similar to: Optimizer issues on Windows

This got me into thinking. Indeed the problem is related to Windows exceptions, so I am not sure whether the bug reported<https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24374> is actually fixed. Compiling Pony code (helloworld) that includes no exceptions does work fine (with optimizations). As soon as exceptions on windows come into play, writing the object file dies with the mentioned error in

… Also, it doesn’t appear that you are running on windows… From: David Majnemer Date: Saturday 12 September 2015 18:31 To: Sebastian Blessing Cc: Reid Kleckner, "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>" Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Optimizer issues on Windows $ ~/llvm/Debug+Asserts/bin/llc try.ll $ echo $? 0 On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Sebastian Blessing

Dear LLVM community, I am affiliated with the design and development of the Pony<http:/www.ponylang.org> programming language, which was recently published and has since been discussed on hacker news<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9482483>, reddit [1]<http://www.reddit.com/r/ponylang>

Since we are only a week away from branching for 3.7.0, this new breakage in the stage2 bootstrap of llvm/clang/compiler-rt/clang-tools-extra should get triaged. At r241513, a three stage bootstrap with comparision of stage2/stage3 files completed fine. However at r241594 we now have the new regression reported in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24054... Assertion failed: (Val &&

Hi, I am wondering if anyone could run ArrayBoundChecks located in SafeCode-llvm37 (https://github.com/jtcriswell/safecode-llvm37) on llvm-3.8? Thanks. Syed -- Rafi

Hello, Recently Jonathan Blow posted a short screencast discussing build time of his compiler with when no optimizations are run on the user's code. Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLk4eiGUic8 Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIjGYbol0O4 He discusses what parts are taking the longest to compile, and the ultimately shows this: http://i.imgur.com/BkbKcJK.png ...which shows that

Just got started and stuck at the same time. Working with the C-Api, i have come to the point where i want to emit a binary file for my module. I queried the X86-Target and called LLVMCreateTargetMachine this way: > LTarget := LLVMGetTargetFromName('x86'); > LMachine := LLVMCreateTargetMachine(LTarget, 'i386-win32-msvc', nil, > nil, LLVMCodeGenLevelDefault,

Already added in the commit (I think) On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:58 PM Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > If you don't use BBVectorize at all, you can ignore this. > > > > Hal suggested this in a thread in 2014: > >

Tobias, The most recent commits at svn revision 240868 have broken the Polly build on x86_64 on darwin... [ 57%] Building C object tools/polly/lib/CMakeFiles/Polly.dir/External/isl/isl_int_sioimath.c.o /sw/src/fink.build/llvm37-3.7.0-100/llvm-3.7.0.src/tools/polly/lib/External/isl/isl_int_sioimath.c:1:10: fatal error: 'malloc.h' file not found #include <malloc.h> ^ 1

I hope this is the correct avenue to contact the poolalloc developers. I'm trying to use an alias analysis from the poolalloc repository and can't get it to compile with the latest LLVM. CMake is now required for LLVM, I'm pretty sure at least, but poolalloc does not seem to use it correctly. The README in the project refers to the old Makefiles. I corrected a minor CMake error and a

Prior to "win32" i used "windows" 2017-09-19 19:09 GMT+02:00 Alexander Benikowski <sebal007 at googlemail.com>: > Just got started and stuck at the same time. Working with the C-Api, i > have come to the point where i want to emit a binary file for my module. I > queried the X86-Target and called LLVMCreateTargetMachine this way: > >> LTarget :=

Compiling the IR code at http://pastebin.com/hSwdLdD0 for target triple x86_64-apple-macosx fails with : assert(Symbol->isUndefined() && "Cannot define a symbol twice!"); `anon'::MCMachOStreamer::EmitLabel(llvm::MCSymbol * Symbol) llvm::DwarfDebug::emitDebugInfo() Line 1752 + 0x3c bytes C++ llvm::DwarfDebug::endModule() Line 865 C++

Hi, I am looking for genetic optimization package that allow to define my own chromosome solution and crossover/mutation opoerations. I checked genoud and genopt, not with much effort of 'cause, with no luck. Any one can shed some light on this? thanks.

Hi all, Can anyone give me advice about an appropriate way for extracting number of functions from module recursively (starting from entry point). Actually it may be more than one entry point so all dependent functions and global values must be extracted. I've tried llvm-extract tool but it can't do work recursively. Maybe it would be good to write some Call Graph pass or something. Any

Hi, I'm trying to get the pool allocator and safe code building against llvm trunk. I've run into a build error, and I see that in the past another user was told just not to build the pool allocator for use with safecode [1]. However, I really want the pool allocator transforms, so I just wanted to check why the suggestion was not to use it. Has it been superseded in some way by something

On 11 July 2015 at 13:14, Caldarale, Charles R <Chuck.Caldarale at unisys.com> wrote: >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Dibyendu Majumdar >> Subject: [LLVMdev] JIT compilation 2-3 times slower in latest LLVM snapshot > >> I updated my clone of the LLVM github mirror today and I am finding >> that

One of the arguments for doing this earlier is inline cost perception of the original pattern. Reading i32/i64 by bytes look much more expensive than it is and can prevent inlining of interesting function. Inhibiting other optimizations concern can be addressed by careful selection of the pattern we’d like to match. I limit the transformation to the case when all the individual have no uses other

Hello, I am Abhinav Tripathi, B.Tech 3rd Year student from IIT Indore, India. I was looking on the projects ideas page of llvm and saw that I could also propose to work on the SAFECode Open projects. As I found no mailing list on their site, I am sending this message here. Please redirect me to some other list, if required. . I found most of the projects quite alluring as I have been working on a

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:04 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote: > I don't recall anyone asking for the zip in the 17 years after that > change, until now (though I haven't been paying attention lately, since > I retired from building the binaries a couple of years ago). > > If you think it's worthwhile to do it, then I don't think anyone would > object if you went ahead and

Hi, I'm looking for a R-package that does feature selection for PLS using a genetic optimization algorithm. I couldn't find one on CRAN and I wonder whether there is a free one. I would be very appreciative for any help. Regards Rolf