similar to: Building SPEC CPU2006 Fortran benchmarks with llvm

Thank you Mr. Tim. I was wondering if you can tell me in which file 'get()' is defined. I am having trouble using this function. For example if I write 'get(AArch64::LDRXui)' then there is an error generated which says: use of undeclared identifier 'get'. Thanks again !! On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi

Thank you Mr. Tim. Is "AArch64" a namespace? Because when I tried "X86::MOV", it gave me an error saying that first define X86 namespace. Sorry if I sound stupid but I am new to LLVM. Thank you again. On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sachin, > > > int op = mi->getOpcode(); > > This is

Hi, We are using LLVM 2.9 (with the llvm-gcc front end) to compile and run the SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks on x86. We are compiling and running the benchmarks on a an Intel Xeon E5540 processor running Ubuntu 10.10 (64-bit version). For the native x86-64 target, we are using the following command-line arguments: -O3 -march=core2 -mtune=core2 and are getting compile-time errors on the gamess and

Hi all, I would like to compile the benchmarks in the SPEC CPU2006 using different compilers and then see the differences in performance in the code generated by these compilers. One of these compilers is LLVM. So, I'd like to know how to compile and execute the programs in the SPEC CPU2006 using LLVM. I already did it by configuring the SPEC as an external project in the LLVM test suite but

Can't you just compile the SPEC binaries and use a script in a scripting language of your choice to run them? Cameron On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to compile the benchmarks in the SPEC CPU2006 using > different compilers and then see the differences in performance in the > code generated by these compilers. One of

Hello, I'm trying to generate bitcode files from the SPEC CPU2006 benchmark suites. First I installed the benchmarks into ~/llvm/projects/test-suite/External/speccpu2006 and then I tried ~/mysandbox/bin/lnt runtest nt --sandbox=sandbox --cc=/Users/asd/llvm/Release/bin/clang --test-suite=/Users/asd/llvm/projects/test-suite --test-externals=/Users/asd/llvm/projects/test-suite/External -j 4

Hi chenwj, first let me thank you for your quick answer. > From your cmdline, I don't see any option to make clang output bitcode. If you > want bitcode, try something like `clang -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc`. I added --enable-jit because I had hope this would make LNT run the JIT tests. I thought this process would cause the creation of bitcode files and then execute them

> ~/mysandbox/bin/lnt runtest nt --sandbox=sandbox --cc=/Users/asd/llvm/Release/bin/clang --test-suite=/Users/asd/llvm/projects/test-suite --test-externals=/Users/asd/llvm/projects/test-suite/External -j 4 --only-test=External/SPEC --enable-jit From your cmdline, I don't see any option to make clang output bitcode. If you want bitcode, try something like `clang -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o

Hello all, I need to modify llvm bytecode / native code just before it is emitted i.e. after all the regular operations and optimizations are done. I was told that this can be achieved by implementing a MachineFunctionPass. I searched the internet for some tutorials or some example MachineFunctionPass but found nothing. Kindly point some links, or anything that may help. Thank you. Regards,

Hello, I am writing a MachineFunctionPass that inspects the generated machine code, and examines each opcode and its corresponding operands. If the 'instruction + operands' match a particular sequence, then the pass should replace them with a fixed instruction + operands sequence. I tried using MachineInstr's getOpcode and getOperand functions but the pass didn't work as expected.

Hello all, I am new to llvm. I need to make some changes to the LR. The backend should modify the LR, but only after all the normal work and all the optimizations are done. Just before outputting the native code, LR is modified. I was wondering if I should implement the whole backend in order to achieve this or is it possible to implement a new pass and use that. Thanks ! Regards, Sachin

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 05:04:34AM +0100, Andreas Donig wrote: > Hi chenwj, > > first let me thank you for your quick answer. > > > From your cmdline, I don't see any option to make clang output bitcode. If you > > want bitcode, try something like `clang -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc`. > > I added --enable-jit because I had hope this would make LNT run the

Hi, I want to know what benchmarks can LLVM compile and run successfully. Such as SPEC CPU2000, SPEC CPU2006 or other benchmarks. Thanks Shengmei -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091221/ed70efce/attachment.html>

Hi All, I am facing miscompare error when running povray (and few other C/C++ benchmarks) from spec cpu2006 suite enabling FMA4 (and disabling FMA3). I have used -ffp-contract=fast to turn on this option. (Compilation options and targets pasted below). >>>>>>>> clang version 3.2 (trunk 163295:163308) (llvm/trunk 163295) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix

Hi, I am stuck on compiling SPEC benchmark programs. I could successfully compile and run my pass on SPEC CPU2006 C and C++ programs. However, I couldn't compile SPEC CPU2006 FORTRAN programs. Note: I am using the *make *utility to run my pass on SPEC programs. Any idea on how to compile FORTRAN programs using *make *(instead of LNT)? Thanks, -- Rekha -------------- next part

Hi everyone, Is there a trick to getting the FORTRAN benchmarks of spec2006 to compile using the nightly tester? The configure script correctly located my f2c installation yet the benchmarks do not compile. Thanks for any help. -- Matthew Simpson

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of "C. Bergström" > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:39 AM > To: Rekha R > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] on compiling FORTRAN programs > > On 07/15/14 09:29 PM, Rekha R wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am

Batch: For me, batch in its present state is broken and useless. My primary need for batch is to produce a final output file of a session after I have worked out a sequence of procedures. I save my instructions in a file that I can source, then run it in batch to have a copy of input and output together. (If there was a log file (or dribble), this problem would be solved.) At present, there are

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Li Shengmei <lism03 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > >          I want to know what benchmarks can LLVM compile and run > successfully. > > Such as SPEC CPU2000, SPEC CPU2006 or other benchmarks. llvm-gcc can compile essentially anything in C/C++. -Eli

Hello LLVM-people, I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000 benchmark suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support is already available it seems (using f2c). Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of Fortran-77 programs to C code (which is then compiled using llvm-gcc).