similar to: LLVM IR from static/dynamic libraries

Hi, Is decompilation possible in general to the SSA form for binaries? I assume one has to make certain assumptions about code in general to get tools like these to work. For example if code like with dlsym or jit heap allocated functions can be incorporated at runtime it would seem that in general it is quite difficult to ascertain the boundaries of a basic block and insert the correct phi

Hi, I am newbie for LLVM. I need some help, I want to disassemble ARM binaries and perform some operation on LLVM IR and again back to generate ARM binary from modified ARM LLVM IR. How I can proceed for the same. Any tool or document will be highly appreciated. Thanks and Regards, Deep -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Herbie, thanks for you answer and explanation. > > Also, if any of the functions are external, you are completely stuck (unless you put everything together with lld). I am indeed having a problem regarding external function. I my program is just one file everything work and I can access all the functions. However, if it has multiple files I have a lot of unresolved pointers to

Thanks for your response. In your experience, was it worth the conversion hassle and code expansion to have the code in a platform-independent SSA form and be able to apply LLVM-based analysis tools? Or is it better to convert to another IR (such as BAP[1]) and work in that form? Bob [1] Binary Analysis Platform, http://bap.ece.cmu.edu/ --- On Thu, 6/10/10, Nathan Jeffords <blunted2night at

This might be a very beginner question, but I'm looking for an example for something that I have never done. Suppose that I wanted to express actions with respect to lifted semantics of CPU instructions to an intermediate representation, BAP IL or LLVM IR. How might I go about providing a Backus Naur Form specification and then dynamically interpreting those lifted instructions by also

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some >> supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like >> something that would be feasible? There's plenty of variations on the idea: Revgen/S2E, Fracture, Dagger (my own), libcpu, several closed-source ones used by

This may be a dumb question, but here goes So I''m running on Puppet 3.1.1 on RHEL5, and i''ve been using Hiera since 2.5/2.6 ish and it''s been great!! I was reading up on Automatic Parameter Lookups and would love to use it for my modules. But I can''t seem to ever get Hiera/Puppet to load the value i''ve set in my yaml files. I feel like I must be

I want to transform elf binary to llvm IR, and do some instrumentation based on llvm. Is there any tool which can do the transformation? Thanks in advance. - mudongliang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150717/abee5f23/attachment.html>

Hi I was wondering if there is any way we can run whole program analysis on more than just one compilation unit. I would like to include the dynamically loaded libraries into the call graph too. Is there a way to do that? Thanks and Regards Rohit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 3/12/15 8:14 PM, Daniel Dilts wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Ahmed Bougacha > <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com <mailto:ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: > >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some > >> supported target) to LLVM IR?

On 01/21/2016 01:51 PM, Sean Silva wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Philip Reames > <listmail at philipreames.com <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>> wrote: > > > > On 01/19/2016 09:04 PM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> AFAIK, the cost of a well-predicted, not-taken branch is the same >> as a nop on every x86

Dear All, I am following a flow to generate object files(.o) from input (.s assembly) files. The input .s is given to AsmParser, which creates MCInst after matching instruction opcode. These MCInst are converted to MCStream and then finally emitting to an object file using Target Code Emitter. I am considering whether hazard recognition can be done on the list of MCInst, which I get after

Hi, I'd like to make a legend with a mix of mathematical symbol (tau), numeric variable and character variables.I have tried : types<-c("Type 1","Type 2","Type 2") tau<-c(1,3,2) legend(x="topright",legend=paste(types,"tau=",expression(tau))) but it doesn't work: the 'tau' symbol is not written in its 'symbol

Vedant, Thanks for building the packages before. Could you detail what's required to build these binaries on macOS so that someone else could replicate it? Thanks, Tobias On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 8:29 PM Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Gio, > > I prepared the macOS packages for the past few releases, but have less time to keep up with

My problem is simple and I've issued it about 3 weeks ago. I want the UAs to authenticate with a number to the SIP server. Is this possible? For example, I configured an AT-RG613TX (Allied Telesyn Residential Gateway). In its configuration it is not possible for me to skip specifying a number (ex. 102) along with the username. I've looked into the source code (SIP implementation) of

Should the binaries included in an LLVM release be generally useful to a wide audience of toolchain users, or is it OK to ship tools that are only really useful for LLVM development? If the former is the case, can we consider not shipping tools which are exclusively for testing the compiler? E.g removing these 5 binaries from 5.0.2-rc1 would have saved over a hundred megabytes in uncompressed

> On Sep 22, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > > Ah, the problem goes away once I build clang-func-mapping. > > I stripped some stuff out, but here's pretty much what clang/test/lit.cfg.py says my PATH is: > > ** PATH **: /Volumes/Builds/llvm.org-coverage-braces-RA/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin > > I wonder how

We apologize for multiple receipts. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eighth Real-Time Linux Workshop October 12-15, 2006 Lanzhou University - SISE Tianshui South Road 222 Lanzhou, Gansu 730000

Well, I've just added another directory to not make the redirected folders a the root. And, Favorites and Documents do work. Goog suggestion to check the Windows event viewer. I'll do that and get back with what I find. Thanks, --Mark -----Original Message----- > To: samba at lists.samba.org > From: James <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:14:06 -0400

Hi, I'd like to announce a new code coverage bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html The purpose of the bot is to make high-quality coverage reports available to llvm developers, and to provide additional testing for clang's code coverage implementation. The coverage data clang generates allows the reporting tool to render execution counts for code