similar to: LiveInterval and Loop Info

Thanks Matthias I can also use the method intervalIsInOneMBB() from LiveIntervals class to relate a LiveInterval to a MachineBasicBlock, right? Em 04/09/2015 2:26 PM, "Matthias Braun" <mbraun at apple.com> escreveu: > There is no direct support for this, but you can use > LiveIntervalAnalysis::getMBBStartIndex()/getMBBEndIndex()/getMBBFromIndex() > to relate the

Hello to all LLVM Developers. The LLVM IR is in strict SSA form (i.e. every variable is defined before it is used along every path from the entry to exit point)? According to the documentation, currently the LLVM IR is in the SSA form, but I don't see additional information about *strict* SSA form. The strict SSA form provide opportunities of optimization in register allocation, because is

Good Afternoon. I am a Computer Science undergraduate student in Brazil and as completion of course work, I am developing an register allocator, using the infrastructure of the LLVM. To accomplish this task, I have based my implementation in allocators already implemented in LLVM. But a question came to me while I was researching in books and articles of compiler theory and own documentation of

I'm working on my project for completion undergraduate courses, consisting of an experimental analysis of registers allocation algorithms. For this task, I am using the set of tools from the LLVM project. However, I have read the documentation of the LLVM project and not yet found a way to put the pieces of the puzzle together. So far I know: - As passes work as engage them to LLVM and

Hello to all LLVM developers. I'm developing a register allocator using LLVM, my allocator has a local search phase: given a solution (assignment of virtual registers to physical registers or memory) generated in the first phase of the algorithm, some movements are applied to this solution in order to find a better solution. To apply such movements, I need to unassign a virtual register from

Hi Evan, Here is a patch for the LiveIntervalAnalysis that we discussed. --- Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> schrieb: > > 1) What is the easiest way to understand which MBB a given > instruction index belongs to? All the required information is > available in the > > MBB2IdxMap of the LiveIntervalAnalysis class. Would it be useful > to add a small function

Thanks. One question though. Should getMBBFromIndex() assert if given an index out of the range or simply returns a NULL pointer? I would think the later makes it a bit more friendly. Evan On Feb 8, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Roman Levenstein wrote: > Hi Evan, > > Here is a patch for the LiveIntervalAnalysis that we discussed. > > --- Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com>

Hi Evan, --- Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > Thanks. One question though. Should getMBBFromIndex() assert if given > an index out of the range or simply returns a NULL pointer? I would > think the later makes it a bit more friendly. Yes. It would be more friendly, probably. I can submit such a patch, if you think it suits better. On the other hand I want to

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721 Summary: iptables-1.4.11 does not accpet raw udp ports Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hi, I'm trying to sketch an LLVM-based implementation of the Extended Linear Scan algorithm, described in this Vivek Sarkar's paper: http://www.cs.rice.edu/~vs3/PDF/cc2007.pdf Sarkar reports that this version of Linear Scan produces better code than graph-coloring regallocs and is also much faster (15x to 68x). I already started work on the implementation of this algorithm and have a few

Ok, just to clarify, RegUnits, as far I understand, are Physical registers or alias to Physical registers. They exist because some instructions use physical registers directly rather than virtual register. It's right? And why this RegUnits should be present in the Interference Graph? I thought were only the Live Intervals would be the nodes of the graph. Sorry about the trouble to

Hi. I executed the following steps to instal a Debina Lenny Vm (as the manual describe): 1)- xe vm-install template="Debian Lenny 5.0 (32-bit)" new-name-label=vmlenny_1 UUID = dd29fd58-9ed2-0d53-5a71-dea5bf0d613b 2)- xe vm-param-set uuid=dd29fd58-9ed2-0d53-5a71-dea5bf0d613b other-config:install-repository=http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian 3)- xe vm-start

Hi Roman, > I already started work on the implementation of this algorithm and have > a few hopefully rather simple questions: > > 1) What is the easiest way to understand which MBB a given instruction > index belongs to? All the required information is available in the > MBB2IdxMap of the LiveIntervalAnalysis class. Would it be useful to add > a small function

Hello. I'm from Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Brazil and I'm trying to adapt speex_echo.h (speex-1.2beta3-win32) to our video-conference software code. We are working on amplitude values, but I realised that in order to AEC works, one has to convert amplitude to frequency and filter the echo frequencies. So, my question is: Do I have to manually convert amplitude samples to

Good Night. I'm implementing a Interference Graph in the Register Allocation pass. I'm building this graph BEFORE any assignment of a virtual register to physical register. But I have a doubt about how to check the interference between two Live Intervals (i.e. They live at same point), should I use: L1->overlaps(L2) Where L1 and L2 are two different Live Intervals. Or should I use:

On Jan 31, 2008, at 5:05 AM, Roman Levenstein wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to sketch an LLVM-based implementation of the Extended > Linear Scan algorithm, described in this Vivek Sarkar's paper: > http://www.cs.rice.edu/~vs3/PDF/cc2007.pdf > Sarkar reports that this version of Linear Scan produces better code > than graph-coloring regallocs and is also much faster (15x

I have only one box[1] running 3 sub-systems[2] at my system, are these numbers resonsable[3]?? [1] - From dmesg (FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE): AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+ (1808.33-MHz K8-class CPU) real memory = 2080309248 (1983 MB) avail memory = 1997869056 (1905 MB) ad0: 76350MB <SAMSUNG SP0802N TK200-04> at ata0-master UDMA33 [2] The sub-systems are: 1 - A server giving adreesses of

Hi. I have a problem when defining a VM under XCP and use templates: all VM get a same disk size when I define it. How can I define a VM disk size before it is installed using XCP templates? Thanks very much. JoseFormiga _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi. Please, I need a XCP help. I have a Server with XCP 1.0 installed. Now I need install a Debian using a DVD ISO. Using the paper VM INSTALLATION GUIDE, topic INSTALLING WINDOWS VM, page 23, it does not work. Give a INVALID_SOURCE - unable to access required file in the specified directory: file:///tmp/cdrom-repo-_QPJLZ/install.amd/xen/vmlinuz. I am using a Debian 6.0 ISO. Some idea what is

Hi, Running doveadm on Alpine Linux will show various underlinking errors: /usr/bin/doveadm: symbol 'acl_user_module': can't resolve symbol in lib '/usr/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so'. /usr/bin/doveadm: symbol 'acl_identifier_parse': can't resolve symbol in lib '/usr/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so'. ... (complete list is