similar to: Windows build broken for me since r246156

What kind of missing symbols are you getting? I had to work around dependencies for a Mingw32 build. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D44650 On Wed, May 16, 2018, 13:13 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I have the git monorepo, and Visual Studio 2015. I am finding that > running a build from the command line with msbuild (as a nightly job) > invariably fails on the

I think MSBuild isn't capable of re-running cmake and then reloading the project files when CMakeLists.txt changes. It re-runs cmake, but then continues the build with the stale projects. That probably explains the "PipSqueek.cxx doesn't exist" errors. As for the link error, it could also be caused by things like a file rename not getting picked up by MSBuild. The fix is

I have the git monorepo, and Visual Studio 2015. I am finding that running a build from the command line with msbuild (as a nightly job) invariably fails on the first try, and succeeds on a retry. The first msbuild command looks like this: msbuild ALL_BUILD.vcxproj /p:Configuration="RelWithDebInfo" /m:6 /t:Rebuild This appears to compile everything okay, but invariably fails with

Here are a couple of representative errors. C:\Dev\upstream\gitmono is where I keep my clone. "C:\Dev\upstream\gitmono\wbuild\ALL_BUILD.vcxproj" (Rebuild target) (1) -> "C:\Dev\upstream\gitmono\wbuild\unittests\Support\DynamicLibrary\SecondLib.vcxproj" (default target) (170:2) -> c1xx : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file:

With VS2013 I found that editing a CMakeLists.txt file caused CMake to be re-run successfully and the build to also continue successfully, but since I switched to VS2015 the CMake re-run occurs - apparently successfully, but more often than not the build failed afterwards from either the IDE and from MSBuild. Since I seldom change the CMakeLists.txt files, I simply do a clean CMake configuration

msbuild is is able to re-run cmake if a CMakeLists.txt changes. CMake adds a special project "ZERO_CHECK" that does this. However, I am not sure it runs when invoking on the individual projects instead of the solution. Try the cmake --build command, which should output the following: > cmake --build . --target opt CMake is re-running because

I'm trying to get clang 3.6.1 to compile itself on Windows, using this command line: msbuild /p:Configuration=Release /p:CLToolExe=clang-cl.exe /p:CLToolPath=c:\llvm\build\Release\bin\ /p:TrackFileAccess=false /p:Platform="x64" /fileLogger ALL_BUILD.vcxproj It barfed on an occurrence of __try but that was only in a test file so I commented it out and retried. Now it's getting

>From my own experience this is what I think happens when building the whole solution through Visual Studio's UI. This also happens for building individual projects. I assume something similar happens when building via the command-line, but I rarely do that, so I can't be certain. 1) Visual Studio/MSBuild (I don't know which, but probably MSBuild) determines the dependency graph of

It looks like building ZERO_CHECK first to reconstruct the project files as needed, then running msbuild a second time to do the actual build, has solved the problem. At least, last night's run didn't take the usual two tries. Running msbuild twice is a little bit simpler than running cmake explicitly, the way I have my scripts set up, but I'm sure that would work as well. Thanks

Hi Russel, I never tried to build LLVM with nmake. With msbuild it works without problems. You can find a short desription here: http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_and_hacking_LDC_on_Windows_using_MSVC, section Build LLVM. Regards Kai On 24.08.2013 21:15, Russell Wallace wrote: > I'm trying to build LLVM 3.3 using cmake/nmake, Microsoft C++ 2012, on a > 64-bit Windows 7 system. I

I configured with this command: " cmake ../llvm -G"Visual Studio 16 2019" -A Win32 -Thost=x64 -DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_USE_CRT_RELEASE=MT -DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;clang-tools-extra;lld;libcxx;libcxxabi" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="/permissive- /D_SILENCE_ALL_CXX17_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS" -DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=17 "

Hi, I have just tagged 3.7.1-rc1, so it is ready for testing. As a reminder, when doing regression testing, use the 3.7.0 release as your baseline. Thanks, Tom

I configure LLVM build with this command cd llvm-8.0.0.src & md buildsys-x64-MT & cd buildsys-x64-MT & cmake -G "Ninja" -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_USE_CRT_RELEASE=MT -DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=1 -DLLVM_ENABLE_TERMINFO=OFF -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../x64-MT .. The number of build objects grew with every major release to 1660 for LLVM 7 and 1761 for

I'm trying to build LLVM 3.3 using cmake/nmake, Microsoft C++ 2012, on a 64-bit Windows 7 system. I tried it with the 32-bit compiler as a test case first and that appeared to work, then with the 64-bit compiler in the hope that would give me a 64-bit build of LLVM, but instead got this error message: [ 86%] Generating X86CompilationCallback_Win64.obj Microsoft (R) Macro Assembler (x64)

I'm trying to build LLVM 3.5.1 on Windows, almost successfully; the remaining stumbling block is getting static linking for release builds. The problem is that the .vcxproj is interpreted by msbuild to compile with the /MD option instead of /MT, as detailed in: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28262372/getting-msbuild-to-use-mt-staticrelease Haven't got any answers on that question,

2012/6/16 Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com>: > Under Python installation, you mention that Python is only needed for the > test suite.  This is not true, as the normal LLVM build still requires > Python. That's right. Now, python>=2.4 is essential. (In contrast, perl is not required, IIRC) > I would seriously consider splitting this up into

Okay, so trying a straight compile of the Python interpreter with clang-cl, I used the following commands: cd \python-2.7.10\pcbuild copy C:\llvm\build\Release\bin\clang-cl.exe cl.exe rd /q /s amd64 rd /q /s win32-temp-debug rd /q /s win32-temp-release rd /q /s x64-temp-debug rd /q /s x64-temp-release msbuild /p:Configuration=Release /v:diag /fileLogger pcbuild.sln (The second line is the one

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:01 AM, David Tweed <David.Tweed at arm.com> wrote: > | Certainly slow builders are problematic. The phase-based building > | system David Dean is setting up may help mitigate some of this (it > | should make better use of the resources we have, as well as allowing > | us to benefit (in the form of smaller blame lists, though not > | necessarily lower

RFC: lld- Add visual studio compatible diagnostics output to lld Hello all, We have a proposal to extend the diagnostics output capabilities of lld. ## Problem MS Visual Studio expects the diagnostic output of build tools to conform to a specific format, described here: [1] and [2] . Currently lld cannot emit warnings and errors in this format. lld prefixes diagnostic output with args[0],

| Certainly slow builders are problematic. The phase-based building | system David Dean is setting up may help mitigate some of this (it | should make better use of the resources we have, as well as allowing | us to benefit (in the form of smaller blame lists, though not | necessarily lower buildbot result latency) from additional resources | by allowing greater parallelism). There's