similar to: Error building llvm

Hello, I am building LLVM with ninja on Linux environment and I continue to have the error below. I am thinking that the cause might be my PC not having sufficient RAM memory. In this sense, I extended my swap memory with a swap file (90GB), but it didn't solved the problem. Should I add more physical RAM memory to my PC, or is there any software based solution I can try first? Thank you and

This is release_50 branch of git, sha1: f1d5723be3f9456a6b16cdf687847ac2918846de Using gcc 7.2.0 from homebrew. $ CC=/usr/local/opt/gcc/bin/x86_64-apple-darwin16.7.0-gcc-7 CXX=/usr/local/opt/gcc/bin/x86_64-apple-darwin16.7.0-g++-7 cmake .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/Users/andy/local/llvm5 -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=/Users/andy/local/llvm5 $ make VERBOSE=1 [ 92%] Linking CXX

2015-11-30 12:58 GMT+08:00 Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com>: > The autotools build system is officially deprecated and will be removed in a > future release. > > CMake is the recommended configuration system, but it is only a > configuration system. It generates build files for multiple different build > systems. One of the most popular build systems is Ninja. You cannot

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I'm pretty sure that the LLVMContext constructor is defined in libLLVMCore.a > What is the output of `llvm-config --libs bitwriter`?  Does it include > -lLLVMCore? Hi Duncan, e0082888 at e0082888-laptop:~$ local/bin/llvm-config --libs bitwriter -lLLVMBitWriter -lLLVMCore -lLLVMSupport

Hi Tom, > I'm trying to start a project based on llvm, but am running into some > difficulties. I started with the 'LLVM Project Guide', but got hung > up in the complexities of configure.ac. I'm now using llvm-config to > provide the linker directives, but this results in undefined > references: > > $ llvm-g++ `$HOME/local/bin/llvm-config --cppflags

I'm trying to start a project based on llvm, but am running into some difficulties. I started with the 'LLVM Project Guide', but got hung up in the complexities of configure.ac. I'm now using llvm-config to provide the linker directives, but this results in undefined references: $ llvm-g++ `$HOME/local/bin/llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs bitwriter` ModuleMaker.cpp

2015-12-01 1:20 GMT+08:00 Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com>: > > On Nov 29, 2015, at 9:09 PM, 慕冬亮 <mudongliangabcd at gmail.com> wrote: > > 2015-11-30 12:58 GMT+08:00 Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com>: > > The autotools build system is officially deprecated and will be removed in a > future release. > > CMake is the recommended configuration system,

Samuel Williams <space.ship.traveller at gmail.com> writes: > I might just be doing something stupid, but when I do > > $ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/llvm-2.8 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release .. > $ sudo make install > > I don't get the expected headers in > /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm > > It is simply an empty directory. It works fine for me on

Hi Oscar, I tried that but it didn't work. However, it did work fine on Linux for me so I am now a bit confused. Here is the output from $ sudo make install Install the project... -- Install configuration: "Release" -- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/lib/libLLVMSupport.a -- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/lib/libLLVMSystem.a -- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/lib/libLLVMCore.a --

Hey, So in Fedora rawhide we are now building llvm 3.7.1 into the lots of little shared libraries format. However I'm running into a major problem with the fact that sometimes dlclose isn't dropping all the LLVM libraries from the address space of the process. We have a sequence like this: a) X server asks mesa gbm library to init, it loads the kms_swrast_dri.so with

Dear All I need to create a pass that is triggered to run at a specific point during runtime. Also, this pass needs to have access to object file and to be able to modify the original IR. Any idea how to make such pass? Regards, Marwa Yusuf Teaching Assistant - Computer Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering - Benha University E-JUST PhD Student Computer Science & Engineering Dept.

Dear All I've made un update to the llvm to the latest. At configuration, I've met some new errors to me, like it needs lldb, lld, dragonegg, llgo and so. However, I've checked them and configuration went on. Now I'm stuck at build stage, specifically at dragonegg. First it could not find gmp.h, I've solved this by installing libgmp-dev. Now, it can't find auto-host.h.

Thanks a million for replying. Your answer helped me. I inspected the errors more closely - with the help of my supervisor - and managed to solve some problems. Finally the making was successful, by just following steps 1,2 and 3. I found that one of the problems was that I modify in a wrong Passes.h, as there are 2. My question now is: How I can apply this pass? (call, use ... etc) >From what

Dear All I'm making an instrumentation pass. The pass is supposed to modify the given IR in a specefic way. One of the required modifications is to insert a call to a function at a specific location. This is the signature of the called function: void myclass::foo(Function *f, BasicBlock* b) This function's prototype is in an foofile.h file in include/llvm And the function

Dear All Is there is a way I can get the original hogh level code (e.g c++ code) of an IR function within MCJIT? Regards, Marwa Yusuf Teaching Assistant - Computer Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering - Benha University E-JUST PhD Student Computer Science & Engineering Dept. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear All Is there is a way to recompile a function at runtime? It seems that I need to -like - invalidate the recompiled function to force the MCJIT to recompile it, cause when I just call runFunction, it neglects any modifications in the function code. Thanks in advance. Regards, Marwa Yusuf Teaching Assistant - Computer Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering - Benha University E-JUST

Hi Marwa, MCJIT doesn't provide any support for recompilation. The best you can do is use multiple MCJIT instances and destroy whichever one contains the function "foo" that you want to recompile. MCJIT does not do any dependence tracking either, so you'll also need to destroy and recompile any direct callers of "foo" (and their direct callers, and so on). If you know

Dear all I have a question and I really appreciate any help. I'm trying to extract variable values at interrupt of some program. And I want to do that from JIT. The situation is that the JIT will interrupt at certain point of executing some code and tries to get the variables' values. Any help about that? Regards, Marwa Yusuf Teaching Assistant - Computer Engineering Department Faculty

Dear All I'm making a transformation pass that inserts a new basic block at the start of a loop. However when I try to change predecessor/successor relations, it does not consider the new block in the loop at all. So I got that just inserting a loop in a function before another loop is not enough. So how exactly to do this job? Regards, Marwa Yusuf Teaching Assistant - Computer Engineering

This is effectively exactly what a debugger does when introspecting the state of a running program. Your JIT'ed code will need to use the program's debug information to get what it wants. -Jim On Apr 3, 2013, at 5:24 AM, marwayusuf at feng.bu.edu.eg wrote: > Dear all > I have a question and I really appreciate any help. > I'm trying to extract variable values at interrupt