similar to: Question about METADATA_BLOCKs in bitcode

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Question about METADATA_BLOCKs in bitcode"

2012 Sep 26
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
Hi Jan, > I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is one > simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. See > this spreadsheet for some rough data: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRrJHQc4_bddEtJdjdIek5fMDdIdFFIZldZXzdWa0E the improvement is wonderful! ... > In any case, the patch is attached if
2012 Sep 26
9
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
Hi all, I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is one simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. See this spreadsheet for some rough data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRrJHQc4_bddEtJdjdIek5fMDdIdFFIZldZXzdWa0E The change is in how operand ids are encoded in bitcode files. Rather than use an "absolute
2004 Sep 10
2
Storing FLAC in Matroska
Hello, I'm looking into storing FLAC audio in Matroska and I have a few questions. 1. Can I use libflac to extract the compressed frames? Or will I need to write up a simple file parser? 2. What is required to decode the frames? From the docs I understand that you need the FRAME and you may need the METADATA_BLOCK. Thanks, Jory Stone jcsston@toughguy.net Matroska, the new,
2007 Jan 07
1
METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE question
Hi everybody, I have a question about the following part of the METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE specification. The components: Width, Height, Color Depth, and Colors Used don't provide an "unknown" value and seem to assume that the program encoding the METADATA_BLOCK will be aware of these components of the file. As these fields seem to just provide "extra" information (I'm
2017 Apr 04
3
RFC: Adding a string table to the bitcode format
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > On 2017-Apr-04, at 12:12, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 3, 2017, at 7:08 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: >>
2004 Sep 10
2
Storing FLAC in Matroska
First, Thank you for your answers. I using the following code to try simply decode a flac file and write the decoded data raw PCM file. The resulting file is just noise and pops, so is the decoded data in a different format than PCM? struct flacData { FILE *inputFile; FILE *outputFile; char *filename; }; FLAC__StreamDecoderReadStatus flac_DecoderReadCallback(const FLAC__StreamDecoder
2011 Jan 20
1
Flac] Where Cover Art?
"Santiago Jimeno" wrote: > Flac files, as us knows, follows the Vorbis Tags system included in block 4 > Recently Vorbis has established the possibility to include picture files by > means of 2 Tags: COVERARTMIME AND COVERART. > To work therewith is quite easy. No. this in incorrect. The VorbisComment "COVERART" was only ever unofficial, and has been deprecated
2009 Oct 31
3
[LLVMdev] Something wrong with my libpthread.so
Hi,all I tried to run the generated whole-program bitcode of BIND,but I got some information: 0 lli 0x0000000000feda16 1 lli 0x0000000000fed88f 2 libpthread.so.0 0x0000003df340eee0 3 libc.so.6 0x0000003df28332f5 gsignal + 53 4 libc.so.6 0x0000003df2834b20 abort + 384 5 libc.so.6 0x0000003df282c2fa __assert_fail + 234 6 lli
2009 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] Something wrong with my libpthread.so
Hi, On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Nan Zhu <zhunansjtu at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi,all > > I tried to run the generated whole-program bitcode of BIND,but I got some > information: > > 0   lli             0x0000000000feda16 > 1   lli             0x0000000000fed88f > 2   libpthread.so.0 0x0000003df340eee0 > 3   libc.so.6       0x0000003df28332f5 gsignal + 53 >
2009 Nov 01
1
[LLVMdev] Something wrong with my libpthread.so
Mahadevan R wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Nan Zhu <zhunansjtu at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi,all >> >> I tried to run the generated whole-program bitcode of BIND,but I got some >> information: >> >> 0 lli 0x0000000000feda16 >> 1 lli 0x0000000000fed88f >> 2 libpthread.so.0
2004 Sep 10
0
Storing FLAC in Matroska
--- Jory <jcsston@ToughGuy.net> wrote: > Hello, > I'm looking into storing FLAC audio in Matroska and I have a few > questions. > > 1. Can I use libflac to extract the compressed frames? > Or will I need to write up a simple file parser? I'm not sure I understand your question, but one unfortunate fact about native FLAC is that you cannot discover the frame
2004 Sep 10
2
Bug with FLAC raw encoding
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Josh Coalson wrote: > sounds great. I've been thinking about adding a > 'what uses FLAC' set of links to the web page... > please keep me posted. The latest version of my cue+wav splitter supports .flac files. Hope to get it released this weekend. Will eventually be at: www.lameb.fsnet.co.uk It also supports .shn and .ape. I've seen shorten
2011 Jan 23
0
Flac] Where Cover Art?
OK Martin. Thank you for the explanations and for your time. I am writing a program that reads and writes all existent Tags types. It lacks only to end the edition (rewriting) of "Native" Flac and Matroska. Both cases for the same problem: the separation of Tags and Picture in different blocks. In Flac I resolved it, but now I have to add METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE. Reading Vorbis
2011 Jan 22
0
Flac] Where Cover Art?
You said "With the exception of where to put a picture file, VorbisComments in a Vorbis stream are the same as VorbisComments in a FLAC stream." In METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE case they would not be the same. Up to now we could exchange the complete block of VorbisComments. But with the addiction of METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE doesn't happen this way. In Ogg files the METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE
2016 Jun 25
0
reassessing the HCL ratings scale
Here is our current rating scale for the HCL: 1 = protocol based on reverse engineering 2 = based on fragments of publicly available protocol 3 = based on publicly available protocol 4 = vendor provided protocol 5 = vendor provided protocol and hardware I was going to suggest a few changes to the ratings we have assigned (for instance, not having a rating of "5" with an
2013 Jan 12
5
Tag flac as flac 1.2.1_git
I seem to recall that changes in the second number indicated a minor change in the *format* of the file itself (for example, 1.1.x to 1.2.x introduced a new rice coding option used for 24-bit files). Are there any format changes that would justify that ? Otherwise, 1.2.2 would seem more appropriate, not to minimize the work that you are doing... Cheers, Pyt. http://www.mjuware.com On Sat, Jan
2013 Jan 12
2
Tag flac as flac 1.2.1_git
On Jan 12, 2013, at 05:30, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 12-01-13 08:23, pyth.flac-dev.5.pyt at spamgourmet.com wrote: >> I seem to recall that changes in the second number indicated a minor >> change in the *format* of the file itself (for example, 1.1.x to >> 1.2.x >> introduced a new rice coding option used for 24-bit files). > > Well, the only change in
2015 May 15
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: ThinLTO Impementation Plan
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > > On 2015-May-15, at 07:30, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > > > >>> a. Lazy Debug Metadata Linking: > >>> > >>> The prototype implementation included lazy importing of module-level > >>> metadata during the
2018 Apr 23
4
Find/delete bad DNS Entry
We added a DNS entry to Samba via the Windows DNS Manager which apparently was invalid. Now we can't see the list of forward lookup in the Window DNS Manager because it immediately errors and we have to restart the Samba service. Running Samba 4.3.11-Ubuntu on Ubuntu 16.04 Additionally, a samba-tool dns query fails with the following error: > $ samba-tool dns query dc1.mydomain.com
2018 Apr 24
0
Find/delete bad DNS Entry
Hi Robb, > We added a DNS entry to Samba via the Windows DNS Manager which apparently > was invalid. Now we can't see the list of forward lookup in the Window DNS > Manager because it immediately errors and we have to restart the Samba > service. > > Running Samba 4.3.11-Ubuntu on Ubuntu 16.04 that's a quite old Samba version and it is EOL'ed. You really should