similar to: Configuring LLVM Sparc target for Leon 3 and Leon 4 variants

Hi LLVM and CLang Devs, At the moment my company (Movidius) is considering contributing the changes we have made to LLVM and CLang in order to support our proprietary processor, and I would like to seek advice on how best to approach doing this? I am pretty sure that there are coding guidelines and conventions that we should be following but have not followed over the course of the last few

Hi, here are the versions: dc01: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Rev 1.2 root at dc01:~# cat /etc/debian_version 11.8 root at dc01:~# samba -V Version 4.17.12-Debian root at dc01:~# uname -a Linux dc01 6.1.21-v8+ #1642 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 3 17:24:16 BST 2023 aarch64 GNU/Linux Dc02: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Rev 1.2 root at dc02:~# cat /etc/debian_version 11.8 root at dc02:~# samba -V Version

Hi all, is there any possibility to tell icecast an Intro and a backup MP3 ? ANd WHY can this ***** Win Media Player/Real Player active X Plugin not Play the Streams (Real Player (Plugin V8+) only plays what it buffers, Media Player (Plugin VErsion 6.X) does en Error!? What would be the best way to integrate an Playplugin into an Webpage? Best regards, Stefan Jacobi www.chat-radio.de

[I tweaked the subject, #262824 did not introduce the problem, it is just the version I am first seeing this problem] A quick update - I have added 'Sched<[]>' as a base class for all instructions, and also: let hasNoSchedulingInfo = 1; to all the Pseudos, but while most of the errors have gone, I still get the diagnostic for 'COPY' thus: error : No schedule

I am migrating the llvm/clang derived compiler for our processor from the v3.1 to v3.2 codebase. This has mostly gone well except that instruction latency scheduling is no longer happening. The people who implemented this previously sub-classed 'ScheduleDAGInstrs' and implemented the virtual methods 'computeLatency' and 'computeOperandLatency'. However, these methods

Sorry for the delay, I had to experiment and build everything to be sure. I am actually getting the same problem with GCC v4.9.3 on CentOS, but for both Cygwin and Linux adding '-D_GLIBCXX_USE_C99' to the '-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS:STRING=' flag during configuration cured the problem. MartinO -----Original Message----- From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] Sent: 06

Hi, i have a working Samba AD with 2 DCs based on Version 4.15.7-Debian and Debian 10. The main Problem was Lack of Win 11 Support (beginning with a certain update) So the goal was to switch to backports and samba Version 4.17.9-Debian. But this does not work on 32bit Pi OS. So i tested this weekend the following combination: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Rev 1.2 Linux sdc01 6.1.21-v8+

I've no idea, but without it, the 'std::to_string' definitions are not enabled! -----Original Message----- From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] Sent: 06 July 2016 19:35 To: Martin.ORiordan at movidius.com Cc: LLVM Developers <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? On 6 July 2016 at 19:02, Martin J.

Thanks again Elior, Yes, I tried using '!if', etc. but I just get type mismatches for the initializer (int) - probably something daft I'm doing :-( MartinO -----Original Message----- From: Malul, Elior [mailto:elior.malul at intel.com] Sent: 29 September 2013 09:19 To: Martin.ORiordan at movidius.com; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Tblgen and computed expressions

Hi Martin, On Oct 2, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Martin O'Riordan <Martin.ORiordan at movidius.com> wrote: > I was investigating an error diagnostic in the following test example: > > typedef signed char char16 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16))); > > void test( char16 srcA, char16 srcB, char16 *dst) { > *dst = ( srcA == srcB ); > } > > which produces the

Thanks again for your help Steve, I’m thinking perhaps my “SelectADDRrr” pattern is inadequate. The sign-extension is at the hardware level, the code generator sees (should see) it as a 16-bit signed register value. My implementation is just: bool SHAVEISelDAGtoDAG::SelectADDRrr(SDValue &Addr, SDValue &Base, SDValue &Offset) { if ((Addr.getOpcode() == ISD::ADD) { Base

"Martin J. O'Riordan" <martin.oriordan at movidius.com> writes: > Thanks Ahmed and also Alex for your replies. > > This is more or less what I was realising, but it is a great > confidence booster to know that it is the correct way also. I can > replace all of my various 'Select*' specialisations with version that > use

Hi Mehdi and my apologies for the delay in responding - the day job got in the way :-) Our target is still out-of-tree so my reasons for extending the IR would be eliminated if we were a proper part of LLVM, which I would like to do when the time is right for us. My extensions are quite simple really, and I expect that they will be wanted in the TRUNK sometime anyway. At the moment I only have

Martin hi. It seems like you have in fact understood the offered solution, and its disadvantages. The thing is, that as far as I understand Tblgen (and I think I do :-) ), The idea behind it is that records only have state (i.e., fields), and not a behavior (i.e., methods) - so dynamic evaluation can only be achieved by built-in functions. (e.g., !if(), !foreach() etc...). Maybe you can try

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:34:19 +0100 Dirk Laurenz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Full output: > > root at iob-master:~# samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc01 > --targetdir=/autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/$(hostname -d) -U > administrator Password for [SAMBA\administrator]: > INFO 2023-11-20 15:30:05,639 pid:73781 >

Thanks Ahmed and also Alex for your replies. This is more or less what I was realising, but it is a great confidence booster to know that it is the correct way also. I can replace all of my various 'Select*' specialisations with version that use 'ReplaceNode/SelectCode' and return 'void', but what about the places where I currently call 'Select(N)' directly?

Hi team. I am trying to allocate some rights to users in Active Directory, by using the "Delegation of Control Wizard" from ADUC. The steps I'm following were executed under the domain administrator user and are the following: 1. open ADUC and right click the top level OU (Ex. domain.org) 2. from the pop-up menu, select ?Delegate Control?? 3. click next in the first page of the

I just checked with '-E' and I am picking up '<string>' from: /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc/cygwin/4.9.3/include/c++/string all other C++ headers are coming from the same place. The 'std::to_string' functions are not present in '<string>', but they are located in '<bits/basic_string.h>' - which is included. Perhaps it is a broken Cygwin

I was investigating an error diagnostic in the following test example: typedef signed char char16 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16))); void test( char16 srcA, char16 srcB, char16 *dst) { *dst = ( srcA == srcB ); } which produces the message: mismatch.c:5:10: error: assigning to 'char16' from incompatible type 'char __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16)))' *dst = (

+cbieneman Mr. CMake might know how to fix it ;) Jon On 11/16/16 1:52 PM, mats petersson wrote: > Thanks, at least I know I'm not imagining or doing something really > daft! ;) > > My cmake skills are near 0%, so not sure I can fix, but perhaps I can > at least raise a bug? ;) > > -- > Mats > > On 16 November 2016 at 20:28, Martin J. O'Riordan >