similar to: Moderators needed for LLVM Developers' Meeting

On 9/29/2020 14:37, David Chisnall via llvm-dev wrote: > On 28/09/2020 15:45, Matt P. Dziubinski via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hey, I noticed this talk from the EuroLLVM 2015 >> (https://llvm.org/devmtg/2015-04/slides/pslp_slides_EUROLLVM2015.pdf) >> on the PSLP vectorization algorithm (CGO 2015 paper: >> http://vporpo.me/papers/pslp_cgo2015.pdf). >> >> Is anyone

Hello All, The last two months I have been working on the design and implementation of a heterogeneous execution engine for LLVM. I started this project as an intern at the Qualcomm Innovation Center and I believe it can be useful to different people and use cases. I am planning to share more details and a set of patches in the next days. However, I would first like to see if there is an interest

Hi Ashutosh, Have you been following the recent Loop Access Analysis work? LAA was split out from the Loop Vectorizer that have been performing the kind of loop versioning that you describe. The main reason was to be able to share this functionality with other passes. Loop Access Analysis is an analysis pass that computes basic memory dependence and the runtime checks. The versioning decision

I like to propose a new loop multi versioning optimization for LICM. For now I kept this for LICM only, but it can be used in multiple places. The main motivation is to allow optimizations stuck because of memory alias dependencies. Most of the time when alias analysis is unsure about memory access and it says may-alias. This un surety from alias analysis restrict some of the memory based

> On Mar 3, 2015, at 1:29 AM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com <mailto:Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com>> wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > Thanks for looking into LoopVersioning work. > > I have gone through recent LoopAccessAnalysis changes and found some of the stuff > overlaps (i.e. runtime memory check, loop access analysis etc.). LoopVersioning can > use

Hi, Firts all sorry for my poor english I am doing a simple search with paginate, the problem is the search dont find the words within acutes (example "dont find sal?n if i search salon"). Its the code for the seach: def search words = @params[''search''].to_s.split('' '') array_conditions = [] for w in words array_conditions =

Hola a todos, queria saber si existe un comando que me permita sumar filas agrupandolas o algo asi y luego sacarle el promedio a eso. Tengo una matriz de datos con varias escuelas, cada escuela tiene distintos salones de clases, algunas 2 otras tres etc, y cada salon de clases tiene un numero de alumnos, lo que quiero es calcular el promedio de alumnos por escuela, y el promedio de salones por

more from the rails out-there-in-the-cloud buzz-o-sphere: http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2005/08/10/37signals/index.html _______________________________________________ Rails mailing list Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails

Proposal for extending the Loop Vectorizer to handle Outer Loops ================================================================ Goal: ----- We propose to extend the innermost Loop Vectorizer to also handle outerloops (cf.[1]). Our aim is to best leverage the efforts already invested in the existing innermost Loop Vectorizer rather than introduce a separate pass dedicated to outerloop

----- Original Message ----- From: Claude de Limelette de Belgique To: tarkin-dev-request@lists.xiph.org Cc: vorbis-dev-request@lists.xiph.org Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:15 AM Subject: Fw: Souscription - Newsletter Ogg Vorbis en fran?ais ! ----- Original Message ----- From: Claude de Limelette de Belgique To: tremor-request@xiph.org Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:13 AM

Hi All, Our team at Hip-Hop Virtual Machine (http://hhvm.com<http://hhvm.com/>) have been experimenting with using LLVM as a code generator for x86-64. We have been successfully running it for quite some time as a secondary back end. We had to modify our version of LLVM and our mods were based on 3.5 release. At this point we feel our requirements have become stable enough to start

Hi all, Is there any way to cross-compile LLVM and run check-all, or just the llvm-lit tests, (after moving the build directory) on the target machine? As far as I can tell from the CMakefiles, there's support only for cross-compiling LLVM and not for running the tests with the resulting compiler. Thanks, Vasileios

Hi all, My understanding is that we keep around KILL instructions in order to keep the results of the various register liveness analysis passes valid. Consider for example the following machine basic block: BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry Live Ins: %A0_64 %A1_64 %V0_64<def> = AND64 %A0_64<kill>, %A1_64<kill> %V0<def> = KILL %V0,

All, I'm needing volunteers to help moderate the sessions of the LLVM Developers' Meeting. All you need to do is introduce the speaker, make sure the speaker stays on time, and run Q&A at the end (run a microphone, select people, etc). Its a pretty easy job, but critical for our meeting to run smoothly. Lightning talks are slightly different in that you will moderate each 5 minute

The 2017 LLVM Developers’ Meeting relies on volunteers to keep things running smoothly. Moderators are critical to this as they keep speakers on track and facilitate Q&A after the talk. I’m looking for community members who would be attending specific talks anyway, to volunteer to moderate the session. If you are interested in volunteering, please respond to this email with your first and

On 09/27/2015 06:41 PM, Vasileios Kalintiris wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Clang doesn't have support for MIPS I. The trap-on-condition instructions were added in MIPS II and they should work fine. This is why it works with ".set mips32r2". > > Which version of the ISA did you specify when you used the integrated assembler? > > Thanks, > Vasileios > > Hi

On 9/8/15, 9:35 AM, "Philip Reames" <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: >On 09/04/2015 11:36 AM, Brett Simmers via llvm-dev wrote: >> On 9/4/15 1:12 AM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev wrote: >>> Specifically on "Location records" -- >>> >>> Is it legal for the optimizer to drop the `!locrec` metadata that you >>> attach to

One idea for a hacking session would be a "performance analysis workshop". People could bring their apps, we could sample them track down what part of the compiler would need to change and code it up (if time allowed). Given the trade offs involved, it could be helpful to many folks, the trick is to get the right people to show up. -Chris On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Joe Abbey

Hi All, I am trying to build firefox with clang in Ubuntu 14.04 64bit. There is always configure failed errors problem. I follow compiling firefox with clang on linux <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Compiling_Firefox_With_Clang_On_Linux>. I add "export CC=clang export CXX=clang++" to mozconfig file. I wonder whether you guys have built firefox with clang in Linux. Could

The latest TOT of libunwind fails for me when I build UnwindRegistersSave.S for the Mips. My copy of clang uses a 2.25 binutils Mips assembler. This is the message I get: "/home/rich/ellcc/bin/mips-elf-as" -o /tmp/UnwindRegistersSave-a2c974.o -EL /tmp/UnwindRegistersSave-545450.s src/UnwindRegistersSave.S: Assembler messages: src/UnwindRegistersSave.S:99: Error: opcode not