. Then R will ask for **press Enter**. Once user presses enter then, remaining values will be
2015 Oct 08
1
Unexpected failure when calling new() with unnamed arg and
>>>>> Joshua Wiley <jwiley.psych at gmail.com> >>>>> on Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:19:16 +1100 writes: > Hi, I realize this is an old thread, but just wondering > whether a conclusion was ever reached on this issue? I'm > using formula(NULL) but it would be nice if default > initialization worked for formula classes as well. Well,
2015 Nov 16
3
DFAPacketizer, Scheduling and LoadLatency
I'm unclear how does DFAPacketizer and the scheduler know a given instruction is a load. Here is what I'm talking about Let's assume my VLIW target is described as follows: def MyTargetItineraries : ProcessorItineraries<[Slot0, Slot1], [], [ .............................. InstrItinData<RI, [InstrStage<1, [Slot0, Slot1]>]>,
2011 Mar 06
1
Seeking guidance in package creation when it contains s4 class
Dear all, I am having problem to create a package when this package is supposed to have some newly created s4 class. Here is my workout: > #rm(list = ls()) > setClass("aClass", sealed=T, representation(slot1 = "vector", slot2 = "character")) [1] "aClass" > fn1 <- function(x, y, z) { + x <- x[1] + y <- y[1] + z <- as.character(z[1]) +
2008 Dec 12
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 2
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect
2008 Dec 12
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 2
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect
2008 Dec 22
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 3
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on
2008 Dec 22
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 3
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on
2009 Mar 04
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 4
This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native
2009 Mar 04
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 4
This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native
2008 Nov 25
6
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a
2008 Nov 25
6
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a
2004 Sep 28
1
ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1
I get this error no matter what I do. I've tried switching to different locations on the TDM400p to no avail. I've got the card setup with the green module in slot1 and red in slot2. My config files are exactly like the "Configure Dev-Kit PCI (TDM11B)" example. http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=configuration#TDM11B When I run ztcfg -v, I get: 2 channels configured.
2005 Jan 15
0
ADSI unlock codes
Program your locked ADSI phone not by unlocking it but by using the feature slot FDN download descriptors of ADSI SEC security code telco provider lock number key from database list. ch33s3 First reset phone. Set clock to Jan 1 12:00AM (options-2?). exit to main screen. press options, (mute/flash/speaker/?) until you see firmware version. press # to reset. google more info, bam ch33s3d ;
2016 Jan 06
2
DFAPacketizer, Scheduling and LoadLatency
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 11/17/2015 12:26 PM, Rail Shafigulin wrote: > >> >> I tried setting >> let mayLoad = 1 { >> class InstrLD .... { >> } >> } >> >> But that didn't seem to work. When I looked at the debug output the >> latency for the load
2012 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] Target Dependent Hexagon Packetizer patch
Sure I will split it and put it in two patches. Give me few hours. I need to test those patches. Sirish On 4/19/2012 8:40 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:18:05PM -0500, Sirish Pande wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's a patch for Hexagon Packetizer for review. This patch does >> not yield any warnings. >> > Would it be possible to split this